Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/108,861

ACCELERATION OF MRI EXAMINATIONS OF THE LIVER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Sep 07, 2022 — EU 22194395.4 +1 more
Examiner
ATALA, JAMIE JO
Art Unit
2486
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
UNIVERSITÄTSKLINIKUM ESSEN
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
114 granted / 233 resolved
-9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
3 currently pending
Career history
244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§103
65.7%
+25.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 233 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 TThe following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 1-23, is being rejected as as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or joint inventor regards as the invention. Specifically, claim 1 recites inconsistent and unclear MRI image identifiers, including “MRI1,” “MRI2,” “MRI2*,” “MRIP0,” “MRIP1,” and “MRIP2*,” such that it is unclear which MRI image corresponds to the training input image, the training target image, the predicted training image, the patient input image, and the predicted patient output image. For example, the claim recites that the trained machine learning model generates “a predicted second MRI image (MRI2*)” based on “at least one first MRI image (MRI1)”, while later reciting that the target data comprise “a second MRI image (MRI2)”, and still later reciting a patient-side predicted image as “a predicted MRI image (MRIP2*)”. The claim therefore does not clearly define whether MRI2* and MRIP2* refer to the same type of predicted hepatobiliary-phase image, different predicted images, or different stages of the same image-generation process. Further, claim 1 recites “MRI images (MRIO, MRI1)”, but elsewhere recites the native MRI image as “MRI0” with a zero, creating ambiguity as to whether “MRIO” is intended to be “MRI0” or a different image identifier. If Applicant intends to use MRIP0, MRIP1, and MRIP2* for patient images and MRI0, MRI1, MRI2, and MRI2* for training images, the claim should be amended to consistently define and use those identifiers. Additionally, to the extent the claim or related claim text uses “MRIP02” or “MRIPO2,” that identifier lacks antecedent basis and is unclear because claim 1 introduces MRIP0 as the optional native patient MRI image and MRIP2* as the predicted patient MRI image but does not clearly \ introduce MRIP02/MRIPO2 as a defined image. Due to the inconsistent MRI image labels obscure which images are inputs, targets, and/or predicted outputs makes claim inconsistent; however, if these claim limitations were cleaned up with regard to this rejection the claims do overcome all prior art and would be in condition for allowance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMIE JO ATALA whose telephone number is (571)272-7384. The examiner can normally be reached 830am-500pm M-TH. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact Dave Czkeaj 571-272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMIE J ATALA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2486
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772211
TRANSMISSION PARAMETER MODIFICATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762666
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764270
Depth Scanning Image Sensor
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12671780
INSPECTION DEVICE AND INSPECTION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659889
CONTROL METHOD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MODULE FOR PPDU END TIME ALIGNMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+34.5%)
4y 6m (~2y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 233 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month