Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/107,603

TRUSS DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Aug 30, 2022 — NL 2032904 +1 more
Examiner
DEMUREN, BABAJIDE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sixty82 B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
774 granted / 1048 resolved
+13.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1065
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1048 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/28/2025 was considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5, 7, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 5, 7, 12, and 13, the phrase "particularly" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Davies US20100326003. Claim 1. Davies discloses a truss device (100, 306, 905), comprising a set of elongate tube bodies (106, 306) which extend parallel to each other in a longitudinal direction and which are connected spatially separated from each other by bars (320), wherein the tube bodies (308) are provided or at least can be provided on opposite outer ends of coupling means for a releasable coupling to a tube body of a further truss device (100, 306, 905), wherein the bars (320) have a polygonal cross-section (see P.0023; "rectangular") and are connected to an adjacent tube body (106, 306) along an at least in projection linear connection (see Fig. 3) which coincides with a side of this cross-section at an end surface, and wherein the connections of a number of bars (320) connected to the tube body (106, 306) lie mutually in line (see Fig. 3). Claim 2. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the bars (320) are connected to the set of tube bodies (106, 306) at opposite end surfaces along at least in projection linear connections (see Fig. 3), which each coincide with a side of the cross- section of the bar (320) in question, and that corresponding connections of the bars (320) lie mutually in line (see Fig. 3). Claim 3. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the bars (320) are each connected to a tube body (106, 306) of the set of tube bodies along respectively a first at least in projection linear connection (see the connection of bars 320 to tube 306B2 on Fig. 3) and a second at least in projection linear connection (see the connection of bars 320 to tube 306B on Fig. 3), wherein the first connections (320-306B2) of the bars (320) lie mutually in line (see Fig. 3), wherein the second connections (320-306B) of the bars (320) lie mutually in line (see Fig. 3) and wherein the first and second connections are oriented parallel to each other (see Fig. 3). Claim 4. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the first connections (320-306B2) and the second connections (320-306B) are oriented parallel to the longitudinal direction of the tube body (306). Claim 5 as best understood. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the bars (320) have a rectangular (see par. 0023) cross-section. Claim 6. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the bars (320) comprises hollow tubular profiles. Claim 7 as best understood. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the tube bodies (106, 306) and the bars (320) are formed from the same material, particularly from metal such as steel or aluminum (see par. 0042), and are connected to each other at least substantially only along linear connections (see Fig. 3). Claim 8. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the tube bodies (106, 306) are connected in crosswise manner (see Fig. 3) by means of the bars (320). Claim 9. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the tube bodies (106, 306) are received in a shared end frame (See the angle frame on Fig. 9 where two beam trusses 905 are connected. That end cube truss or just a portion of it can be interpreted as representing the shared end frame of claim 9.) at their end surface and that the tube bodies (106, 306) and the end frame are connected to each other along at least one further at least in projection linear connection (see Fig. 9), which at least one further connection is oriented parallel to a connection along which at least one of the bars (320) is connected to one of the tube bodies (106, 306), and particularly lies in line therewith (see in combination Fig. 4 and Fig. 9). Claim 10. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the bars (320) are each connected to a tube body (106, 306) of the set of tube bodies along respectively a first at least in projection linear connection (320-306B2; see Fig. 3) and a second at least in projection linear connection (320-306B; see Fig. 3), wherein the first connections (320-306B2) and the second connections (320-306B) of the bars (320) each lie in line with a further at least in projection linear connection (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 9) of the end frame (SEF) to the tube body (106, 306), and wherein the first, second and further connections are oriented parallel to each other (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 9). Claim 11. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the further at least in projection linear connection essentially lies in line with the first at least in projection linear connection (320-306B2) and the first (and also second) (320-306B2, 320-306B) at least in projection linear connection (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 9). Claim 12 as best understood. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the tube bodies (106, 306) and the end frames (SEF) are formed from the same metal, particularly from aluminum (see par. 0042), and are welded to each other at least substantially by means of solely and at least in projection linear connections (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 9). Claim 13 as best understood. Davies discloses a truss device, wherein the end frames (SEF) are formed integrally in monolithic manner (see Fig. 9), and were particularly obtained by extrusion or casting. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to attached NOTICE OF REFERENCE CITED. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BABAJIDE A DEMUREN whose telephone number is (571)270-7017. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 5712726754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BABAJIDE A. DEMUREN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3633 /BABAJIDE A DEMUREN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698633
SUMP DRAIN APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12686105
FASTENER INSTALLATION TOOL AND METHOD OF FASTENING BOARDS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680296
BUILDING WALL AND BUILDING WALL CONSTRUCTION METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674324
ROOF DRAIN AND PROMENADE SUPPORT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668980
PORTABLE OUTDOOR FLOORING APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+22.2%)
2y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1048 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month