Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/106,749

CONVERTIBLE PACK SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Examiner
MAI, TRI M
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allow Rate
521 granted / 1440 resolved
-33.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.1%
+25.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1440 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “a lock mechanism” in claim 1 and “a coupling module configured to releasably couple the base of the handle to the body of the frame” in claim 15. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-16, and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 7 recites “a lock mechanism releasably securable to at least one of the receiver and the pivot shaft such that the pivot shaft is secured in the first mouth of the collar, the lock mechanism comprising a latch is manually operable to lock and unlock the lock mechanism.” Claim 15 recites “a latch is manually operable to lock and unlock the lock mechanism” PNG media_image1.png 561 646 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 227 358 media_image2.png Greyscale Note of applicant’s specification: With additional reference to FIG. 5, the lock mechanism 254 of the clasp 250 includes a release lever 256 and a latch 257. The release lever 256 is manually operable, more specifically, manually pivotable relative to the body portion 252 of the clasp 250, to cause the latch 257 to engage and disengage the pivot shaft 230 and/or the receiver 234. The lock mechanism 254 thereby retains and releases, respectively, the body portion 252 of the clasp 250 over the pivot shaft 230, the first collar 238, and the second collar 240, and the coupling module 232 thereby couples and uncouples, respectively, the handle 218 to the body 202 of the frame 200. The specification fails to describe how the latch and the lock mechanism operates. The specification describes a lever to cause the latch 257 to engage and disengage the pivot shaft 230. From the drawings, it is unclear how a) the lever 257 connected to cause the latch 257 to engage and disengage the pivot shaft 230, b) lock mechanism 254 releasably securable to at least one of the receivers 234. Fig. 4 shows lock mechanism 254 is a door on a window of housing 232 does not have any locking structures. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. SET 1: Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rizzi (20250017341), or in the alternative under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rizzi in view of Lin (5560459). PNG media_image3.png 1056 577 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 582 582 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 674 751 media_image5.png Greyscale a central body 7 fixed to said wall and to which two rotatable side ends 8 are connected, able to rotate about an axis parallel to the side wall. [0037] In the preferred embodiment of FIG. 7, a suitcase 1 of the invention has an adjustment bar 12 that connects the two central bodies 7 that are detachably fixed to the side wall. [0039] In this embodiment the central bodies 7 can be fixed to the side wall by reversible coupling means, such as, for example, a snap-in element, Velcro, snap buttons and the like. Rizzi teaches pack system comprises a frame (where the wheels mounted to) comprising a body (the body of the suitcase), a handle assembly 4, comprising a hand grip 11, a base 7, a shank 10 extending between the handgrip and the base, a coupling module (cited above para. 39) configured to releasably couple the base of the handle to the body of the frame such that the handle can be pivoted between a first angular position and a second angular position offset by at least 90 degrees (figs. 2, 3, or 7), the coupling module being manually releasable to uncouple the handle assembly from the body of the frame. In the alternative, Lin teaches that it is known in the art to provide a frame and body. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide a frame and body as taught by Lin to provide common structures for a luggage. Regarding claim 16, note body 1 comprises a top, a bottom, a back side, and a front side, the handle assembly being coupled to the body by the coupling module such that the handle is pivotable toward the bottom of the body against the back side of the body. Set 2: Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin (4813520). PNG media_image6.png 1013 578 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, Lin teaches pack system comprises a frame comprising a body (2), and a handle assembly 28, comprising a hand grip, a base 181, and a shank 18 extending between the handgrip and the base, a coupling module (152) configured to releasably couple the base of the handle to the body of the frame such that the handle can be pivoted between a first angular position and a second angular position offset by at least 90 degrees (note that nothing obstruct the handle 181/152 connection until the handle meets body which is more than 90 degrees as claimed), the coupling module being manually releasable to uncouple the handle assembly from the body of the frame. Regarding claim 16, note body comprises a top, a bottom, a back side, and a front side, the handle assembly being coupled to the body by the coupling module such that the handle is pivotable toward the bottom of the body against the back side of the body. Note that the luggage of Lin can positioned relatively in different manner. In this case the luggage can be positioned such that the portion with the zipper to be the top wall (for the placement of contents), the opposite is the bottom. Thus, the movement of the handle to rest on portion 2 (fig. 1) comprising this movement toward the bottom (at least one of the legs 18) and against the back side 2 of the body. SET 3: Claims 1-3, 6, and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Krutikova (12334577). PNG media_image7.png 1048 785 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 494 734 media_image8.png Greyscale such that the clamp assembly 110 can capture the cross-member 120 with the handle 112 in multiple rotational positions. Regarding claim 1, Krutikova teaches a handle comprising a hand grip 122 a base 120 comprising a pivot shaft 120 and shanks (112) extending between the hand grip and the base; and a coupling module (110) configured to releasably couple the handle base to a frame of a luggage system (note that the claimed is only directed to a handle and the luggage is an intended use) such that the handle can be pivoted, the coupling module comprising a receiver 124 comprising a first collar 110 with a first mouth 126, the pivot shaft receivable in the first mouth of the first collar, and a lock mechanism 134 releasably securable to at least one of the receiver and the pivot shaft such that the pivot shaft is secured in the first mouth of the collar, the lock mechanism comprising a latch 138 is manually operable to lock and unlock the lock mechanism. Regarding claim 2, note the two legs 112 of the handle. Regarding claim 3, note the pivot shaft 120 is cylindrical in shape. Regarding claim 6, note coupling module 110 is receivable over the pivot shaft and the first collar, and the latch 138 is operable to engage with and disengage from the pivot shaft to retain and release, respectively, the coupling module over the pivot shaft and the first collar upon actuating the latch. Regarding claim 15, Krutikova teaches pack system comprises a frame (102) comprising a body 104, and a handle assembly 118, comprising a hand grip, a base 120, and a shank 112 extending between the handgrip and the base, a coupling module (110) configured to releasably couple the base of the handle to the body of the frame such that the handle can be pivoted between a first angular position and a second angular position offset by at least 90 degrees (note the handle in fig. 6-7 can rotate more than 90 degree about 110. Also, note that the handle can rotate prior to the locking of the lamp 110 also in more than 90 degree), the coupling module being manually releasable to uncouple the handle assembly from the body of the frame. Regarding claim 16, note body comprises a top, a bottom, a back side, and a front side, the handle assembly being coupled to the body by the coupling module such that the handle is pivotable toward the bottom of the body against the back side of the body. Handle in fig. 7 can be rotated until the handle 122 against the back side of the body as claimed. Claims 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Krutikova in view of Mizuguchi (8695167). Krutikova meets all claimed limitations except for the second collar with a second mouth and, the pivot shaft receivable in the second mouth of the second collar. PNG media_image9.png 686 606 media_image9.png Greyscale Mizuguchi teaches that it is known in the art to provide a two coupling at 91 for a handle. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide another coupling 110 of Krutikova to provide added security. Regarding claim 5, note the elongate portion where the collar 110 is mounted in fig. 3. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use this elongate portion as the bridge for the two collars 110 in the modified Krutikova in view of Mizuguchi to provide the placement to enable the operation of the two collars. PNG media_image10.png 376 465 media_image10.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI M MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-4541. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm (Mon-Friday). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TRI M. MAI Examiner Art Unit 3733 /TRI M MAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582579
PREMATURE INFANT PACIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569042
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MOBILE OFFICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564250
SPLIT HANDLE, NARROW ROLLING BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12550986
Fashion Carry Bag Assembly with Detachable Purse
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544315
INFANT FEEDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+20.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month