Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/110,343

GEAR-SHIFTING DEVICE FOR MOBILITY VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 10, 2025
Examiner
ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
VALEO EMBRAYAGES
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
580 granted / 761 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
810
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Karrenberg [DE 102017008376]. Regarding claim 1: Karrenberg shows a gearshift device (see fig 1) for a mobility device, comprising a selection shaft (15) in which there are arranged a shuttle (24), a worm screw (23) and a guide tube (25) in which the worm screw (23) is positioned. Regarding claim 2: Karrenberg shows wherein one of a plurality of ends (the two ends of the guide tube 25) of the guide tube (25) is inserted in a rotation-blocking element (22) so that the shuttle (24) can be prevented from rotating. Regarding claim 3: Karrenberg shows wherein the guide tube (25) is formed by two blades (30a, 30a) arranged longitudinally with respect to the worm screw (23) and one on each side thereof. Regarding claim 4: Karrenberg shows wherein the two blades (30a, 30a) are arranged about the worm screw (23) at between 45 degrees and 180 degrees along a length thereof (see fig 4). Regarding claim 5: Karrenberg shows wherein the length of the guide tube (25) is determined such that the worm screw (23) is fully inserted therein (see fig 2). Regarding claim 6: Karrenberg shows wherein the length of the guide tube (25) is identical to that of the worm screw (23, see fig 2). Regarding claim 9: Karrenberg shows wherein a second end of the guide tube is formed by a second ring (15) inserted into an opening (see fig 4) formed in a rotation-blocking element (30). Regarding claim 10: Karrenberg shows an electrically assisted mobility machine, having the gearshift device (see abstract) as claimed in claim 1 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Karrenberg [DE 102017008376] in view of Yamamoto [CN 107264714]. Regarding claims 7 and 8: Karrenberg does not explicitly show wherein a first end of the guide tube (84) is in the form of a ring (736) ending in a slot-shaped cutout (837), wherein the slot- shaped cutout collaborates with those of at least one anti-rotation washer fixed to the selection shaft. However Yamamoto shows wherein a first end of the guide tube (84) is in the form of a ring (736) ending in a slot-shaped cutout (837), wherein the slot- shaped cutout (837) collaborates with those of at least one anti-rotation washer fixed to the selection shaft (see fig 3). It would have been obvious to someone having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filling date to have made the guide tube having a first end and second end in form of engaging ring with the slots to securely engage and connect the input to the output and prevent any slippage during shifting. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZAKARIA ELAHMADI whose telephone number is (571)270-5324. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 10-6 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached on 571-270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAKARIA ELAHMADI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600191
An Off-road Vehicle and Suspension for Such Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602064
ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577087
OPERATOR CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578007
LINEAR DRIVE APPARATUS FOR CONVERTING A ROTATIONAL MOVEMENT INTO A LINEAR MOVEMENT AND MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560227
BALL SCREW DRIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month