Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/106,878

FREQUENCY SELECTIVE SURFACE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Priority
Sep 12, 2022 — JP 2022-144401 +1 more
Examiner
MUNOZ, DANIEL
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 566 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
582
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
54.7%
+14.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 566 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-4, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lam et al. (U.S. Patent Application No. 20120037420, made of record in IDS dated 22 October 2025), hereinafter known as Lam. Regarding claim 1, Lam discloses (Figs. 1-6) a frequency selective surface (100) comprising a substrate (102) having a first region (layer which 100 lies) and a second region (layer which 650 lies); at least one first conductor pattern (100) arranged in the first region of the substrate, the at least one first conductor (100) pattern including a plurality of first cells (fig.1A), each of the first cells being formed by a plurality of first conductive lines (106); and at least one second conductor pattern (650) arranged in the second region of the substrate (see Fig. 6), the at least one second conductor pattern including a plurality of second cells, each of the second cells being formed by a plurality of second conductive lines (see Fig. 6), the plurality of first cells being configured such that the first cells adjacent to each other are electrically continuous with each other (see Fig. 6), the at least one first conductor patter being configured such that an overall size of the first conductor pattern is smaller than a wavelength of electromagnetic waves entering the frequency selective surface and is a size capable of reflecting the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves ([0023]), the plurality of second cells being configured such that the second conductive lines forming the second cells adjacent to each other are not electrically continuous with each other ([0039]), the at least one second conductor pattern being configured such that a size of each of the second cells is smaller than the overall size of the first conductor pattern and is a size capable of transmitting the wavelength of the electromagnetic waves ([0037]). Regarding claim 3, Lam discloses (Figs. 1-6) that plurality of second conductive lines are configured to extend along a first direction and a second direction intersecting the first direction (the second conductive members of 650 are forming crosses), and a space between an end of the second conductive line extending along the first direction and the second conductive line extending along the second direction is set to be 1 µm or more in the first direction (see Fig. 11). Regarding claim 4, Lam discloses (Figs. 1-6) a substrate formed in a film shape is anticipated by D1 (Section II.A: epoxy resin substrate), D2 (non-conductive substrate). Regarding claim 8, Lam discloses (Figs. 1-6) that the substrate has a plurality of the first conductor patterns, the plurality of first conductor patterns are spaced apart from each other on the substrate, and each of the plurality of first conductor patterns is provided with a connecting element (130) configured to connect electrically each of the plurality of first conductor patterns and an external control circuit (via second signal 122) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lam. Lam teaches the limitations of claim 4, but does not teach further details of the substrate. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of invention to one of ordinary skill in the art include grooves in the substrate since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to employ/use a known technique to improve similar devices (methods, products) in the same way is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 415-421, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007) Including grooves in the substrate to accommodate the conductors ensures the substrate remains level, simplifying integration. Regarding claim 6, Lam teaches (Figs. 1-6) the main component of a conductive material forming the conductive layer of each first conductive line being the same as a main component of a conductive material forming the conductive layer of each second conductive line ([0028]). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lam as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Voeltzel (U.S. Patent Application No. 20030080909, made of record in IDS dated 22 October 2025), hereinafter known as Voeltzel. Lam teaches the limitations of claim 5, but does not teach a blackened layer. Voeltzel teaches (Figs. 1-6) wherein each of the first conductive lines and the second conductive lines further includes a blackened layer stacked on the conductive layer on an opening side of the recessed groove (22, [0003] [0026]-[0027]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of invention to one of ordinary skill in the art use the blackened layer of Voeltzel on the conducting layer of Lam because it ([0006]) “reduce[s] heat build-up in the interior of the vehicle”. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Oh et al. (U.S. Patent Application No. 20220200157) teaches a mesh reflective pattern. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL MUNOZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1957. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached at 571-270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL MUNOZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763489
PRISM FOR REPOINTING REFLECTOR ANTENNA MAIN BEAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763487
METHOD FOR COMPENSATE CAVITY EFFECT IN AIRCRAFT EMBEDDED ANTENNA IMPEDANCE AND EMBEDDED ANTENNA ARRAY FOR AIRCRAFT
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756088
LOW-COST MINIATURIZED VERTICAL COAXIAL CABLE TO PCB TRANSITION FOR USE IN ULTRA-DENSE BASE STATION ANTENNAS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756101
ANTENNA, ANTENNA ARRAY, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749806
MILLIMETER-WAVE ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND MILLIMETER-WAVE ANTENNA MODULE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 566 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month