Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/103,391

ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 12, 2025
Priority
Aug 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022032830
Examiner
BUI, HUNG S
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1457 granted / 1667 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1667 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed on 02/12/2025 has been considered and made of record. Oath/Declaration The oath/declaration filed on 02/12/2025 is acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamaguchi et al. [US 2010/0033940], in view of Harrigan [US 2020/0344924]. Regarding claim 1, Yamaguchi et al. disclose an electronic control device (figures 1-9), comprising: a first circuit board (7, figures 3a-3b and 5a-5b) and a second circuit board (7, figures 3a-3b and 5a-5b) disposed to face each other, where a gap (a space is between the first and second circuit boards 7 & 8, figures 3a-3b and 5a-5b) is provided between mounting surfaces, of respective ones of the first circuit board and the second circuit board, each mounted with an electronic component (electronic component(s) 15 and/or 16 mounted on the second circuit board 8, figures 5a-5b) and a shield member (4a & 4b, figures 1 and 2a-2b) that is disposed in the gap between the first circuit board and the second circuit board and blocks a noise; and a conductive member (3a-3h, figure 1-5a-5b) that connects the first circuit board and the second circuit board to the shield member, wherein the shield member is a frame body (4a & 4b, figure 1) forming a closed path that surrounds an entire circumference of a periphery of the electronic components each mounted on one of the first circuit board and the second circuit board and that has a width corresponding to the gap (figures 1 and 5a-5b). Yamaguchi et al., disclose the claimed invention except for an electronic component mounted on the first printed circuit board. Harrigan discloses a shielded printed circuit board assembly (100, figures 1A-1B) comprising a first printed circuit board (104, figures 1A-1B) coupled to a second printed circuit board (102, figures 1A-1B) through a shielded member (106, figures 1A-1B), a plurality of electric components (108 & 118, figure 1A) are mounted on the second printed circuit board and a plurality of electric components ( 112, figure 1A) are mounted on the first printed circuit board (figure 1A). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to mount at least one electric component(s) on a first printed circuit board of Yamaguchi et al., as suggested by Harrigan, in order to improve fitting more parts into a tighter space of a compact electronic device. Regarding claim 2, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, further disclose wherein the conductive member includes: a first conductive member (5a, figures 2a, 3a and 5a) that connects a first end surface, on a side of the first circuit board of the shield member to the mounting surface of the first circuit board; and a second conductive member (5b, figures 2a, 3a and 5a) that connects a second end surface, on a side of the second circuit board, of the shield member to the mounting surface of the second circuit board, a plurality of the first conductive members (3a-3h, figure 1-5a-5b) are arranged along the first end surface at distances less than or equal to a half of a wavelength of an electromagnetic wave constituting the noise or at distances less than or equal to a quarter of the wavelength, and a plurality of the second conductive members are arranged along the second end surface at distances less than or equal to a half of the wavelength or at distances less than or equal to a quarter of the wavelength. Regarding claim 3, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, further disclose wherein the first conductive members are connected to a ground (9 and/or 11, figure 3a-3b and 5a-5b, paragraph 0036) provided on the first circuit board, and the second conductive members are connected to a ground (10 and/or 12, figures 3a-3b and 5a-5b; paragraph 0036) provided on the second circuit board. Regarding claim 4, Yamaguchi et al., disclosed claimed invention except for wherein the shield member is formed of aluminum, copper, carbon fiber, a conductive resin, or a material in which a surface of a non-conductive material is coated with a conductive resin. Harrigan further discloses wherein the shield member is formed of aluminum (paragraph 0028). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use aluminum material to make a shield member in an electronic control device of Yamaguchi et al., as suggested by Harrigan, in order to provide a high strength-to-weight ratio for a shield member in a control device. Regarding claim 12, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, further disclose a spacer (1, figures 2b, 3b and 5b) that maintains the gap between the first circuit board and the second circuit board, wherein the spacer is fixed to the shield member. Claims 5-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Fujiwara et al. [US 20210014994], and Lindstedt et al. [US 2022/0046809]. Regarding claim 5, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, disclose the claimed invention except for a heat dissipation plate disposed, inside the shield member, between the electronic component mounted on the first circuit board and the electronic component mounted on the second circuit board; and heat dissipation materials in contact with the electronic components and the heat dissipation plate; and a housing that accommodates the first circuit board, the second circuit board, the shield member, the conductive members, the heat dissipation plate, and the heat dissipation materials; and a heat sink provided outside the housing, wherein the heat dissipation plate is connected to the heat sink through or via the shield member and the housing. Fujiwara et al., disclose an electronic control device (100, figures 6 and 14) comprising a heat dissipation plate (31, figure 6) disposed, inside a shield member (20, figure 6), between an electronic component (22, figure 6) mounted on a first circuit board (17, figure 6) and an electronic component (23, figure 6) mounted on a second circuit board (18, figure 14); and heat dissipation materials (34, figure 6) in contact with the electronic components and the heat dissipation plate; and a housing (16 & 21, figure 6) that accommodates the first circuit board, the second circuit board, the shield member, the conductive members, the heat dissipation plate, and the heat dissipation materials (figures 6 and 14). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to add a heat dissipation plate disposed inside a shield member of a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as suggested by Fujiwara et al., in order to conduct thermal energy away from components on multiple circuit boards of a control device. Lindstedt et al., disclose an electronic device (figures 1-7A-7B) comprising at least one heat sink (174, figure 7A, paragraph 0050) mounted outside a housing and a heat dissipation plate (a carrier 133, figure 7A) is connected to the heat sink through a housing (135, figure 7A). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to add an external heat sink connected a heat dissipation plate of a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Fujiwara et al., as suggested by Lindstedt et al., in order to conduct heat away from a control device. Regarding claim 6, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Lindstedt et al., disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the heat dissipation plate includes: a first base projecting toward the electronic component mounted on the first circuit board; and a second base projecting toward the electronic component mounted on the second circuit board, and the heat dissipation materials fill a space between the electronic component mounted on the first circuit board and the first base and a space between the electronic component mounted on the second circuit board and the second base. Fujiwara et al., further disclose wherein the heat dissipation plate includes a first base (a top member 34, figure 6) projecting toward the electronic component mounted on the first circuit board; and a second base (a bottom member 34, figure 6) projecting toward the electronic component mounted on the second circuit board, and the heat dissipation materials fill a space between the electronic component mounted on the first circuit board and the first base and a space between the electronic component mounted on the second circuit board and the second base (figure 6). