Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/103,756

DEVICE FOR COOLING A DATA CENTER COMPUTER SERVER BY USING A PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Priority
Sep 02, 2022 — FR FR2208844 +1 more
Examiner
ARANT, HARRY E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sun-Ice Energy Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
294 granted / 593 resolved
-10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
640
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 593 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites “the items” in line 3, which lacks proper antecedent basis. For examining purposes the limitation will be interpreted as referring to the “ventilation unit” of claim 5. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-7, 10, 11, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kaplan et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0338230, “Kaplan”). Regarding claim 1, Kaplan discloses a cooling device for at least a datacenter computer server (figs 1-6), wherein said device comprises: a phase-change material (within 114) configured to exchange heat with at least one of the components of said server (of 104); at least one heat exchanger (127, 128) connected to a heat transfer fluid circuit (110); said device being configured, on one hand, to cool at least one component of said server by storing heat generated by said component in the phase-change material and, on the other hand, to release the heat stored in the phase-change material via said heat exchanger (¶0016-0018). Regarding claim 3, Kaplan further discloses an electronic monitoring unit (138) configured to monitor the release of the heat stored in the phase-change material (¶0022). Regarding claim 4, Kaplan further discloses that the heat transfer fluid circuit is thermally coupled to heat pump type circuit (108, ¶0016). Regarding claim 5, Kaplan further discloses wherein the device comprises a ventilation unit (106) configured to circulate an air flow through said server (of 104) to the phase-change material (of 114, as the air is circulated, see ¶0026). Regarding claim 6, Kaplan further discloses that the ventilation unit (106) is located in order to suck air out of the server (if 104, as air circulated and thus is sucked out of the server, see ¶0026). Regarding claim 7, Kaplan further discloses that the air flow from the ventilation unit (106) is directed to at least a cooling unit1 comprising said heat exchanger (127, 128) and said phase-change material (of 114, see fig 1). Regarding claim 10, Kaplan further discloses that the heat transfer fluid circuit is configured so that the heat transfer fluid flows through the heat exchanger upward (as some fluid must flow upward in order to allow for heat exchange with the PCM, as shown below in annotated 2 below). PNG media_image1.png 524 772 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, Kaplan further discloses that the device comprises a heat conduction item (128) that links at least one of the components of said server (of 104) to the phase-change material (of 114). Regarding claim 13, Kaplan further discloses a Datacenter comprising at least one server with a cooling device according to claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kwon (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2017/0188484). Regarding claim 2, Kaplan discloses all previous claim limitations. However, Kaplan does not explicitly disclose that the device comprises at least one renewable electrical energy source configured to power the items of said device. Kwon, however, discloses a cooling device wherein the device comprises at least one renewable electrical energy source (1, “solar”, ¶0052-0053) configured to power the items of said device (5, ¶0052-0053). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Kaplan to provide the renewable electrical energy source of Kwon in order to power the items while not impacting the grid. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan as applied to claim 7 above, and further in view of Goenka (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0087316). Regarding claim 8, Kaplan discloses all previous claim limitations. Kaplan further discloses that the heat exchanger of the cooling unit (127, 128, phase-change material of 114, see fig 1), comprises: a first structure (127) where a conduit is designed for the heat transfer fluid of the heat transfer fluid circuit; second structure around the first structure and being configured to cool (by heat transfer to the phase-change material) the air flow from the ventilation unit (as there must be a second structure to allow for heat exchange between the air and phase change material and fluid). However, Kaplan does not explicitly disclose a said first and second structures being configured so that there is a gap between said structures that define a housing where said phase-change material is positioned. Goenka, however, discloses a cooling device (figs 2 and 3) wherein a first (92, ¶0037) and second structure (84, ¶0036) are configured so that there is a gap between said structures that define a housing (94, ¶0037) where said phase-change material is positioned. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Kaplan to provide the structures of Goenka in order to provide efficient heat exchange between the air, phase change material, and fluid. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan as applied to claim 7 above, and further in view of Ross et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2017/0347499, “Ross”). Regarding claim 9, Kaplan discloses all previous claim limitations. However, Kaplan dose not explicitly disclose wherein the air flow from the ventilation unit is directed through the cooling unit downward. Ross, however, discloses a cooling device (fig 5) wherein air flow from a ventilation unit (see annotated fig 5 below) is directed through a cooling unit (524) downward. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Kaplan to have the air flow be directed downward through the cooling unit such as taught by Ross in order to allow for the optimal positioning of the elements. PNG media_image2.png 552 464 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of Heiland et al. (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0205822, “Heiland”). Regarding claim 12, Kaplan discloses all previous claim limitations. However, Kaplan dose not explicitly disclose that the heat conduction item further comprises a Peltier thermoelectric module. Heiland, however, disclose a cooling device (fig 50) wherein a heat conduction item comprises a Peltier thermoelectric module (66). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Kaplan to provide the Peltier thermoelectric module of Heiland in order to provide additional cooling for the data center. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY E ARANT whose telephone number is (571)272-1105. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at (571)270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY E ARANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742599
LATENT HEAT STORAGE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12723824
HEAT EXCHANGER AND HEAT EXCHANGER MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716659
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD BASED ON CARBON DIOXIDE GAS-LIQUID PHASE CHANGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710234
MODULAR DOUBLE BRAZED PHASE-CHANGE MATERIAL HEAT EXCHANGER
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12697852
MITIGATING AIRLOCK IN COOLING CHANNELS FOR LARGE AREA COOLING SYSTEMS FOR BATTERIES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+21.4%)
3y 6m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 593 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month