Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/108,189

PARABOLOID LENS AND EYEWEAR COMPRISING SUCH A LENS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 03, 2025
Priority
Sep 15, 2022 — IT 102022000018903 +2 more
Examiner
HASAN, MOHAMMED A
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Luxottica S.r.l.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1619 granted / 1792 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1792 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a) — (d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Oath/Declaration Oath/Declaration 2. Oath and declaration filed on 3/17/2025 is accepted. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The prior art documents submitted by application in the Information Disclosure Statement filed on 3/3/2025 have all been considered and made of record ( note the attached copy of form PTO – 1449). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Tabacchi (2007/0296913 A1). Regarding claim 1, Tabacchi discloses (refer to figures 1-2) a lens for spectacles and/or masks, comprising: an inner surface (2) (figures 1 and 7) said second inner central curve and said second outer central curve are defined by the intersection of the inner surface and outer surface respectively with a second plane (Y_0) passing through the geometric center of the lens ; second plane (Y_0) being tilted with respect to a horizontal direction by an angle between -25° and 25° (figures 1,4,5,7,9) said inner surface (curvatures S1 and S3) convex at least along said first inner central curve and concave at least along said second inner central curve toward the wearer's eye and said outer surface (S2,S4) is convex at least along said first outer central curve and concave at least along said second outer central curve toward the wearer's eye. Regarding claim 11, Tabacchi discloses wherein the outer surface(3) is cylindrical . Regarding claim 12, Tabacchi discloses wherein said second plane (Y_0) extends in a substantially horizontal direction (figures 1,3,7). Regarding claim 13, Tabacchi discloses wherein said first plane (X_0) is tilted with respect to a vertical plane by a second angle between -30° and +30degree (paragraph 0023). Regarding claim 14, Tabacchi discloses (refer to figures 1-2) eyewear comprising; at least one lens for spectacles and/or masks, said lens having an inner surface (figures 1-2 , surface 2) Regarding claim 15, Tabacchi discloses (refer to figures 1-2) eyewear comprising. at least one lens for spectacles and/or masks, said lens having an inner surface (figures 1-2 , surface 2) configured to be directed toward at least an eye of a wearer and an outer surface opposite to the inner surface inner surface and outer surface being spaced from each other defining a thickness (S) on said inner surface lens . Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claim 2 and 3-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: wherein: said inner surface has, at least along said first inner central curve , a radius of curvature (R30) that varies continuously and in an increasing and/or decreasing manner; and said inner has, at least along said second inner central curve , a radius of curvature that varies continuously and in an increasing and/or decreasing manner and wherein said radius of curvature of said inner surface along said first inner central curve is at least partly increasing and at least partly decreasing said radius of curvature of said inner surface along said second inner central curve being at least partly increasing and at least partly decreasing wherein said outer surface has, at least along said first outer curve constant radius of curvature and wherein said outer surface has, at least along said second outer central curve , a constant radius of curvature and wherein thickness varies continuously. Conclusion 7.Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED A HASAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2331. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6 AM -4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at 571-272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED A HASAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 9/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769032
RELAY REDIRECTOR, DISPLAY DEVICE AND NEAR-EYE DISPLAY SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769116
EYEBALL INFORMATION DETECTION APPARATUS, DISPLAY APPARATUS, EYEBALL INFORMATION DETECTION METHOD, AND DISPLAY METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769082
LENS MODULE
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761405
OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761475
DISPLAY DEVICE FOR VEHICLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.1%)
1y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1792 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month