Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/107,998

SPLICING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SPLICING SHEETS OF MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 28, 2025
Priority
Sep 06, 2022 — EU 22194074.5 +1 more
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Philip Morris International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
304 granted / 467 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
496
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 467 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 16-26 in the reply filed on 08/28/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 27-30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 08/28/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 16-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 16, line 11 recites "a position of the splicing protrusions in the array of splicing protrusions". This scope of position in this context is unclear (e.g. a position of each protrusion or a position of one protrusion or a position of the array as a whole?). Dependent claims fall herewith. Claim 16, line 12 recites "a position of the splicing holes in the array of splicing holes". This scope of position in this context is unclear (e.g. a position of each hole or a position of one hole or a position of the array as a whole?). Dependent claims fall herewith. Claim 17, line 2 recites "both the punch plate and the counter plate comprise an array of splicing protrusions and an array of splicing holes". This is unclear for several reasons. First, it is unclear whether each of the two plates must have both types of arrays or not. Furthermore, it is unclear whether each of these two arrays is the same or different than the two arrays recited in the parent claim. Dependent claims fall herewith. Prior Art of Record Claims 16-26 are indefinite for the reasons given above with a high degree of uncertainty about the scope of the claim and therefore rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b). Therefore, per MPEP 2173.06, where there is a great deal of confusion and uncertainty as to the proper interpretation of the limitations of a claim, it would not be proper to reject such a claim on the basis of prior art. As stated in In re Steele, 305 F.2d 859, 134 USPQ 292 (CCPA 1962), a rejection over prior art should not be based on considerable speculation about the meaning of terms employed in a claim or assumptions that must be made as to the scope of the claims. In view of the above considerations, claims 16-26 have not been rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103, but instead stand rejected under U.S.C. 112(b). Marschke (US Patent 4,219,378), made of record herein, is pertinent to claim 16 and teaches a splicing device comprising a pressing plate and a counter plate arranged movable opposite to each other for splicing webs (Figs. 1, 6, 8). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached on 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIMMY R SMITH JR./Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746567
STAGE AND CURING DEVICE HAVING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747366
PRETREAT COMPOSITIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741418
High Speed Light Valve System
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12709091
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE AND WINDOW
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703150
OPTICAL UNIT AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL WORKPIECE
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.7%)
2y 10m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 467 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month