Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/104,103

ROLL-UP MODULAR DOORMAT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Aug 18, 2022 — ES P202230757 +1 more
Examiner
RAMSEY, JEREMY C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Basmat Matting Systems S L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
515 granted / 981 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1020
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The following Non-Final Office Action is in response to the application filed 2/14/2025. Status of the claims: Claims 1-5 are hereby examined below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, lines 5-6 recites “the each slat”. Examiner presumes this should read – each slat --. Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 4, lines 4-5 recites “a slat” and “the side”. Examiner presumes this should read – each slat – and – a side -- . Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5, line 2 recites “at the ends” and “the usage position”. Examiner presumes this should read – at ends – and – a usage position -- . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shreiner US 4,877,672 in view of DE 20214105735. In regard to claim 1, Shreiner ‘672 disclose a roll-up modular doormat comprising a plurality of slats (10, Fig. 2) that can be coupled to one another by coupling means (14,20 Fig. 2) located on sides of the plurality of slats (10), wherein each slat (10) of the plurality of slats is formed by a body (12, Fig. 2) comprising an upper covering surface that has a cleaning surface (13, Fig. 3), Shreiner ‘672 fails to disclose wherein the coupling means allow the plurality of slats (1) to be detached from one another by rotating each slat of the plurality of slats relative to an adjoining slat according to a predetermined minimum detachment angle. DE ‘735 discloses wherein the coupling means (8,9 Fig. 1) allow the plurality of slats (2) to be detached from one another by rotating each slat (2) of the plurality of slats relative to an adjoining slat according to a predetermined minimum detachment angle. (specification states “The members can be detached from each other by means of a pivoting movement and be connected to each other again, wherein the circular spring is guided through the opening into or out of the round-shaped groove receiving, without the members against each other, must be moved along the link length. For this purpose, in particular a relative pivoting movement of at least 90 ° is necessary. The axis about which the links can pivot relative to each other is referred to herein as the hinge axis. It is defined by the geometry of the articulated joint comprising the first and second hinge parts.”) It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the device of Shreiner ‘672 to use the coupling means of DE ‘735 for the purpose of providing a connection that will allow the release of two sections in a simple manner for the purpose of repair or maintenance as is stated by DE ‘735. In regard to claim 2, Shreiner ‘672 as modified by DE ‘735 discloses the predetermined minimum detachment angle (8) between the slats (1) is greater than or equal to 90°. (specification states that “Preferred is a predetermined maximum pivot angle of 90 ° to 120 ° “) In regard to claim 3, Shreiner ‘672 as modified by DE ‘735 disclose wherein the coupling means (8,9 as taught by DE ‘735) are configured to allow an inward roll-up of the doormat with the cleaning surface (13, Shreiner ‘6725) facing the outside. (as shown in Fig. 3, the slats have an inward roll) In regard to claim 4, Shreiner ‘672 as modified by DE ‘735 disclose wherein that the coupling means (8,9 as taught by DE ‘735) are in the form of two hooks (8,9) complementary to one another between one side of a slat (1) and the side of the adjoining slat (1). In regard to claim 5, Shreiner ‘672 discloses wherein the plurality of slats (12) located at the ends of the doormat in the usage position have terminations (36, Fig. 2) configured to be adapted to the surface on which they are placed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMY C RAMSEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3133. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Wed 7:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Cahn can be reached at 571-270-5616. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEREMY C RAMSEY/Examiner, Art Unit 3634 /DANIEL P CAHN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669012
WINDOW BLIND
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669011
ROLLING SHUTTER DOOR FENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12617267
Device for Regulating an Air Flow
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12577831
Elongate Mounting Structure and Mounting Unit Comprising the Same for Mounting an Architectural Covering Between Opposing Mounting Surfaces
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577784
AWNING APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.8%)
3y 0m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month