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to add a first base and a second base between a heat dissipation plate and a plurality of components of the first and second circuit boards in a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Lindstedt et al., as suggested by Fujiwara et al., in order to absorb heat from components cross multiple circuit boards and transfer it to a heat dissipation plate of a control device. Regarding claim 7, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Fujiwara et al., disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the heat sink includes a plurality of fins that extend, regardless of an installation posture of the housing, along a gravity direction and are arranged to be spaced from each other in a horizontal direction. Lindstedt et al., further disclose wherein the heat sink includes a plurality of fins (174, figure 7A) that extend, regardless of an installation posture of the housing, along a gravity direction and are arranged to be spaced from each other in a horizontal direction (figures 2A-2B, 3A-3B and 4A). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a heat sink including a plurality of fins thereon on a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Fujiwara et al., as suggested by Lindstedt et al., in order to rapidly transfer and dissipate heat away from a control device. Regarding claim 8, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Fujiwara et al., disclosed the claimed invention except for wherein each of the shield members, the heat dissipation plate, and the heat sink is formed of aluminum, copper, or carbon fiber. Harrigan further discloses wherein the shield member is formed of aluminum (paragraph 0028). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use aluminum material to make a shield member in an electronic control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Fujiwara et al., as suggested by Harrigan, in order to provide a high strength-to-weight ratio for a shield member in a control device. Lindstedt et al., further disclose the heat dissipation plate (a carrier 33 and/or 133 is/are formed of aluminum, paragraph 0045-0046), and the heat sink is formed of aluminum (paragraphs 0045-0046), copper, or carbon fiber. It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use aluminum material to make a heat dissipated plate and a heat sink in an electronic control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Fujiwara et al., and Harrigan, as suggested by Lindstedt et al., in order to conduct thermal energy away from components on multiple circuit boards of a control device. Regarding claim 9, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Fujiwara et al., and Lindstedt et al., disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the shield member, the heat dissipation plate, and the heat sink are integrally formed. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to integrally form a shield member, a heat dissipation plate, and a heat sink in a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, and Fujiwara et al., and Lindstedt et al., in order to continuously conduct heat away from components on multiple circuit boards to a heatsink of a control device, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150U.S. 164 (1893). Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Zielinski et al. [US 2011/0274287]. Regarding claim 10, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the electronic control device is mounted on a vehicle, the electronic control device further comprising a housing that accommodates the first circuit board, the second circuit board, the shield member, and the conductive member; and a bracket that connects the housing to a frame ground of a vehicle body, wherein the shield member is connected to the bracket. Zielinski et al., disclose a control device (10, figures 1-5) being mounted on a vehicle (see abstract or paragraph 0018), wherein the electronic control device further comprising a housing (14 & 16, figures 1-5) that accommodates a plurality of components within (figures 1-5); and a bracket (20, figures 1-5) that connects the housing to a frame ground of a vehicle body (15, figures 1-5), wherein a shield member (48, figures 1-5) is connected to the bracket. It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a metallic bracket that connected to a shield member in a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as suggested by Zielinski et al., in order to ground a control device to a ground vehicle’s chassis. Regarding claim 11, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, disclose the claimed invention except for wherein the bracket is formed of aluminum, copper, carbon fiber, a conductive resin, or a material in which a surface of a non-conductive material is coated with a conductive resin. Zielinski et al., further disclose a control device’s bracket is formed of a material in which a surface of a non-conductive material is coated with a conductive resin (paragraphs 0001-0008). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a bracket design of Zielinski et al., with a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, in order to provide an electrically conductive grounding path between a control device and an automotive vehicle. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kagawa et al. [US 2011/0199748]. Regarding claim 13, Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, disclose the claimed invention except for a housing that accommodates the first circuit board, the second circuit board, the shield member, and the conductive member, wherein the housing is made of metal or resin. Kagawa et al., disclose an electronic control device (1, figure 3) comprising a housing (8 & 6, figure 3) that accommodates a first circuit board (4A, figure 3), a second circuit board (4B, figure 3), and wherein the housing is made of metal or resin (paragraph 0030). It would have been to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use a metal housing to enclose a first circuit board, a second circuit board, a shield member, and a conductive member in a control device of Yamaguchi et al., in view of Harrigan, as suggested by Kagawa et al., in order to protect a control device’s components. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Ono et al. [US 2005/0260867] disclose board connecting component and three-dimensional connecting structure; and HA et al. [US 2021/0014970] disclose electronic device including interposer; Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Hung S. Bui whose telephone number is (571)272-2102. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L. Parker can be reached on (303) 297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center. for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG S. BUI/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2841 /HUNG S. BUI/Primary Patent Examiner, 2841/2800
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 12, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772405
REPEATEDLY, QUICKLY AND REMOVABLY CONNECTABLE RETAINING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772396
SUPPORTS FOR BENDABLE AUTO INTERIOR COVER MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764877
FRAME SYSTEM AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757342
DISPLAY DEVICE AND VEHICLE HAVING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757341
SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1667 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month