Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/106,637

BRUSH UNIT AND CONNECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Priority
Sep 22, 2022 — JP 2022-151603 +1 more
Examiner
JOHNSON, ERIC
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NSK Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 883 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
899
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5 should be changed to “A connection device electrically connecting [[a]]the rotary shaft and [[a]]the conductor, the connection device comprising: [[a]]the shaft conductive part” since the rotary shaft, conductor and shaft conductive part are previously recited in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP0718024 (‘024, using machine translation) in view of JP4831505 (‘505, using machine translation). Re claim 1, ‘024 discloses a brush unit attached to a conductor 8 and abutting on a shaft conductive part 5 provided on a rotary shaft 3 to electrically connect the conductor 11 and the shaft conductive part 5 (fig 1, [0009-0012]), the brush unit comprising: a holder 11 of a concave shape attached to the conductor 8 (fig 1, [0009-0010]), having conductivity ([0012]), and having an opening part 13 provided on a side of the shaft conductive part 5 (fig 1); a brush 14 accommodated in the holder 11 (fig 1, [0010]), abutting on the shaft conductive part 5 via the opening part 13 (fig 1), and having conductivity ([0010]); and a biasing part 15 having conductivity, arranged between a bottom 16 in the holder 11 and the brush 14 (fig 1, [0010] & [0012]), and biasing the brush 14 toward a side of the opening part 13 (fig 1), wherein the brush includes: a first brush part having an abutting surface abutting on the shaft conductive part 5 (fig 1, front part of 14); and a second brush part having one end portion connected to the first brush part and the other end portion biased by the biasing part 15 (fig 1, back part of 14). ‘024 discloses claim 1 except for: the second brush part having an outer shape larger than an outer shape of the first brush part in a direction orthogonal to a biasing direction of the biasing part, the holder includes a projecting part projecting inward from the opening part, and the projecting part being opposed to a surface of the second brush part to which the first brush part is connected in the biasing direction of the biasing part. ‘505 discloses the second brush part 1a having an outer shape larger than an outer shape of the first brush part (figs 2-3, portion of 1 extending out of 3) in a direction orthogonal to a biasing direction of the biasing part 8 (figs 2-3), the holder 2 includes a projecting part 2a projecting inward from the opening part (figs 2-3), and the projecting part 2a being opposed to a surface of the second brush part 1a to which the first brush part is connected in the biasing direction of the biasing part 8 (figs 2-3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the brush and holder of ‘024 so the second brush part having an outer shape larger than an outer shape of the first brush part in a direction orthogonal to a biasing direction of the biasing part; the holder includes a projecting part projecting inward from the opening part, and the projecting part being opposed to a surface of the second brush part to which the first brush part is connected in the biasing direction of the biasing part, as disclosed by ‘505, in order to prevent the brush from wearing down beyond the brush wear limit, as taught by ‘505 (pg 2, lns 6-8) Re claim 4, ‘024 in view of ‘505 discloses claim 1 as discussed above and further discloses an electrode 5 arranged at a bottom of the holder 2 of a concave shape (‘505, figs 2-3, [0001] & [0002], lns 4-10); and a wiring 6 electrically connecting the electrode 5 and the brush 1 (‘505, figs 2-3, [0002], ln 4-10), wherein the biasing part 8 is arranged between the electrode 6 and the brush 1 (‘505, figs 2-3). Re claim 5, ‘024 in view of ‘505 discloses claim 1 as discussed above and further discloses a connection device electrically connecting a rotary shaft 3 and a conductor 8 (‘024, fig 1, [0009-0012]), the connection device comprising: a shaft conductive part 5 having a recess (‘024, fig 1, recess formed by 5a), attached to an end portion of the rotary shaft 3 such that an opening part of the recess faces outward (‘024, fig 1), and having conductivity (‘024, [0009-0012]); and the brush unit according to claim 1 (‘024, fig 1; ‘505, figs 2-3), the brush unit having one end portion inserted into the recess of the shaft conductive part 5 to abut on a bottom of the recess (‘024, fig 1), and the other end portion attached to the conductor 8 to electrically connect the shaft conductive part 5 and the conductor 8 (‘024, fig 1, [0009-0012]). Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ‘024 in view of ‘505 and in further view of Takahashi et al. (JP09149583, “Takahashi”, using machine translation). Re claim 2, ‘024 in view of ‘505 discloses claim 1 as discussed above. ‘024 further discloses the biasing part 15 is a spring of a coil shape (‘024, fig 1, [0010]). ‘024 is silent with respect to at the bottom of the holder, a protrusion to which an end portion of the spring is fitted on an outer side is provided. Takahashi discloses the terminal body 3 has a protrusion 5 to which an end portion of the spring 4 is fitted on an outer side is provided (fig 1, [0007]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure at the bottom of the holder of ‘024 in view of ‘505 a protrusion to which an end portion of the spring is fitted on an outer side is provided, as disclosed by Takahashi for a terminal body, in order to restring the spring, as taught by Takahashi ([0008]). Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ‘024 in view of ‘505 and in further view of Nakamura (JP2021118555, “Nakamura”, using machine translation). Re claim 3, ‘024 in view of ‘505 discloses claim 1 as discussed above and further discloses the biasing part is a spring of a coil shape (‘024, fig 1, [0010]; ‘505, figs 2-3, [0002]), an outer diameter of the spring, in the direction orthogonal to the biasing direction of the biasing part, is smaller than an outer shape of the second brush part (‘505, figs 2-3). ‘024 in view of ‘505 is silent with respect to the holder has a spring surrounding part surrounding an outer peripheral part of the spring, and an inner dimension of the spring surrounding part, in the direction orthogonal to the biasing direction of the biasing part, is smaller than an inner dimension of a part surrounding the second brush part in the holder. Nakamura discloses the holder 240 has a spring surrounding part 46 surrounding an outer peripheral part of the spring (figs 10-11, [0073]), and an inner dimension of the spring surrounding part 45, in the direction orthogonal to the biasing direction of the biasing part 45, is smaller than an inner dimension of a part surrounding the second brush part 231 in the holder 240 (figs 10-11, [0073]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the holder of ‘024 in view of ‘505 to have a spring surrounding part surrounding an outer peripheral part of the spring, and an inner dimension of the spring surrounding part, in the direction orthogonal to the biasing direction of the biasing part, is smaller than an inner dimension of a part surrounding the second brush part in the holder, as disclosed by Nakamura, in order to reduce the size the holder occupies, as taught by Nakamura ([0075]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5715. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 8:30-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached on (571)270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC JOHNSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749932
MAGNETIC CORE, HOOP MATERIAL, AND MAGNETIC COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738800
TERMINAL CONNECTION STRUCTURE OF MOTOR CASING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732065
SYSTEMS FOR ROTOR ASSEMBLY INCLUDING A LUBRICANT DISTRIBUTOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732062
DRIVING DEVICE INCLUDING A CLUTCH WITH A MOVEABLE MEMBER COUPLEABLE AND DECOUPLEABLE FROM A ROTOR ACCORDING TO OPERATION OF CLOTHING TREATMENT DEVICE AND CLOTHING TREATMENT DEVICE INCLUDING THE DRIVING DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715280
A COOLING SYSTEM FOR A DRIVE MOTOR OF AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.7%)
2y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month