Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/107,245

SLIDING MEMBER, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND COATING FILM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 27, 2025
Priority
Sep 22, 2022 — JP 2022-151785 +1 more
Examiner
CUMAR, NATHAN
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nippon Piston Ring Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
960 granted / 1218 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3, and 5-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 (Okazaki et al., US Pub. 2020-0217416) alone. For Claim 1, D1 discloses a sliding member (Abstract) comprising: a coating film (1) on a sliding surface (16) on a base material (11), the coating film (1) including a plurality of laminated parts (3), and carbon layers (2) provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts, the plurality of laminated parts (3), when a cross section thereof is observed by a bright- field TEM image, being configured by laminating, in a thickness direction, repeating units of a black hard carbon layer shown in a relatively black color or blackish color and a white hard carbon layer shown in a relatively white color or whitish color, and the carbon layers each including a columnar structure (Laminated part 3 has black hard carbon layer B and white hard carbon layer W when observed by a bright-field TEM image. Abstract. Para. [0043]. Plurality of black hard carbon layer B and white hard carbon layer W are stacked in thickness direction. Figure 2.) D1 discloses the claimed invention with laminated parts 3 and carbon layer 2 except for a plurality of laminated parts (3), and carbon layers (2) provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventio to have a plurality of laminated parts and carbon layers such that the carbon layers provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts, since it has been held that mere duplication of essential working parts of a device involve only routine skill in the art. In re Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. One skill in the at would realize that having a plurality of laminated parts and carbon layers provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts would yield the expected result of effective sealing. For Claim 2, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of laminated parts has a thickness within a range of 2 to 9 µm (Para. [0067, 0069]), and the coating film has a thickness within a range of 4 to 40 µm (Para. [0022].) For Claim 3, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, wherein the carbon layer is formed by a black carbon layer shown in a relatively black color or blackish color and a white carbon layer shown in a relatively white color or whitish color, in this order, and the columnar structure shown in the relatively black color or blackish color is present in the white carbon layer (Abstract. Figure 2.) For Claim 5, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, wherein an initial carbon layer is formed as a lower layer before formation of the coating filmlayer (Layer 11a composed of carbide, para. [0052].) For Claim 6, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, wherein a laminated part inner carbon layer is formed in each of the plurality of laminated parts, on the white hard carbon layer (W) and as a lower layer of the black hard carbon layer (B, Figure 2.) For Claim 7, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, further comprising: a surface layer part serving as an outermost surface layer above the plurality of laminated parts, the surface layer part having a thickness of 0.1 to 10 µm (Outer most layer white hard carbon layer W has a thickness of 0.3 µm, para. [0059].) For Claim 8, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 1, wherein the sliding member is a piston ring (Sliding member is piston ring, para. [0005].) For Claim 9, D1 discloses a coating film (abstract) comprising: a plurality of laminated parts (3, Figure 2); and carbon layers (2) provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts, the plurality of laminated parts (3), when a cross section thereof is observed by a bright- field TEM image, being configured by laminating, in a thickness direction, repeating units of a black hard carbon layer shown in a relatively black color or blackish color and a white hard carbon layer shown in a relatively white color or whitish color, and the carbon layers each including a columnar structure (Laminated part 3 has black hard carbon layer B and white hard carbon layer W when observed by a bright-field TEM image. Abstract. Para. [0043]. Plurality of black hard carbon layer B and white hard carbon layer W are stacked in thickness direction. Figure 2.) D1 discloses the claimed invention with laminated parts 3 and carbon layer 2 except for a plurality of laminated parts (3), and carbon layers (2) provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed inventio to have a plurality of laminated parts and carbon layers such that the carbon layers provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts, since it has been held that mere duplication of essential working parts of a device involve only routine skill in the art. In re Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. One skill in the art would realize that having a plurality of laminated parts and carbon layers provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts would yield the expected result of effective sealing. For Claim 10, D1 discloses the coating film according to claim 9, wherein each of the plurality of laminated parts has a thickness within a range of 2 to 9 µm (Para. [0067, 0069]), and the coating film has a thickness within a range of 4 to 40 µm (Para. [0022].) For Claim 11, D1 discloses the coating film according to claim 9, wherein the carbon layer is formed by a black carbon layer shown in a relatively black color or blackish color and a white carbon layer shown in a relatively white color or whitish color, in this order, and the columnar structure shown in the relatively black color or blackish color is present in the white carbon layer (Abstract. Figure 2.) For Claim 12, D1 discloses the coating film according to claim 9, wherein an initial carbon layer is formed as a lower layer before formation of the coating film (Layer 11a composed of carbide, para. [0052].) For Claim 13, D1 discloses the coating film according to claim 9, wherein a laminated part inner carbon layer is formed in the plurality of laminated parts, on the white hard carbon layer (W) and as a lower layer of the black hard carbon layer (B, Figures 2.) For Claim 14, D1 discloses the coating film according to claim 9, further comprising: a surface layer part serving as an outermost surface layer above the plurality of laminated parts, the surface layer part having a thickness of 0.1 to 10 µm (Outer most layer white hard carbon layer W has a thickness of 0.3 µm, para. [0059].) For Claim 15, D1 discloses a manufacturing method of the sliding member according to claim 1 that includes the coating film (1) on the sliding surface (16) on the base material (11, abstract), the coating film (1) including a plurality of laminated parts (3), and carbon layers (2) provided between each of the plurality of laminated parts (3), the plurality of laminated parts (3), when a cross section thereof is observed by a bright-field TEM image, being configured by laminating, in a thickness direction, repeating units of a black hard carbon layer (B) shown in a relatively black color or blackish color and a white hard carbon layer (W) shown in a relatively white color or whitish color, and the carbon layers each including a columnar structure (Abstract. Figure 2), and the carbon layers (2) each being obtained by forming the plurality of laminated parts (B, W) having a predetermined thickness (Para. [0022, 0023, 0030]), pausing film formation for a certain period of time to allow a temperature (Para. [0016-0017, 0047, 0074-0077]) thereof to become relatively low, and then resuming film formation under predetermined conditions (Paar. [0017]) Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 (Okazaki et al., US Pub. 2020-0217416) in view of D2 (WO 2021066058). For Claim 4, D1 discloses the sliding member according to claim 3, but does not disclose wherein an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the black hard carbon layer is within a range of 0.05 to 0.75, an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the white hard carbon layer is larger than the [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the black hard carbon layer and within a range of 0.20 to 0.80, and an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the white carbon layer in the carbon layer is within a range of 0.20 to 0.80. D2 teaches a sliding member with coating having black hard carbon layer and white hard carbon layer. Black hard carbon has [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of 0.05-0.75, and white hard carbon layer has [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio 0.20-0.80 (P12, para. [6]) for effective sealing. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify D1 such that an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the black hard carbon layer is within a range of 0.05 to 0.75, an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the white hard carbon layer is larger than the [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the black hard carbon layer and within a range of 0.20 to 0.80, and an [sp2/(sp2+sp3)] ratio of the white carbon layer in the carbon layer is within a range of 0.20 to 0.80, as taught by D2 with a reasonable expectation of success of effective sealing. Conclusion Prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and provides example of invention. A few of the prior art cited but not applied include Moriguchi (US 2018-0371608); Shinohara (US 2018-0245200); and Moriguchi (US 2017-0283935). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN CUMAR whose telephone number is (571)270-3112. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KRISTINA FULTON can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN CUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747791
LIP SEALS AND RELATED METHODS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729570
LOCK FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723435
MERCHANDISE DISPLAY SECURITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720691
AUTOMATIC UNLOCKING SYSTEM FOR IT CABINET
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715678
MULTIPLE COMPARTMENT CONTAINER AND METHODS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 6m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month