Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/106,559

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 25, 2025
Priority
Aug 26, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0107748 +1 more
Examiner
MANDEVILLE, JASON M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 12m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 740 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.2%
+35.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 740 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the side frame" in the second line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. In this regard, a “main frame,” a “side bracket,” and “sides of the inner plate” have all previously been defined in the claim, and it is wholly unclear what “the side frame” is intended to reference. As such, Claims 5-8 are rejected for failing to point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jung et al. (hereinafter “Jung” US 2017 / 0295655). As pertaining to Claim 1, Jung discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 2, and Fig. 3) a display device (1) comprising: a flexible display panel (10); a bottom cover (20, 110) disposed at a rear of the display panel (10) and coupled to the display panel (10; see Page 3, Para. [0077]-[0079] and [0082]); a driving module (120; see Fig. 4) disposed at a rear of the bottom cover (20, 110) and including a moving block (122, 131) that makes a reciprocal movement (i.e., an outer/inner linear movement; see Page 3, through Page 4, Para. [0083]-[0089] and [0091]-[0093]); a wing bracket (141) fixed to the rear of the bottom cover (20, 110) at a position adjacent to the driving module (120); and a wing (140, 133) elongated with a first end (i.e., a right end) fixed (i.e., via (131, 132)) to the moving block (122, 131) and a second end (i.e., a left end) coupled to the bottom cover (20, 110), the wing (140, 133) pivotally connected (i.e., see Fig. 5 and Fig. 6) to the wing bracket (141) between the first end (i.e., the right end) and the second end (i.e., the left end; see Page 4, Para. [0099]-[0101] and [0103]-[0104]), wherein the bottom cover (20, 110) comprises (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18): an inner plate (81) coupled to the display panel (see (11) corresponding to (10)); a flexible main frame (70) coupled to sides of the inner plate (81); an outer plate (80) opposite the display panel (11) with respect to the inner plate (81); and a side bracket (82) disposed between the inner plate (81) and the outer plate (80) and coupled to the main frame (70), wherein the main frame (70) is fixed to the side bracket (82), and the side bracket (82) is coupled to the inner plate (81) in a manner that allows for slip therebetween (see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0149]-[0152], [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 2, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the main frame (70) comprises: a horizontal part (i.e., any arbitrary horizontal part of (70)) disposed between the side bracket (82) and the inner plate (81), the horizontal part (i.e., the arbitrary part of (70)) having a through-hole (see (72), for example); and a vertical part (i.e., any arbitrary vertical part of (70)) covering a side surface of the inner plate (81) and the outer plate (80), the vertical part (i.e., the arbitrary vertical part of (70)) connected to the horizontal part (i.e., the arbitrary horizontal part of (70)), wherein the side bracket (82) comprises a front fastening part (60-1) that extends by protruding toward the display panel (11) and is inserted into the through-hole (see (72)), the side bracket (82) fixed to the main frame (70; again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 3, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the inner plate (81) has a long hole (i.e., see the space to the left of (45b-1) in Fig. 17 and Fig. 18) formed in the inner plate (81) and corresponding to the through-hole (72), wherein the front fastening part (60-1) of the side bracket (82) is inserted (i.e., via (84)) into the long hole (i.e., the space to the left of (45b-1)) of the inner plate (81; see Fig. 18 and note that the fastening part (60-1) protrudes through (72) and (84) into the long hole to the left of (45b-1); again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 4, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the front fastening part (60-1) has a cylindrical shape (i.e., a screw shape), and a diameter of the through-hole (72) is substantially equal to a diameter of the front fastening part (60-1), wherein a length (i.e., a vertical length) of the long hole (i.e., the space to the left of (45b-1)) is greater than the diameter of the front fastening part (60-1), and a width (i.e., an arbitrary width) of the long hole (i.e., the space to the left of (45b-1)) is substantially equal to the diameter of the front fastening part (see (60-1); and again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 5, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the outer plate (80) has a slip hole (i.e., a spacing to the left of (80) and to the right of (82)) disposed adjacent to the side frame (i.e., the main frame (70)) and formed through the outer plate (80), wherein the main frame (70) comprises: a horizontal part (i.e., any arbitrary horizontal part of (70)) disposed between the side bracket (82) and the inner plate (81); and a vertical part (i.e., any arbitrary vertical part of (70)) covering a side surface of the inner plate (81) and the outer plate (80), the vertical part (i.e., the arbitrary vertical part of (70)) connected to the horizontal part (i.e., the arbitrary horizontal