Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/107,119

PLATE CARRIER SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Sep 02, 2022 — provisional 63/403,595 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO-THIEU L
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Edge-Works Manufacturing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
453 granted / 689 resolved
-4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
734
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 689 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05-12-2025 and 02-27-2025 are acknowledged. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, Claims 1-11 in the reply filed on 04-03-2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the group . This is not found persuasive because each of the species can function differently without the other. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Crye et al. (2015/0153140). Regarding claim 1, Crye discloses a plate carrier system (figs 5-15) having a lay flat yoke, comprising: a yoke (member 54, left side), said yoke comprising a pair of straps (members 44, left side) extending from said yoke, said yoke comprising a substantially flat attachment portion (member 72, left side); a plate bag, said plate bag comprising an inner panel (member 24), said inner panel having a width; a plate bag fastener connecting said yoke to said inner panel (figs 10-11); and wherein said attachment portion of said yoke is in substantially continuous contact with said inner panel along said width of said inner panel (figs 6-7). Regarding claim 2, Crye discloses a second yoke, said second yoke (member 54, right side) attached to said pair of straps (member 44, right side), said second yoke comprising a second substantially flat attachment portion (member 72, right side side); a second plate bag, said second plate bag comprising a second inner panel (member 22), said second inner panel having a second width; a second plate bag fastener connecting said second yoke to said second inner panel (figs 10-11); and wherein said attachment portion of said second yoke is in substantially continuous contact with said second inner panel along said second width of said second inner panel (figs 6-7). Regarding claim 3, Crye discloses said yoke, said second yoke, and said pair of straps are operable to continuously contact a user wearing said plate carrier system to lay flat on a user (figs 13-14). Regarding claim 5, Crye discloses a strap fastener in each strap of said pair of straps, said strap fasteners operable to selectively connect and disconnect said yoke to said second yoke, and said strap fasteners operable to selectively adjust a length of said pair of straps (para 0031-0035). Regarding claim 6, Crye discloses at least one sleeve (member 42) operable to cover said strap fasteners (fig 7). Regarding claim 7, Crye discloses said strap fasteners are hook and loop fasteners (para 0031-0035). Regarding claim 8, Crye discloses a doff strap (member 44) operable to connect to and quick release said strap fasteners, said doff strap comprising: a body, said body having a first end opposite a second end (fig 6); a pull tab (member 44) disposed at said first end of said body; a connector (member 46) disposed at said second end of said body, said connector having a first side opposite a second side; a hook fastener disposed on said first side of said connector; a loop fastener disposed on said second side of said connector; wherein said connector is operable to connect to said strap fasteners, wherein said body is operable to fold over said strap fasteners, wherein said body is operable to fit within said sleeves, and wherein, upon a pull of said pull tab by a user, said doff strap is operable to disconnect said strap fasteners to release said plate carrier system (para 0030-0031 and 0037-0039). Regarding claim 9, Crye discloses said plate bag fasteners are stitching 9para 0031). Regarding claim 10, Crye discloses said yokes are operable extend over the shoulder cavity over a user (figs 13-14). Regarding claim 11, Crye discloses a plurality of grooves (member 60) defined by said yoke and said second yoke. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crye et al. (2015/0153140) as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Maier et al. (4,493,115). Regarding claim 4, Crye teaches all limitations of the claim except said first yoke and said second yoke each comprise a single layer of fabric. However, Crye further show that the yokes making of one layer (members 54 and 56). Maier teaches a yoke having a fabric material (claim 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claim invention to modify the system of Crye by using a yoke making of a fabric material, as taught by Maier, in order to reduce materially the peak shock per unit area delivered to the shoulder of the user. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon, is listed on the attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO-THIEU L NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-0476. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA D. HUYNH can be reached at (571)272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BAO-THIEU L. NGUYEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3732 /BAO-THIEU L NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635763
FOOTWEAR ARTICLE FOR WALKING
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628909
SOLE STRUCTURE FOR A DECONSTRUCTABLE FOOTWEAR ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611004
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR WITH MIDSOLE HAVING VARYING HARDNESS
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611005
CUSHIONING COMPONENT FOR A WEARABLE ARTICLE
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599193
METHOD CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF A SOLE OBTAINED BENDING THE EDGES OF A FLAT NON-TRIMMED SOLE ON AN UPPER FOR OBTAINING A SHOE AND A THUS OBTAINED SHOE
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.2%)
2y 4m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 689 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month