Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/108,338

OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE WITH APERTURE IRIS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 03, 2025
Priority
May 30, 2023 — provisional 63/469,577 +1 more
Examiner
GREECE, JAMES R
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lumus Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
851 granted / 981 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 10, and 12-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1,a2) as being anticipated by KR 20200001026 U. Re claim 1, KR 20200001026 U teaches an optical waveguide comprising: a pair of major surfaces that are parallel (see numeral 45 with parallel surfaces); an aperture configured to receive an input beam, the aperture having a first dimension (see numeral 20 which serves as an aperture); a coupling-in element configured to receive the input beam from the aperture and couple the input beam into the optical waveguide (see prism 730);a first set of facets disposed between the major surfaces along a first axis and configured to receive the input beam from the coupling-in element and at least partially reflect the input beam (see numeral 40); and an iris matched to the aperture and configured to block rays outside of the aperture from entering the optical waveguide, wherein the first dimension of the aperture corresponds to a pitch of the first set of facets (see figure 2 first section serves as iris). Re claim 2, KR 20200001026 U teaches wherein the aperture has a second dimension that corresponds to aspects of the optical waveguide corresponding to a second axis (see numeral 20). Re claim 10, KR 20200001026 U teaches wherein the second dimension of the aperture is smaller than the first dimension of the aperture (see numeral 20). Re claim 12, KR 20200001026 U teaches wherein the aperture and iris are disposed on one of the major surfaces (see figure 2). Re claim 13, KR 20200001026 U teaches wherein the iris comprises an opening that is aligned with the aperture (see figure 2). Re claim 14, KR 20200001026 U teaches wherein the coupling-in element comprises a mirror or a prism (see numeral 730). Re claim 15, KR 20200001026 U teaches a projector configured to produce an input beam; and the optical waveguide of claim 1 (technical field display device projects light). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-9, 11, and 16-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art taken singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the independent claims, in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper. In regard to independent claim 3, the prior art taken either singly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the optical waveguide further comprises a second set of facets disposed between the major surfaces along the second axis; the first set of facets is configured to at least partially reflect the input beam towards the second set of facets; and the second set of facets is configured to at least partially reflect beams from the first set of facets out of the optical waveguide; recited together in combination with the totality of particular features/limitations recited therein In regard to independent claim 11, the prior art taken either singly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the pitch of the first set of facets corresponds to a distance between adjacent facets of the first set of facets along the first axis; recited together in combination with the totality of particular features/limitations recited therein Cited Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20100149073 A1 WO 2023209710 A1 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES R GREECE whose telephone number is (571)272-3711. The examiner can normally be reached 8-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allana Bidder can be reached at 571-272-5560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES R GREECE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761462
OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY WITH WIDE FIELD OF VIEW
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761512
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12733347
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727247
DRIVE SUBSTRATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND LIGHT-EMITTING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707720
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month