Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/110,244

TOOL STORAGE DEVICE AND TOOL REVERSING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 10, 2025
Priority
Oct 14, 2022 — JP 2022-165816 +2 more
Examiner
SALONE, BAYAN
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Amada Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
626 granted / 822 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 6-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on September 06, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites “…the second stocker moves so as to retract to a non-movable area of an arm part of the tool changing robot, when the tool changing robot performs tool change in the first stocker”. This is a method step of using an apparatus. Because the preamble of the claim is directed towards an apparatus and not a method of using the apparatus, it is not clear as to whether Applicant intends the limitations to be required, such that the claim is directed towards a method and not simply the apparatus, or whether Applicant intends the limitations to be functional language, such that the claimed apparatus merely has to be capable of performing the given steps. Also, the aforementioned method step does not further limit the claim as said step does not recite/claim any structural features of the claimed apparatus. Claim 5 recites “…the second stocker moves to a position not overlapping the first stocker in the second direction with reference to a fixed position of the first stocker”. This is a method step of using an apparatus. Because the preamble of the claim is directed towards an apparatus and not a method of using the apparatus, it is not clear as to whether Applicant intends the limitations to be required, such that the claim is directed towards a method and not simply the apparatus, or whether Applicant intends the limitations to be functional language, such that the claimed apparatus merely has to be capable of performing the given steps. Also, the aforementioned method step does not further limit the claim as said step does not recite/claim any structural features of the claimed apparatus. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dallan (WO 2017212386). Re Claim 1, Dallan discloses a tool storage device MC, comprising: a first stocker 32 on which a plurality of tools U used for bending processing are mountable in a first direction; and at least one second stocker 32 on which the plurality of tools U are mountable in the first direction, the at least one second stocker 32 being arranged side by side with the first stocker 32 in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, the second stocker 32 is configured to be movable in a third direction orthogonal to each of the first direction and the second direction (Pg. 1, Lines 1-4, Pg. 7, Line 28-Pg. 8, Line 9, Pg. 8, Lines 16-18 and Pg. 9, Lines 4-14, Figs. 1-4). Re Claim 2, Dallan discloses the first stocker 32 and the second stocker 32 each include a plurality of stages in the third direction (See figure 7). Re Claim 3, Dallan discloses the first stocker 32 and the second stocker 32 are provided in order of the first stocker 32 configured in a fixed state and the second stocker 32 configured to be movable, from a side far from a tool changing robot 60, 62 the tool changing robot 60, 62 being arranged on one side of the tool storage device MC in the second direction (Page 9, Lines 4-14, Figs.1-4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sartorio (US 5857377) discloses a tool storage device, comprising: a first stocker 406 on which a plurality of tools used for bending processing are mountable in a first direction (Col. 13, Lines 43-48, Fig. 31). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAYAN SALONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7739. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-60 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil Singh can be reached at (571)272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAYAN SALONE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747713
MULTI-PART PISTON CONSTRUCTION FOR AN OPPOSED-PISTON ENGINE
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746021
EXTRACTOR CANNULA SECUREMENT AND PROCESSING
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746607
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FORMING OIL MIST IN MACHINING APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734629
TOOL CHANGING DEVICE FOR A MACHINE TOOL AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734625
SELF-POWERED SENSING TOOL HOLDER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month