part of (70)), wherein the side bracket (82) comprises a rear fastening part (60-1) that extends by protruding toward the outer plate (80), and is inserted into the slip hole (i.e., the spacing to the left of (80) and to the right of (82), see the space to the left of (45b-1); again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 6, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) a sliding mount (83) to which the second end (i.e., the left end) of the wing (140, 133) is slidably coupled (again, see Fig. 5 and Fig. 6), wherein the rear fastening part (60-1) of the side bracket (82) passes through the slip hole (i.e., the spacing to the left of (80) and to the right of (82), see the space to the left of (45b-1)) to be fixed to the sliding mount (83; again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 7, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the rear fastening part (60-1) has a cylindrical shape (i.e., a screw shape), wherein a length (i.e., a vertical length) of the slip hole (i.e., again, see the space to the left of (45b-1)) is greater than a diameter of the rear fastening part (60-1), and a width (i.e., an arbitrary width) of the slip hole (i.e., again, see the space to the left of (45b-1)) is substantially equal to a width of the rear fastening part (see (60-1); and again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). As pertaining to Claim 8, Jung discloses (see Fig. 16, Fig. 17, and Fig. 18) that the sliding mount (83) is fixed (i.e., via (60-1) and/or (45a-1)) to a rear surface of the outer plate (80; again, see Page 6 through Page 7, Para. [0154]-[0158], [0162]-[0163], and [0167]-[0173]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung in view of Kang et al. (hereinafter “Kang” US 2017 / 0347466). As pertaining to Claim 9, Jung does not explicitly disclose a magnet disposed between the side bracket and the outer plate, the magnet fixed to the side bracket, wherein the outer plate comprises metal. However, in the same field of endeavor, Kang discloses (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 along with Fig. 20 and Fig. 21) a display device (100) comprising a flexible display panel (110) and a flexible outer plate (120; see Page 3, Para. [0062]-[0064]) wherein a magnet (176, 178) is disposed between sides of the outer plate (120) and the outer plate (120), the magnet being fixed, wherein the output plate (120) comprises metal (see Page 6, Para. [0119]). It is a goal of Kang to provide a means for freely changing a curvature of a display device using a structure that allows for the prevention of damage to the display device. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jung with the teachings of Kang, such that a magnet is disposed between the side bracket and the outer plate, the magnet fixed to the side bracket, wherein the outer plate comprises metal, in order to provide a means for freely changing a curvature of a display device using a structure that allows for the prevention of damage to the display device. As pertaining to Claim 10, Jung does not explicitly disclose that the display panel is coupled to the inner plate by an adhesive member, wherein the inner plate is coupled to the side bracket by the adhesive member. However, in the same field of endeavor, Kang discloses (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 along with Fig. 20 and Fig. 21) a display device (100) comprising a flexible display panel (110) and a flexible inner plate (120; see Page 3, Para. [0062]-[0064]) wherein the display panel (110) is coupled to the inner plate (120) by an adhesive member (172, 174), wherein the inner plate (120) is coupled to a side bracket (130) by the adhesive member (see (172, 174); and see Page 6, Para. [0115]-[0119]). It is a goal of Kang to provide a means for freely changing a curvature of a display device using a structure that allows for the prevention of damage to the display device. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jung with the teachings of Kang, such that the display panel is coupled to the inner plate by an adhesive member, wherein the inner plate is coupled to the side bracket by the adhesive member, in order to provide a means for freely changing a curvature of a display device using a structure that allows for the prevention of damage to the display device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The reference to Yoon et al. (US 12,356,566), commonly assigned with the instant application, recites an invention at independent Claim 1 that is similar to that of Claim 1 of the instant application. While the claimed inventions recite similar features, Claim 1 of Yoon et al. recites a number of adhesive members and a rear plate that are not presented in Claim 1 of the instant application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M MANDEVILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3136. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:30AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M MANDEVILLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682822
GOA CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY PANEL
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675132
COMPUTING DEVICE SLIDER PLATE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670846
TILED DISPLAY PANEL
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663649
Eyewear with Display-Optimized Lenses
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664931
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A VARIABLE DRIVING FREQUENCY
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.6%)
3y 4m (~1y 12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month