Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/107,990

SCREEN BRIGHTNESS ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Aug 29, 2022 — CN 202211047451.1 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, CHAN T H
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Shenzhen TCL Creative Cloud Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
432 granted / 500 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
515
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 500 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/18/2026 and 02/28/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 20, 22, 24 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fletcher et al. (“Fletcher”, US 2010/0315450) in view of Kim et al. (“Kim”, US 2014/0092270). Regarding claim 20, Fletcher discloses an electronic device (10), comprising a processor (18) and a memory (44) storing an application executable by the processor to perform operations comprising: when a camera application of the electronic device is in operation, to obtain photosensitive data forming each frame of an image (Fletcher: see par. [0067], wherein a camera application 48G of the electronic device is in operation to obtain photosensitive data forming each frame of an image as reading RGB data for each pixel of the frame); obtaining the photosensitive data, and determining an ambient light brightness value at where the electronic device is located based on the photosensitive data (Fletcher: see par. [0072], in which obtaining the photosensitive data and determining an ambient light brightness value at where the electronic device is located based on the photosensitive data as grayscale value); obtaining current screen brightness value of the electronic device and the ambient light brightness value through the camera application (Fletcher: see pars. [0067], [0072], [0080], in which obtaining current screen brightness value of the electronic device as backlight intensity and the ambient light brightness value as average grayscale through the camera application 48G); and adjusting a screen backlight brightness corresponding to a camera application interface of the electronic device when the camera application is in operation based on the ambient light brightness value and the current screen brightness value (Fletcher: see fig. 3 and par. [0080], adjusting a screen backlight brightness as step 310 corresponding to a camera application interface of the electronic device when the camera application 48G is in operation based on the ambient light brightness value as greyscale average and the current screen brightness value as the backlight intensity). Fletcher does not explicitly disclose driving an image sensor corresponding to the camera application through a kernel layer of the electronic device, obtaining the photosensitive data through a hardware abstraction layer of the camera application. However, Kim teaches driving an image sensor corresponding to the camera application through a kernel layer of the electronic device, obtaining the photosensitive data through a hardware abstraction layer of the camera application (Kim: see fig. 3 and pars. [0054], [0085], wherein the camera driver 133 corresponding to the camera application 131 through a kernel layer of the electronic device, obtaining the photosensitive data through a hardware abstraction layer 132 of the camera application 131). One would have been modified to include a kernel, a hardware abstraction layer as taught by Kim in the apparatus of Fletcher to provide modularity, device independence and high performance. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Kim with the Fletcher’s system to include driving an image sensor corresponding to the camera application through a kernel layer of the electronic device, obtaining the photosensitive data through a hardware abstraction layer of the camera application. Regarding claim 22, Fletcher in the combination with Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 20. Fletcher further teaches that the photosensitive data comprises first photosensitive data corresponding to a front camera; and the operation of determining the ambient light brightness value at where the electronic device is located based on the photosensitive data comprises: determining the ambient light brightness value at where the electronic device is located based on the first photosensitive data (Fletcher: see par. [0072]). Regarding claim 24, Fletcher in the combination with Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 20, wherein the operation of adjusting the screen backlight brightness corresponding to the camera application interface of the electronic device when the camera application is in operation based on the ambient light brightness value and the current screen brightness value comprises: determining whether the current screen brightness value is greater than a minimum screen brightness value (Fletcher: see par. [0071], at step 306, convert the adjusted greyscale value to a backlight percentage value, the backlight percentage value can be greater than a minimum screen brightness value or not); when the current screen brightness value is not greater than the minimum screen brightness value, adjusting the screen backlight brightness corresponding to the camera application interface of the electronic device when the camera application is in operation to the minimum screen brightness value (Fletcher: see pars. [0071], [0079], wherever the current screen brightness value is greater than the minimum screen brightness value or not, adjust the screen backlight brightness to minimum bright values); and when the current screen brightness value is greater than the minimum screen brightness value, linearly adjusting or non-linearly adjusting the screen backlight brightness corresponding to the camera application interface of the electronic device when the camera application is in operation based on the ambient light brightness value (Fletcher: see pars. [0071], [0079], in which the current screen brightness value is greater than the minimum screen brightness value or not, adjust the screen backlight brightness based on the ambient light brightness value as the greyscale average). Regarding claim 26, Fletcher in the combination with Kim discloses the electronic device of claim 20, wherein before the operation of driving the image sensor corresponding to the camera application through the kernel layer of the electronic device to obtain the photosensitive data forming each frame of the image (see the analysis of claim 20). Fletcher in the combination with Kim does not explicitly disclose that the method further comprises: determining whether the electronic device has a light sensor, whether the light sensor is disabled, and whether the electronic device has enabled an automatic brightness adjustment function; when the electronic device has no light sensor or the light sensor is disabled or the electronic device has not enabled a brightness adjustment function, performing the operation of driving the image sensor corresponding to the camera application through the kernel layer of the electronic device to obtain the photosensitive data forming each frame of the image; and when the electronic device has the light sensor and the electronic device has enabled the brightness adjustment function, the camera application not performing any processing, and adjusting the screen backlight brightness of the electronic device according to the light sensor by the electronic device. The Examiner takes Official Notice that the method further comprises: determining whether the electronic device has a light sensor, whether the light sensor is disabled, and whether the electronic device has enabled an automatic brightness adjustment function; when the electronic device has no light sensor or the light sensor is disabled or the electronic device has not enabled a brightness adjustment function, performing the operation of driving the image sensor corresponding to the camera application through the kernel layer of the electronic device to obtain the photosensitive data forming each frame of the image; and when the electronic device has the light sensor and the electronic device has enabled the brightness adjustment function, the camera application not performing any processing, and adjusting the screen backlight brightness of the electronic device according to the light sensor by the electronic device” is well known in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate that teaching into Fletcher and Kim system to perform adjusting the screen brightness. The rational/ motivation to do so is to obtain plurality of methods to adjust the screen brightness. Regarding claim 11, Fletcher in the combination with Kim discloses the method of claim 3. Fletcher in the combination with Kim does not explicitly disclose comprising: obtaining the first photosensitive data corresponding to the front camera and the second photosensitive data corresponding to the rear camera through a same image sensor. The Examiner takes Official Notice that obtaining the first photosensitive data corresponding to the front camera and the second photosensitive data corresponding to the rear camera through a same image sensor is well known in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate that teaching into Fletcher and Kim’s system to obtain the photosensitive data. The rational/motivation to do so is to measure the ambient light more accurate. Regarding claims 1, 3, 5 and 7, claims 1, 3, 5 and 7 are directed to a method corresponding to the apparatus claimed in claims 20, 22, 24 and 26, respectively. Claims 1, 3, 5 and 7 are similar scope to claims 20, 22, 24 and 26, respectively, and are therefore rejected under similar rationale. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4, 6, 8-9, 21, 23, 25 and 27-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHAN T H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3452. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHAN T NGUYEN/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2638 /LIN YE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747338
IMAGE SENSOR WITH IN-PIXEL BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION AND MOTION DETECTION
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745004
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME GEO REFERENCING STABILIZATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739507
COMBINED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONIC IMAGE STABILIZATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739534
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE CONFIGURED TO REGENERATE TIMESTAMP AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724222
CAMERA MODULE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 500 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month