Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/106,204

METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED USER EQUIPMENT POSITIONING ESTIMATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 24, 2025
Priority
Aug 25, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022114900
Examiner
MURILLO GARCIA, FABRICIO R
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
518 granted / 609 resolved
+23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+57.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
643
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 609 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 7-8, 28 have been amended. Claims 20-27 have been cancelled. Thus, claims 1-19 and 28 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 – Second Paragraph The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. For claim 1: At lines 4-5, it is unclear whether there is a duplication of limitations “a method for direct AI/ML…” with respect to lines 1-2. At lines 8-9, it is unclear whether “UE location estimation” should refer to previous recitation at line 2. At lines 10-11, it is unclear how two other methods are included in the main method. At line 14, “the following” lacks of antecedent basis. At line 16, it is unclear which “entity” it is referring to, as there are other entities previous recited. At line 17, it is unclear whether “UE location estimation” should refer to previous recitation at line 2. At line 18, it is unclear which “entity” it is referring to, as there are other entities previous recited. At line 19, “the AI model” lacks of antecedent basis. For claim 28: This claim is rejected as applied to claim 1. For claims 2-19: These claims are also rejected as they depend upon a rejected claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 1. Zhang et al. US Patent Application Publication No. 2026/0046811 teaches method and apparatus of user equipment (UE) location estimation. 2. Wang et al. US Patent Application Publication No. 2025/0220620 teaches methods, devices, and computer readable medium for communication. 3. Kumar et al. US Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0296718 teaches systems and methods for selection of positioning based on user equipment considerations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FABRICIO R MURILLO GARCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5708. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam K Ahn can be reached at 5712723044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. September 28, 2026 /FABRICIO R MURILLO GARCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 24, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772301
SESSION ESTABLISHMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772146
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR SENDING AND DETERMINING TRACKING AREA CODE, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764652
CELL DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764577
MEASUREMENT BASED ON MEASUREMENT GAP
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764637
NETWORK INFORMATION EXPOSURE METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+57.2%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 609 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month