Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/107,104

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SERVICE POLICY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Sep 08, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022117890
Examiner
ANYAN, BARBARA BURGESS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
54%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
575 granted / 738 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -24% lift
Without
With
+-24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
744
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 738 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/27/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 11-13, 24-29 are rejected by 102(a)(1) as being anticipated byBhide et al. (hereinafter “Bhide”, US Patent Application 20220147597 A1). As per claims 1, 24, 25, Bhide discloses A method, communication apparatus, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for updating an artificial intelligence (AI) service policy, performed by an application function (AF) network element, comprising: sending an AI service policy update request to a network exposure function (NEF) network element, wherein the AI service policy update request comprises an identifier of the AF network element, and updated policy information (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics). receiving a policy update response returned by the NEF network element (paragraphs [0030, 0037], The AI policy engine detects changes and in response, initiates a review of models and provides an API which enables users to check if models meet the policies. Notification is outputted to a device. The notification is in response to an on-demand request for validation via the API). As per claim 2, Bhide discloses The method of claim 1, wherein the AI service policy update request further comprises at least one of: a public land mobile network (PLMN) identifier, or a service based interface (SBI) address (paragraph [0027]). As per claim 3, Bhide discloses The method of claim 1, As per claims 4, 26,28, Bhide discloses A method, communication apparatus, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for updating an artificial intelligence (AI) service policy, performed by a network exposure function (NEF) network element, comprising: receiving an AI service policy update request sent by an application function (AF) network element, wherein the AI service policy update request comprises an identifier of the AF network element and updated policy information (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics); sending the identifier of the AF network element and the updated policy information to a unified data repository (UDR) network element (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics); returning a policy update response to the AF network element (paragraphs [0030, 0037], The AI policy engine detects changes and in response, initiates a review of models and provides an API which enables users to check if models meet the policies. Notification is outputted to a device. The notification is in response to an on-demand request for validation via the API). As per claim 5, Bhide discloses The method of claim 4, wherein sending the identifier of the AF network element and the updated policy information to the UDR network element comprises: sending the identifier of the AF network element and the updated policy information to the UDR network element in a case that it is determined that the AI service policy update request is legal (paragraphs [0016, 0023]). As per claim 6, Bhide discloses The method of claim 5, further comprising at least one of: determining that the AI service policy update request is legal in response to that a preset registered AF list comprises the identifier of the AF network element (paragraphs [0027, 0029]); or determining that the AI service policy update request is illegal in response to that a preset registered AF list does not comprise the identifier of the AF network element (paragraphs [0029, 0038]). As per claim 7, Bhide discloses The method of claim 4, wherein the AI service policy update request further comprises at least one of: a public land mobile network (PLMN) identifier, or a service based interface (SBI) address (paragraph [0027]). As per claim 8, Bhide discloses The method of any one of claim 4, . 9-10. (Canceled) As per claims 11, 27, 29, Bhide discloses A method, communication apparatus, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for updating an artificial intelligence (AI) service policy, performed by a policy control function (PCF) network element, comprising: receiving an identifier of an application function (AF) network element and updated policy information sent by a unified data repository (UDR) network element (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics); updating a policy control and charging (PCC) rule associated with the identifier of the AF network element according to the updated policy information (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics); sending the identifier of the AF network element and the PCC rule updated to a session management function (SMF) network element (paragraphs [0021, 0027, 0030, 0037-38], A control unit is used to evaluate an AI model against the rules and policies which are encoded into the AI policy engine. Model metadata is editable by model metrics computation tools which includes fields identifying service IDs registered to authorized systems to update model metrics). As per claim 12, Bhide discloses The method of claim 11, wherein sending the identifier of the AF network element and the PCC rule updated to the SMF network element comprises: sending the identifier of the AF network element and the PCC rule updated to the SMF network element in response to that an AI service associated with the identifier of the AF network element is in an invoked state (paragraphs [0022, 0030, 0041]. As per claim 13, Bhide discloses The method of claim 11 14-23. (Canceled) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BARBARA BURGESS ANYAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3996. The examiner can normally be reached IFP M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached at 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. August 8, 2026 /BARBARA B Anyan/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748855
HIERARCHICAL REPRESENTATION MODELS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12726491
NETWORK ANTI-REPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726457
MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND MANAGEMENT METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12711216
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12701120
THIRD-PARTY ACCESS-CONTROL SUPPORT USING ROLE HISTORY ANALYSIS
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
54%
With Interview (-24.0%)
3y 5m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 738 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month