Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/109,537

Systems and Methods for Wirelessly Powered Sources with Programmable Amplitude and Spectrum Spreading Using Pulse Width Modulation

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Priority
Sep 07, 2022 — provisional 63/374,843 +2 more
Examiner
EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Regents of the University of California
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
458 granted / 539 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 539 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-22 are objected to because of the following informalities: The numbers of the elements in the drawings should be removed from the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mishra et al. (Pub. No.: US 2019/0001139 A1); hereinafter referred to as “Mishra”, in view of Bojeva et al. (Pub. No.: US 2007/0067004 A1); hereinafter referred to as “Bojeva”. Regarding claim 1, Mishra discloses an implantable pulse generator (e.g. see figure 1 element 250, [0250]) comprising: an Rx antenna (e.g. see figure 1 elements 230, 240) configured to receive a radio frequency (RF) signal (e.g. see [0229], [0246], [0259], [0280]); a rectifier (e.g. see figure 1 element 232, [0259]) coupled to the Rx antenna and configured to rectify the RF signal to generate an output voltage; an energy storage capacitor (e.g. see figure 1 element 270, [0243]) coupled to the rectifier and configured to be charged by the output voltage; and a demodulator (e.g. see figure 1 element 231, [0258]) coupled to the Rx antenna, the rectifier, and a source (e.g. see [0246], [0259]. The examiner understands the “source” to be the power signal (RF signal) from external device 500). Mishra discloses the demodulator (e.g. see figure 1 element 231, [0258]) and delivering pulse trains (e.g. see [0368]) but is silent as to the demodulator configured to control an output of a train of mini-pulses based on the RF signal, each mini-pulse having a voltage amplitude and a pulse width (on-portion) smaller than a pulse width. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0294], figure 30 element 416 (for the demodulator that receives the RF signal) and [0286], figure 26A (for the mini-pulses) to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the demodulator function as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Mishra discloses delivering pulse trains (e.g. see [0368]) but is silent as to stimulation circuitry coupled to receive the train of mini-pulses and deliver the train of mini-pulse to an electrode, the stimulation circuitry configured such that delivery of the train of mini-pulses to the electrode effectively corresponds to a stimulation pulse having the pulse width and an amplitude that is a function of the pulse widths of the mini-pulses included in the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0298], [0286] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 2, Mishra discloses the invention but is silent as to the RF signal is amplitude modulated to include a plurality of notches, and the demodulator is configured to detect the plurality of notches and, for each notch, to enable the output of a mini-pulse in the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0298] (“The physician or medical technician programs programming unit 450 via keyboard 432. This program regarding the frequency, pulse width, modulation program, ON time etc. is stored in programming circuit 438. The programming unit 450 must be placed relatively close to the implanted stimulator 490 in order to transfer the commands and programming information from antenna 440 to antenna 418. Upon receipt of this programming data, modulator/demodulator and decoder 416 decodes and conditions these signals, and the digital programming information is captured by memory 414”) (Thus, the notches are the periods the On time is not On, which is translated/decoded by the demodulator) to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 3, Mishra discloses the demodulator (e.g. see figure 1 element 231, [0258]) but is silent as to the demodulator is configured to control a release of energy stored in an energy storage capacitor to output the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0298], [0286] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 4, Mishra discloses the demodulator (e.g. see figure 1 element 231, [0258]) but is silent as to the demodulator is configured to control the coupling of the output voltage to output the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0295]-[0296] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claims 5 and 6, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the stimulation circuitry comprises a low pass filter and the low pass filter comprises a resistor and a capacitor that are added. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0295], figure 30 element 406 to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 7, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the stimulation circuitry comprises a DC-block capacitor coupled to the output of the low pass filter, wherein the DC-block capacitor prevents release of DC charge. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0381] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claims 8-10, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to each mini-pulse comprises an on portion and an off portion, the on portion corresponding to the pulse width of the mini-pulse; and the pulse width of the stimulation pulse is greater than a summation of the on portions of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses, each mini-pulse comprises an on portion and an off portion, the on portion corresponding to the pulse width of the mini-pulse; and the pulse width of the stimulation pulse is substantially equal to a summation of the on portion and the off portion of each mini-pulse in the train of mini-pulses, and each mini-pulse comprises an on portion and an off portion, the on portion corresponding to the pulse width of the mini-pulse; and the amplitude of the stimulation pulse is proportional to a summation of the pulse widths of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0298], [0286] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 11, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the voltage amplitudes of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses are constant. