Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/103,831

ROTATING TOOL AND SENSOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Aug 29, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022032427
Examiner
FORD, DARRELL CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
451 granted / 592 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
631
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-16 are currently presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper content of an abstract of the disclosure. A patent abstract is a concise statement of the technical disclosure of the patent and should include that which is new in the art to which the invention pertains. The abstract should not refer to purported merits or speculative applications of the invention and should not compare the invention with the prior art. If the patent is of a basic nature, the entire technical disclosure may be new in the art, and the abstract should be directed to the entire disclosure. If the patent is in the nature of an improvement in an old apparatus, process, product, or composition, the abstract should include the technical disclosure of the improvement. The abstract should also mention by way of example any preferred modifications or alternatives. Where applicable, the abstract should include the following: (1) if a machine or apparatus, its organization and operation; (2) if an article, its method of making; (3) if a chemical compound, its identity and use; (4) if a mixture, its ingredients; (5) if a process, the steps. Extensive mechanical and design details of an apparatus should not be included in the abstract. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. See MPEP § 608.01(b) for guidelines for the preparation of patent abstracts. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the Abstract of 14 February 2025 with more than 150 words in length. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the shaft portion side" in line 14. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The examiner notes that line 2 recites “a shaft portion,” however the shaft portion is defined by a rotation axis such that it is unclear how one having ordinary skill in the art would determine a direction which faces the shaft portion side. Claims 2-14 each depend from claim 1, and therefore are rejected for at least the reasons presented above with respect to claim 1. Claim 15 recites “a first portion having a first main surface and a second main surface and arranged such that the first main surfaced faces an outer peripheral surface of the shaft portion” at lines 10-11. Claim 15 is understood to be directed to a sensor device “capable of” configuring a sensor unit of a rotating tool including a shaft portion. To the best of the examiner’s understanding, the sensor device of claim 15 does not positively require or include the rotating tool, such that it is unclear how one having ordinary skill in the art could determine that a portion of the sensor device is defined by its orientation relative to geometry of the rotating tool. Phrased differently: If the sensor device is located on a storage shelf or in transit to an assembly location to be assembled to the rotating tool, how would one having ordinary skill in the art determine that the claimed first portion is positioned relative to the outer peripheral surface of the shaft portion of the rotating tool? It is unclear how the geometry or configuration of the components of the sensor device can be understood relative to a structure or device which is not positively required. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the shaft portion side" in line 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The examiner notes that line 2 recites “a shaft portion,” however the shaft portion is defined by a rotation axis such that it is unclear how one having ordinary skill in the art would determine a direction which faces the shaft portion side. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the shaft region side" in line 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The examiner notes that line 1 recites “a shaft region.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record does not explicitly disclose or fairly teach “the sensor unit including a sensor module, the sensor module including a battery, a first sensor that detects a first physical quantity of the shaft region, and a board electrically connected to the first sensor, the board including a first portion having a first main surface and a second main surface and arranged such that the first main surface faces an outer peripheral surface of the shaft region, and a second portion having a third main surface and a fourth main surface and arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft portion side, the second portion being electrically connector to the first portion” in combination with the remaining limitations of the claim. Understood to be the closest prior art of record, United States Patent 10,828,739 to Ziegltrum et al. teaches a tool (10) having a sensor (230) connected to an electrical circuit (40). Ziegltrum teaches multiple circuits (40a, 40b, 40c) connected to the tool (10; see Fig. 7), each circuit connected in signal transferring fashion and connected electrically to a sensor (sensors 30 to 36), but does not fairly teach that the respective circuit boards are positions such that a second portion of one of the boards is arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft region side. Regarding claim 15, the prior art of record does not explicitly disclose or fairly teach “the sensor unit including a sensor module, the sensor module including a battery, a first sensor that detects a first physical quantity of the shaft region, and a board electrically connected to the first sensor, the board including a first portion having a first main surface and a second main surface and arranged such that the first main surface faces an outer peripheral surface of the shaft region, and a second portion having a third main surface and a fourth main surface and arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft portion side, the second portion being electrically connector to the first portion” in combination with the remaining limitations of the claim. United States Patent 10,828,739 to Ziegltrum et al. teaches a tool (10) having a sensor (230) connected to an electrical circuit (40). Ziegltrum teaches multiple circuits (40a, 40b, 40c) connected to the tool (10; see Fig. 7), each circuit connected in signal transferring fashion and connected electrically to a sensor (sensors 30 to 36), but does not fairly teach that the respective circuit boards are positions such that a second portion of one of the boards is arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft region side. Regarding claim 16, the prior art of record does not explicitly disclose or fairly teach “the sensor unit including a sensor module, the sensor module including a battery, a first sensor that detects a first physical quantity of the shaft region, and a board electrically connected to the first sensor, the board including a first portion having a first main surface and a second main surface and arranged such that the first main surface faces an outer peripheral surface of the shaft region, and a second portion having a third main surface and a fourth main surface and arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft region side, the second portion being electrically connector to the first portion” in combination with the remaining limitations of the claim. United States Patent 10,828,739 to Ziegltrum et al. teaches a tool (10) having a sensor (230) connected to an electrical circuit (40). Ziegltrum teaches multiple circuits (40a, 40b, 40c) connected to the tool (10; see Fig. 7), each circuit connected in signal transferring fashion and connected electrically to a sensor (sensors 30 to 36), but does not fairly teach that the respective circuit boards are positions such that a second portion of one of the boards is arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction of the shaft region such that the third main surface faces the shaft region side. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: United States Patent 10,828,739 to Ziegltrum et al. teaches a tool (10) having a sensor (230) connected to an electrical circuit (40). Ziegltrum teaches multiple circuits (40a, 40b, 40c) connected to the tool (10; see Fig. 7), each circuit connected in signal transferring fashion and connected electrically to a sensor (sensors 30 to 36). United States Patent Application Publication 2018/0178293 to Yamamoto et al. teaches a rotating tool (1) having a sensor assembly (37) connected to a battery (35). United States Patent Application Publication 2022/0118529 to Grosch teaches a rotating tool having a sensor (9) electrically connected to a board assembly (see Fig. 8) which may be flexible. Grosch teaches its board (13) is electrically connected to a second board (14; see Fig. 8), but does not explicitly disclose a first portion of the board being arranged on an outer periphery side of the first portion in a radial direction. It does not appear that the relative positions of the board portions can be determined from the figures of Grosch. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DARRELL C. FORD whose telephone number is (313)446-6515. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM to 5:15 PM, Monday to Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at (571) 272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DARRELL C FORD/Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759787
QUASI-CYLINDRICAL CARGO CONTAINER AND CONSTRUCTION
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752348
TOOL DRIVING DEVICE AND METHOD OF PRODUCING MACHINED PRODUCT
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751841
LANYARD SYSTEMS FOR PROSTHETIC DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752207
Method for Connecting/Disconnecting Hinged Ball and Socket Blocks
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752871
MANIPULATION UNIT, INSTALLATION HAVING MANIPULATION UNITS, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN INSTALLATION HAVING MANIPULATION UNITS
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.4%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month