Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/108,977

DISPLAY DEVICE CONTROLLED BY REMOTE CONTROLLER AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Priority
Sep 28, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0123254 +1 more
Examiner
HONG, MICHAEL HYUN
Art Unit
2426
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
443 granted / 597 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 597 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-6, 10-15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding the limitation of claim 4 “transmitting a changed custom code to an external device of a group having the same custom code as a custom code of the display device” (similar claim limitation in claim 10), it is ambiguous and unclear as to whether the claim is mentioning whether a group has the same custom code as the display device, or whether an external device (in the group) has the same custom code as the display device. Correction and clarification is required. Response to Arguments Regarding applicant’s argument that the amendment to claims 4 and 10 (removing “specific”) from the claims resolves the 112(b) issue, examiner respectfully disagrees. The removal of the word “specific” does not clarify whether the external device has the same custom code as the display device or whether the group has the same custom code as the display device. “Transmitted to an external device of a group having the same custom code as a custom code of the display device” can be interpreted to mean that the external device has the same code or the group has the same custom code. Further clarification is required. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL HYUN HONG whose telephone number is (571)270-1553. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nasser Goodarzi can be reached at (571)272-4195. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL H HONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2426
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12688370
PROMPT BASED BACKGROUND REPLACEMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684192
AUTOMATED GENERATION OF CONTENT-RELATED DISCUSSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677041
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY SYNCING FROM TIME-SHIFTED FRAME TO LIVE STREAM OF CONTENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670559
IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSOR AND IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671852
System and Method to Identify Programs and Commercials in Video Content via Unsupervised Static Content Identification
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.8%)
3y 2m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 597 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month