Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/105,588

APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING ORGANIC HYDRIDE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ORGANIC HYDRIDE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Priority
Aug 29, 2022 — JP 2022-136092 +1 more
Examiner
HASKE, WOJCIECH
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Eneos Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
421 granted / 578 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
76.2%
+36.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 578 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2022-136092, filed on 08/29/2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lister et al. (US 20200056292 A1). Considering claims 1 and 3, Lister discloses an apparatus and a method for producing an organic hydride [0021] comprising: a cathode electrode that generates an organic hydride and hydroxide ions from a subject to be hydrogenated and water ([0021] and [0022]); an anode electrode that produces oxygen by oxidizing the hydroxide ions [0022]; and an electrolyte membrane that is composed of an anion exchange membrane and is arranged between the cathode electrode and the anode electrode so as to transfer the hydroxide ions from the cathode electrode side to the anode electrode side [0022]. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yosuke et al. (ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, vol. 10, no. 51, pp. 44396-44402). Considering claims 1 and 3, Lister discloses an apparatus and a method for producing an organic hydride (abstract) comprising: a cathode electrode (RuO2-modified particulate ZnSe:CIGS photocathode) that generates an organic hydride and hydroxide ions from a subject to be hydrogenated and water (page 44397, 1st paragraph and Fig. 1); an anode electrode (Pt coil) that produces oxygen by oxidizing the hydroxide ions (Fig. 1); and an electrolyte membrane that is composed of an anion exchange membrane (anionic ionomer) and is arranged between the cathode electrode and the anode electrode so as to transfer the hydroxide ions from the cathode electrode side to the anode electrode side (page 44397, 1st paragraph and Fig. 1). Considering claim 2, Yosuke discloses the anode electrode (Pt coil) is supplied with an anolyte containing water (Fig. 1), the electrolyte membrane contains water (page 44397, 1st paragraph) and the cathode electrode uses water entering from the electrolyte membrane for a reaction with the substance to be hydrogenated, because hydrogen is generated from alkaline electrolyte at RuO2-modified photocathode, therefore water from the alkaline electrolyte must pass through the anionic ionomer to reach the cathode side. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lister et al. (US 20200056292 A1). Considering claim 2, Yosuke discloses the anode electrode is supplied with an anolyte containing water [0022], and water is not substantially transferred from the anode to the cathode through the anion exchange membrane as may be the case when the membrane comprises a cation exchange membrane or a proton exchange membrane resulting in undesired dilution of the water-soluble organic feed material [0036]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that the anion exchange membrane of Yosuke, will be capable of some water transfer, even though the intent is not to have substantial water transfer compared to cation exchange membrane or a proton exchange membrane, because the Yosuke teaches that such substantial water transfer would result in undesired dilution of the water-soluble organic feed material. Therefor, one would expect that the electrolyte membrane will contain some small (non-zero) amount of water, and the cathode electrode will be able to use that small amount of water entering from the electrolyte membrane for a reaction with the substance to be hydrogenated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Wojciech Haske whose telephone number is (571)272-5666. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at 571-272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WOJCIECH HASKE/Examiner, Art Unit 1794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623931
Pulsed power supply for sustainable redox agent supply for hydrogen abatement during electrochemical hypochlorite generation
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624440
SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612708
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A MULTI-STATE ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12612702
ELECTROCHEMICAL OXIDATION OF CYCLOALKENES TO FORM ALPHA, OMEGA -DICARBOXYLIC ACIDS AND KETOCARBOXYLIC ACIDS
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12601068
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CARBON MONOXIDE OR ORGANIC COMPOUND
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 6m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 578 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month