Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/111,020

LIQUID CRYSTAL COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Examiner
VISCONTI, GERALDINA
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rolic Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1146 granted / 1325 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1361
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1325 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected as being vague and indefinite when it recites “SP1 and SP2 each independently from each other represents a group of the formula -(CH2)p- in which p is an integer of 1 to 18 and in which one, two, three or four, -CH2- groups are unreplaced or replaced by groups selected from the group consisting of -CH=CH-, -O-, -S-, -NR'-,-CO-, -COO-, -OOC-, -CONR'-, -OCOO- and -OCONR', with the proviso that firstly the spacer group does not contain two adjacent heteroatoms, and secondly when Xi, X2, X3 and X4 is a single bond, p can also have a value of 0” (emphasis added); the scope of the protection sought is not clear. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 1 recites the broad recitation “p is an integer of 1 to 18”, and the claim also recites “p can also have a value of 0” which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Claim 1 fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the substituents SP1 and SP2 in the compound of formula (I). Claim 1 is rejected as being vague and indefinite when it recites “SP1 and SP2 each independently from each other represents a group of the formula -(CH2)p- in which p is an integer of 1 to 18 and in which one, two, three or four, -CH2- groups are unreplaced or replaced by groups selected from the group consisting of” (emphasis added); the scope of the protection sought is not clear. Claim 1 fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the substituents SP1 and SP2 in the compound of formula (I), i.e., the minimum number of -CH2- groups required and the minimum number of -CH2- groups required to be replaced by one of the recited groups. Claim 8 is rejected as being vague and indefinite when it recites a “method comprising using a compound” “in the manufacture of an optical or an electro-optical device”. A claim is indefinite where it merely recites a use without any active, positive steps delimiting how this use is actually practiced. Claim 8 fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the steps in the claimed method. Claim 11 is rejected as being vague and indefinite when it recites ”a method comprising using a mixture” “in the manufacture of an optical or an electro-optical device”. A claim is indefinite where it merely recites a use without any active, positive steps delimiting how this use is actually practiced. Claim 11 fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the steps in the claimed method. Claim Objections Claims 6 and 7 are objected to because of the following informalities: claims 6 and 7, while respectively drawn to a “LCP mixture” (emphasis added) and a “LCP network” (emphasis added), contain no further limitations regarding the preamble, and as such are essentially the same. Appropriate correction is required. Prior Art The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure of a polymerizable compound characterized by comprising a core represented by PNG media_image1.png 120 447 media_image1.png Greyscale : WIPO Patent No. WO 2024/200529 A1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Assuming arguendo that claim 1 is satisfactorily amended to overcome the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action, then claims 2-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Geraldina Visconti whose telephone number is (571)272-1334. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark F Huff can be reached at 571-272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GERALDINA VISCONTI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1737 /GERALDINA VISCONTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595416
LC MIXTURES WITH NEGATIVE DELTA EPSILONCONTAINING CC-4-V1 AND COB(S)-N-OM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570900
POLYMERISABLE COMPOUND, POLYMERISABLE LC MATERIAL AND POLYMER FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565617
POLYMERISABLE OLIGOMERIC LIQUID CRYSTAL, POLYMERISABLE MEDIUM AND POLYMERISED LIQUID CRYSTAL FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559679
OPTICALLY ANISOTROPIC LAYER, OPTICAL FILM, POLARIZING PLATE, AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559678
Liquid-crystal medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+1.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1325 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month