Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/104,912

ROTARY VALVE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Priority
Aug 19, 2022 — EU 22191246.2 +1 more
Examiner
GRAY, PAUL J
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ti Automotive Technology Center GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
427 granted / 544 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
584
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 544 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 6 of claim 1, amend the word “rotatorily” to instead recite --rotatably--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1- is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Menken et al. (DE 102015000424 B3, hereafter “Menken”). Regarding claim 1, Menken discloses a rotary valve (1), comprising a valve housing (3) with a valve chamber (the chamber within 3), wherein the valve chamber has at least one chamber wall (the walls where the openings 3.1-3.8 are formed) in which at least two fluid openings (3.1-3.8) are introduced, wherein the valve chamber accommodates a valve core (2, 2.2), wherein the valve core is provided with a channel structure (N1-N4, K1-K4) which interacts with the fluid openings, wherein the valve core is rotatorily accommodated in the valve chamber, and wherein the valve core is formed in at least two parts (2 and 2.2 are two different parts). Regarding claim 2, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 1, wherein the valve core has at least one inner part (2) and one outer part (2.2), wherein the outer part surrounds the at least one inner part at least partially on the circumference side. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 3, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 1, wherein the outer part is formed as a sleeve and accommodates the at least one inner part. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 4, Menken further discloses he rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein openings are introduced in the outer part. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 5, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to according to claim 2, wherein the channel structure is formed in the at least one inner part. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 6, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein the at least one inner part is formed in a rib-like manner. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 7, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein the at least one inner part and the outer part are connected to one another in a materially bonded manner. (note that this is a product by process limitation; para. [0050]-[0054]) Regarding claim 8, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein the at least one inner part and the outer part are connected to one another in a form-fitting manner. (note that this is a product by process limitation; para. [0050]-[0054]) Regarding claim 9, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein the outer part of the valve core rests against the chamber wall of the valve chamber in a sealing manner at least in sections. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 10, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein a sealing contour is allocated to the outer part and/or the at least one inner part. (Fig. 7) Regarding claim 12, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, wherein at a channel structure is formed in the outer part. (see the channels formed through 3.1-3.8) Regarding claim 15, Menken further discloses a temperature control circuit of an electric vehicle, comprising at least one rotary valve configured according to claim 1. (para. [0002] – [0003]) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11, 13, and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Menken. Regarding claim 11, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the valve core is formed of plastic. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to modify the valve core of Menken to be formed of plastic since selection of a known material on the basis of its suitability for an intended use involves only routine skill in the art. The motivation for doing so would be to provide a cost effective and durable material. Regarding claim 13, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 2, but fails to disclose wherein the valve core has multiple outer parts. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to modify the valve core of Menken to have multiple outer parts since separating parts that were once integral involves only routine skill in the art. The motivation for doing so would be to provide a valve core which allows for the user to replace a respective part of the apparatus that may become damaged without having to replace the entire integral part. Regarding claim 14, Menken further discloses the rotary valve according to claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the valve housing and the valve core are formed of plastic. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the application to modify the valve core of Menken to be formed of plastic since selection of a known material on the basis of its suitability for an intended use involves only routine skill in the art. The motivation for doing so would be to provide a cost effective and durable material. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL J GRAY whose telephone number is (571)270-0544. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571 272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL J GRAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768486
WATER LEAK REPAIR FITTING
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768769
FUEL/WATER SEPARATOR PROBE
1y 12m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759724
HYDROGEN FUEL SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760817
Re-Usable Conduit Assembly And Storage Method
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747053
PRESSURIZED GAS SOURCE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 544 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month