Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/105,026

WATERPROOF AND WATER VAPOUR-PERMEABLE FOOTWEAR ARTICLES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Priority
Aug 22, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTIT2022000044
Examiner
KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
W L Gore & Associati S R L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
313 granted / 653 resolved
-22.1% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
714
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 653 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-15 are being treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7, 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Haimerl (US 2010/0064453). Regarding Claim 1, Haimerl discloses a waterproof and water vapor permeable footwear article (Para. 2, Figures 1-3) comprising.an upper (13), an insole (33), a spacer (17), and a sole (41); wherein the upper comprises at least an outer material (12, 19, Figures 14 & 15) and a waterproof and water vapour permeable membrane (16) laminated to the inside facing surface of the outer material, wherein the spacer comprises a channel structure (Para. 93 & Figure 1-5); wherein the spacer is attached to the inside facing surface of the upper (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15); and wherein the sole is an injected sole (Para. 113, 114 & 116). Regarding Claim 2, Haimerl discloses the spacer is selected from a spacer tape, a frame board, or a stuck board (17, Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 3, Haimerl discloses the spacer is selected from a windows board with a spacer material or a window stuck board with a spacer material (17, Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 4, Haimerl discloses the spacer is attached to the bottom end of the waterproof and water vapour permeable membrane of the upper (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 5, Haimerl discloses the spacer is attached to upper with adhesive or with a seam (stitch, Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 6, Haimerl discloses comprising a liner (18). Regarding Claim 7, Haimerl discloses the liner comprises at least a liner textile or at least a liner textile and a waterproof and water vapour permeable membrane (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 9, Haimerl discloses the bottom end of the liner extends beyond the bottom end of the upper (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 10, Haimerl discloses the channels of the channel structure extend horizontally in the waterproof and water vapour permeable footwear article (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 11, Haimerl discloses the channels of the channel structure extend vertically in the waterproof and water vapour permeable footwear article (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15). Regarding Claim 12, Haimerl discloses the channels comprise a wall on at least 60% of their circumference (Figures 1-5, 14 & 15).. Regarding claims 13-15, if a prior art, in its normal and usual operation, would necessarily describe a device capable of performing the steps of the method or process, then the device claimed will be considered to be inherent by the prior art process or method. When the prior art process or method is the same as a process or method described in the specification for describing the claimed device, it can be assumed the process or method will inherently describe the claimed device capable of performing the different steps of the process or method. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haimerl (US 2010/0064453) in view of Wiener (WO 01/12003 A1) Regarding Claim 8, Haimerl does not specifically discloses the liner together with a nonwoven forms a bootie. However, Wiener disclose using a liner which can be formed of a nonwoven to form a bootie inside of a waterproof shoe (Page 1, lines 29-34, Page 9, lines 14-25). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include a bootie, as taught by Wiener, to the footwear of Haimerl, in order to provide further comfort, functionality and optimize a desired fit. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whose telephone number is (571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA HUYNH can be reached at 571-272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHARINE G KANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757974
Article of Footwear Comprising a Sole Member with Aperture Patterns
4y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760451
Fabric and Garments Made of Such Fabric
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12727639
FOOTWEAR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721405
GOLF SHOES WITH LACE TIGHTENING SYSTEM FOR CLOSURE AND COMFORTABLE FIT
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708176
Foot Support Systems Including Fluid Movement Controllers And Adjustable Foot Support Pressure
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+45.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 653 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month