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0381] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 12, Mishra discloses the pulse widths of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses are constant (e.g. see [0368]). Regarding claim 13, Mishra discloses the pulse widths of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses vary (e.g. see [0368]). Regarding claims 14 and 15, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the pulse widths of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses alternate between a first pulse width and a second pulse width and a first subset of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses have a first pulse width and a second subset of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses have a second pulse width different from the first pulse width. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0303]-[0306], [0319]-[0321] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 16, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the train of mini-pulses is configurable to provide different spectrums in the frequency domain, wherein a spectrum of a train of mini-pulses in the frequency domain changes based on a configuration of the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0304]-[0307], [0319]-[0322] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 17, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the train of mini-pulses is configurable to provide different spectrums in the frequency domain, wherein a spectrum of a train of mini-pulses in the frequency domain changes based on a configuration of the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0286], [0292] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 18, Mishra discloses the stimulation circuitry is coupled to receive different trains of mini-pulses in the frequency domain and generate a same stimulation pulse having the pulse width and an amplitude that is a function of the pulse widths of the mini-pulses included in the different trains of mini-pulses (e.g. see [0365], [0358]). Regarding claim 19, see the rejection for claims 1 and 2 above. Regarding claim 20, Mishra discloses the invention (see rejection for claim 1) an implantable pulse generator having at least one electrode; and an external apparatus comprising a transmitter configured to generate and transmit the RF signal received by the implantable pulse generator as recited in claim 1. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0328] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 21, Mishra discloses the circuitry (see rejection for claim 1) but is silent as to the transmitter is configured to be programmed to control the configuration of the RF signal to thereby control the amplitude of the stimulation pulse. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0286] to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Regarding claim 22, Mishra discloses the invention but is silent as to the amplitude of the stimulation pulse is controlled by a number and duration of the notches in the RF signal, which duration controls the pulse widths of the mini-pulses in the train of mini-pulses. Bojeva teaches it is known to use such a modification as set forth in [0298] (“The physician or medical technician programs programming unit 450 via keyboard 432. This program regarding the frequency, pulse width, modulation program, ON time etc. is stored in programming circuit 438. The programming unit 450 must be placed relatively close to the implanted stimulator 490 in order to transfer the commands and programming information from antenna 440 to antenna 418. Upon receipt of this programming data, modulator/demodulator and decoder 416 decodes and conditions these signals, and the digital programming information is captured by memory 414”) (Thus, the notches are the periods the On time is not On, which is translated/decoded by the demodulator) to provide pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g. see [0294]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the stimulation circuitry configuration as taught by Bojeva in the system/method of Mishra, since said modification would provide the predictable results of pulses and pulse trains that give physicians a lot of flexibility for trying various different neuromodulation algorithms for providing and optimizing therapy for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP C EDWARDS whose telephone number is (571)270-1804. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Unsu Jung can be reached at 571-272-8506. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /P.C.E/Examiner, Art Unit 3792 /AMANDA L STEINBERG/Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752110
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746394
ATRIAL TRACKING CONFIRMATION IN AN INTRACARDIAC VENTRICULAR PACEMAKER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12691282
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRAINING AND ASSISTING GAIT OF A PERSON
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12678616
FLEXIBLE ELECTRODE FOR BRAIN AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12661060
Detection and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 539 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month