Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/107,033

HYDRAULIC CONTROL OF PLATE-FORM DESIGN

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Aug 30, 2022 — DE 10 2022 121 840.6 +1 more
Examiner
NICHOLS, PHYLLIS M
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 829 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
843
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
63.4%
+23.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 829 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 7 and 9 are objected to because of the following informalities: these claims do not recite a dependency but do not appear to be independent. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, and 11-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shigyo (US PG-pub 20100288950). Regarding claim 1-4 and 11-13 Shigyo teaches a control unit of plate-form construction (fig. 1), comprising:a control plate arrangement having:at least two control plates 2, 6, between which an intermediate element 4 is arranged, the intermediate element having apertures (ends 46) and bears with a first sealing face against a first control plate 2 of the at least two control and plates and with a second sealing face against a second control plate 6 of the at least two control plates, and an electrical conductor device 46a, 46b is incorporated configured into the intermediate element 4; (claim 11) an electrical conductor device 46b with a plastic material (epoxy resin; para. 0071); (claims 2 and 12) a through hole 46 extending through both the electrical conductor device and the plastic material (resin epoxy; para. 0073), the through hole providing a hydraulic resistance (to the extent of applicant’s device); (claim 3) electrical conducter device 46 is formed of a metallic material (para. 0073); (claims 4 and 13) the electrical conductor device is designed as a lead frame (para. 0073). Regarding the recitation “… overmolded”, the term “overmolded” is considered to be directed to the method of manufacture of the claimed structure in this apparatus claim. As set forth in M.P.E.P. §2113: “M.P.E.P. §2113 Product by Process Claims [ R-1 ] PRODUCT-BY-PROCESS CLAIMS ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE MANIPULATIONS OF THE RECITED STEPS, ONLY THE STRUCTURE IMPLIED BY THE STEPS "Even though product-by process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe , 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (citations omitted). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-6, 8, and 14-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Shigyo fails to disclose (claim 5) functioning as the reinforcement is formed from a stamping waste material; (claim 14) he plastic material of the lead frame further comprises a region reinforced by metal. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to P. MACADE NICHOLS whose telephone number is (571)270-5428. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-5:00 P.M.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /P. MACADE NICHOLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679635
Water tank, ventilation area design method thereof, storage medium and electronic apparatus
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679598
METHOD, ASSEMBLY AND KIT FOR TRANSPORTING A GAS DISTRIBUTION DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674516
CHECK VALVE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662925
FLUID COUPLING ASSEMBLIES FOR A MANIFOLD OF A HYDRAULIC FRACTURING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650176
FLUID CONTROL VALVE, FLUID CONTROL DEVICE AND DRIVE CIRCUIT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.4%)
5y 0m (~3y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 829 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month