Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/108,907

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRINTING A SUBSTRATE WITH A SEALANT AND/OR ADHESIVE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Examiner
FERGUSON SAMRETH, MARISSA LIANA
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
537 granted / 773 resolved
+1.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 8-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Akata (JP 2001127405). With respect to claim 1, Akata teaches a device for printing a substrate (82) with a sealant and/or adhesive (90), the device comprising: a stencil (10) with an upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) and a lower side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) and at least one recess (81) extending from the upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) to the lower side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) for receiving the sealant and/or adhesive (90, Paragraph 0013, 0017-0019), wherein at least one channel (12, 13) connected to the recess (81) is integrated into the stencil (10). [AltContent: textbox (Lower side)][AltContent: textbox (Upper Side)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 322 426 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Akata teaches the at least one channel (12, 13) extends from the upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) to the lower side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) of the stencil (10) and the channel (12, 13) extends in regions, of the at least one recess (81, Figures 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9). With respect to claim 3, Akata teaches the at least one channel (12, 13) extends from the upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) of the stencil (10) to a limiting wall (81A) of the at least one recess (81) and at least partially has an oblique or angular profile. With respect to claim 4, Akata teaches the at least one channel (12, 13) is embodied at least in sections as a bore (11, 11A, 11B) formed in the stencil (10). With respect to claim 8, Akata teaches the device comprises a doctor blade (93) for removing the sealant and/or adhesive (90) on the upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) of the stencil (10, Figures 3, 5, 6). With respect to claim 9, Akata teaches a method for printing a substrate (82) with a sealant and/or adhesive (90) using a device according to claim 1, the method comprising: placing the stencil (10) on the substrate (82) so that the lower side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action) of the stencil (10) is in surface contact with the substrate (82, Paragraph 013), applying the sealant and/or adhesive (90) on the upper side (3.1) of the stencil (82, Paragraphs 0005, 0006, 0013, 0017-0019, 0021), filling the at least one recess (81) of the stencil (82) with the sealant and/or adhesive (90) with the aid of a doctor blade (93) which is drawn towards the at least one channel (12, 13, Paragraphs 0013, 0017, 0018, 0024) above the upper side (refer to marked-up Figure 3 in the detailed action, Figures 3, 5, 6) of the stencil (82), wherein air present in the at least one recess (12, 13) is forced out of the at least one recess (81) via the at least one channel (12, 13, Paragraphs 0018, 0021, 0022, 0024). With respect to claim 10, Akata teaches wherein when filling the at least one recess (81) of the stencil (82) with the sealant and/or adhesive (90), a region of the at least one recess (81) or the at least one channel (12, 13) directly adjacent to the at least one channel (12, 13) itself is the last to be filled (Figures 3, 5, 6, 8, 9). With respect to claim 11, Akata teaches the at least one channel (12, 13) extends in and end and/or corner region (6) of the recess (81, Figures 8, 9). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7 and 12-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. With respect to the claim 5, the prior art does not teach or render obvious at least one shoulder reaching up to the at least one recess is introduced, at the lower side of the stencil, from which the at least one channel, is guided up to the upper side of the stencil. With respect to claim 6, the prior art does not teach or render obvious at least one further shoulder reaching up to the at least one recess, is introduced, in at the lower side of the stencil, wherein in a region of the further shoulder a platelet is inserted, into the stencil which together with the at least one first shoulder limits the at least one channel at least in sections. With respect to claim 12, the prior art does not teach or render obvious at least one shoulder reaching up to the at least one recess is milled in the lower side of the stencil. Conclusion Nakamura et al. (JP2010251581) teaches a device for printing a substrate. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARISSA LIANA FERGUSON SAMRETH whose telephone number is (571)272-2163. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at 571-272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Marissa Ferguson-Samreth/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594756
SYSTEM FOR RECOVERING A CLEANING SOLUTION AND PRINTING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583249
ROLLER FOR HOT STAMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577080
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576654
FOOD PRODUCT SCALE AND ASSOCIATED LABEL STOCK JUSTIFICATION ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558916
METAL DECORATION MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month