Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 19/110,959

INSTALLATION WITH SEALING DEVICE FOR A LAMP

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Sep 12, 2022 — FR 2209094 +1 more
Examiner
DUNAY, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Claranor
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
561 granted / 738 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
772
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
82.0%
+42.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 738 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Arguments filed 3/4/2026 are persuasive. The Restriction is withdrawn. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Preliminary Amendment The preliminary amendment filed 3/12/2025 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/12/2025 was filed and is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 11, line 3, the applicant recites the limitation of “the cooling circuit.” This limitation lacks proper antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 12-20 are further rejected for depending on claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art taken as a whole does not show nor suggest an installation, comprising a lamp, a circuit for cooling said lamp, at least one electrical connection area of the lamp and at least one sealing device for sealing between said at least one electrical connection area of the lamp, external to said lamp, and the cooling circuit of said lamp, the lamp comprising a tube adapted to enclose a heat source and at least one electrode, adapted to generate said heat source, said at least one electrode being positioned at one end of the tube and connected to said connection area, said cooling circuit comprising a cooling chamber which surrounds said tube of the lamp and wherein a cooling fluid circulates with a cooling fluid pressure, said installation being wherein said at least one sealing device comprises an overpressure chamber positioned between said cooling chamber and said at least one electrical connection area, said at least one sealing device further comprising two seals which are spaced apart from each other by being positioned on either side of said overpressure chamber, at least one of said two seals defining a first sealing wall between the cooling chamber and the overpressure chamber, and the other seal defining a second sealing wall between the overpressure chamber and said at least one electrical connection area, said overpressure chamber comprising a pressurized overpressure fluid, the pressure of the overpressure fluid being higher than said pressure of the cooling fluid present in the cooling chamber as specifically called for the claimed combinations. The closest prior art, Li (CN 1888525 A), does not include said installation being wherein said at least one sealing device comprises an overpressure chamber positioned between said cooling chamber and said at least one electrical connection area, said at least one sealing device further comprising two seals which are spaced apart from each other by being positioned on either side of said overpressure chamber, at least one of said two seals defining a first sealing wall between the cooling chamber and the overpressure chamber, and the other seal defining a second sealing wall between the overpressure chamber and said at least one electrical connection area, said overpressure chamber comprising a pressurized overpressure fluid, the pressure of the overpressure fluid being higher than said pressure of the cooling fluid present in the cooling chamber as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant’s own disclosure, to modify the Li reference in the manner required by the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Peschl (US 2025/0161508 A1) disclose a radiation source. Lys et al (US 2021/0278072 A1) disclose a fluid cooled LED lamp. Edwards (US 2021/0229001 A1) disclose a coolant chamber. Nichols (US 2021/0140618 A1) disclose a cooled light. Schwarz (US 2019/0387636 A1) disclose a cooled electronic device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY whose telephone number is (571)270-1222. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James (Jong-Suk) Lee can be reached at 571-272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER E DUNAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
May 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669227
LAMP INSTALLED BY QUICK PLUGGING AND IMPLEMENTATION METHOD THEREOF
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664459
QUANTUM WRAPPER NETWORKING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663140
CORNER DEFLECTION ELEMENT FOR AN LED LIGHTING STRIP
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655971
Light Emitting Fan Device
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12638156
LIGHTING FIXTURE WITH AN XY BEAM MANIPULATING SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 738 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month