Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/107,225

Method and Device for Preparing and Dispensing a Post-Mixed Beverage

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Sep 02, 2022 — EU 22193719.6 +1 more
Examiner
CARROLL, JEREMY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Heineken Supply Chain B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
524 granted / 699 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13-14, 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jersey et al (US 20150210522 A1). Claim 13, Jersey discloses - a dispensing line (314, 308, 120, 128, 108) with a dispensing outlet at a downstream end of the dispensing line; - a base liquid input (302, 314; FIG 2-3, 6); - a beverage concentrate input (104, 116, 118, 304, 604, 606, 608; FIG 2-3, 6); and - a secondary liquid input (112, 114, 122, 124, 146, 612, 614, 616, 618; FIG 2-3, 6); wherein the base liquid input is in fluid communication with the dispensing line (FIG 2-3, 6), the beverage concentrate input is in fluid communication with the dispensing line, and the secondary liquid input is in fluid communication with the dispensing line, and wherein the secondary liquid input is connected to the dispensing line downstream relative to the base liquid input and the beverage concentrate input (FIG 2-3, 6), and the secondary liquid input is connected upstream to the dispensing line relative to the dispensing outlet. Claim 14, Jersey discloses - the beverage dispenser is free of mixing chambers (FIG 2) for mixing together base liquid and beverage concentrate. Claim 16, Jersey discloses wherein the beverage dispenser is free of mixing chambers (FIG 2) for mixing together base liquid, beverage concentrate, and secondary liquid. Claim 17, Jersey discloses a beverage concentrate container (104; [0042]) comprising a volume of beverage concentrate, which beverage concentrate container is replaceable connected to the beverage concentrate input. Claim 18, Jersey discloses wherein the beverage concentrate is based on a beer (while not specifically discloses the structure is inherently capable of carrying out this function during its normal operation; [0011] to [0015]). Claim 19, Jersey discloses wherein the base liquid comprises carbonated water (132). Claim 20, Jersey discloses wherein the beverage concentrate comprises protein (while not specifically discloses the structure is inherently capable of carrying out this function during its normal operation; [0011] to [0015]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jersey et al as applied to claim 13 above. Claim 15, Jersey discloses the claimed invention except for wherein a maximum flow-through area for fluid is 0.1085 in2. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to change the size in order to provide the desired flow rate, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the size of a component. A change in size is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEREMY W CARROLL whose telephone number is (571)272-4988. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at (571) 272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEREMY W. CARROLL Primary Examiner Art Unit 3754 /Jeremy Carroll/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678813
OPENING/CLOSING AND VAPORIZING MECHANISM FOR A BOTTLE, FOR EXAMPLE OF PERFUME, AND SUCH A BOTTLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685072
WORKING STATION SYSTEMS FOR DISPENSING A FLUID IN CONNECTION WITH ELECTRONICS ASSEMBLY
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673860
APPARATUS FOR PIERCING A SEAL OF A LIQUID-FILLED CONTAINER
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667179
DISPENSING ASSEMBLY AND CONTAINER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662282
Cartridge System
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month