Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/106,315

SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR NEGATIVE ELECTRODES FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Priority
Oct 31, 2022 — JP 2022-175138 +1 more
Examiner
THOMAS, JAISON P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MITSUBISHI PENCIL Company, Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
561 granted / 679 resolved
+22.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
688
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.8%
+35.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 679 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2022/0255060 (US ‘060). As to Claim 1, US ‘060 discloses a slurry composition (para. 0117) which is comprised of carbon nanotubes, carbon based active material (which the Examiner construes as a type of conductive material), negative active electrode material (e.g. silicon material), binder and dispersants (Abstract) wherein the dispersants are a mixture of carboxymethyl cellulose polymers wherein the first polymer has molecular weight range of 350,000 to 750,000 and the second polymer has a molecular weight range of 800,000 to 1,600,000. However, the reference fails to disclose a composition wherein one of the carboxymethyl cellulose polymers has a molecular weight of 300,000 or less as required by the claim. As to the difference, a prima facie case of obviousness exists where the claimed ranges and prior art ranges do not overlap but are close enough that one skilled in the art would have expected them to have the same properties, see Titanium Metals Corp. of America v. Banner, 778F.2d 775,227 USPQ 773 (Fed. Cir. 1985). See MPEP 2144.051. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Specifically, none of the prior art discloses the slurry composition of Claim 1 with the viscosity measurement at the shear rate required by Claim 2 nor is there any teaching, suggestion or motivation in the prior art to arrive at the claimed limitation. The Examiner notes that comparative data illustrating the criticality of the molecular weight endpoint of 350,000 has been reviewed in the instant Specification but no comparative data has been found. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAISON P THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-8917. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 9:00 am-3:30 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Jones can be reached at (571) 270-7733. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.P.T/Examiner, Art Unit 1762 /jt/ 6/9/2026 /ROBERT S JONES JR/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685015
PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662593
SUPRAMOLECULE-BASED TOPOLOGICAL NETWORK ENABLED HIGHLY STRETCHABLE, CONDUCTING, AND PHOTO-PATTERNABLE PEDOT:PSS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12630691
METHODS FOR FORMING DISPERSED CARBON NANOMATERIALS FOR USE IN POLYMER COMPOSITES AND COATINGS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12603282
Cathode Slurry Composition, Cathode for Secondary Battery and Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600877
HIGH-TEMPERATURE CU INK-BASED CONDUCTOR WITH OXIDATION AND CORROSION RESISTANCE
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 679 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month