Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/109,696

CONDUCTIVE FILM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 07, 2025
Priority
Sep 22, 2022 — JP 2022-151358 +1 more
Examiner
KHATRI, PRASHANT J
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 887 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 887 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nonami et al. (WO 2021/131319). US 20220397970 is the PG-Pub of the National Stage Application that is translated as-is into English. See MPEP 1893.01(d). Nonami discloses a touch sensor. Concerning claim 1, Nonami discloses the touch sensor (FIG. 8) comprises a substrate with a first and second grooves that extend linearly and have bottomed shapes with the conductive lines embedded in the grooves wherein the widths of one of the grooves and recesses are larger than the other groove and the depth for each groove is from 0.5 to 3 microns (para. 0035-0043 and 0082-0099; FIGS. 1, 3, 8 and 11-17). With respect to the depth of the groove having a larger width being greater than a groove having a width less than the larger width, if the radius of curvature of the bottom and side surfaces for each groove are the same, the resulting depth would have the relationship as claimed. Regarding claims 2 and 3, Nonami discloses the depth for each groove is from 0.5 to 3 microns and each groove can be for example from 1.8 to 4.2 microns (para. 0039-0040 and 0042). While it is noted that Nonami does not explicitly recite the claimed groove width of 8 to 12 microns and recess depth of 0.004 to 7 microns, Examiner notes that the widths are exemplary and as such, Nonami is open to other widths. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have any width and recess depth, including the claimed width for the desired electrical connections. Regarding claim 4, given the above, the value would at least overlap and include the claimed value. With respect to claim 8, a blackened layer is disposed on the grooves (e.g. FIGS. 11 and 12, element 38). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7 and 9-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art is silent to the claimed structure in combination with the independent claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PRASHANT J KHATRI whose telephone number is (571)270-3470. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at (571) 272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PRASHANT J. KHATRI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1783 /PRASHANT J KHATRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763402
FLAME-RETARDANT, THERMAL-INSULATING, AND FIREPROOF MATERIAL FOR BATTERIES
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763230
Transparent Conductive Oxide Having an Embedded Film
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765253
POLYESTER FILM AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12746742
CO-EXTRUDED SHEET
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734792
FULL POLYETHYLENE BLOWN FILM THROUGH DOUBLE BUBBLE PROCESS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 5m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 887 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month