Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/104,127

Forming Machine Having a Cutting Device

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Examiner
ALAWADI, MOHAMMED S
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hatebur Umformmaschinen AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
510 granted / 692 resolved
+3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
753
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Rejections based on Claim Rejections -35 U.S.C. 112(b) still standing because the Applicant did not correct issues in claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the stroke" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the direction" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the closet prior art is Sakai (US3831411A), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitation of “the cutting device further comprises means for adjusting a stroke and a direction of the forward movement of the cutting carriage” in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claims 2-9 and 11-12 are allowed because they depend from claim 1. Regarding claim 10, the closet prior art is Sakai (US3831411A), however in the opinion of the Examiner that the arts of record neither anticipates nor render obvious the limitation of “for positioning the cut-off bar section in the forming station, the stroke and the direction of the forward movement of the cutting carriage are adjusted” in combination with the other limitations of the claim. Claim 10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED S ALAWADI whose telephone number is (571)272-2224. The examiner can normally be reached 08:00 am- 05:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTOPHER TEMPLETON can be reached at (571)270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED S. ALAWADI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
May 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 15, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599911
CRUSHING AND CLASSIFYING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CRUSHING AND CLASSIFYING ELECTRODE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589421
HAIRPIN COIL FLATTENING CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588782
COFFEE GRINDER WITH AUTOMATIC DOSE CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582993
ELECTRICALLY-DRIVEN STONE MATERIAL CRUSHING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576407
PORTABLE PAPER SHREDDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month