Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/111,120

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERTICAL TAKEOFF AND LANDING VEHICLE WITH IMPROVED ROTOR SIZING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Sep 15, 2022 — provisional 63/406,872 +1 more
Examiner
O'HARA, BRIAN M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Maglev Aero Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
452 granted / 601 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
617
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 05/19/2026. The arguments are not persuasive because the other invention requires more searching outside of the current search. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bastian (US 7825554 B2). Bastian discloses: 1. (Original) A vehicle (300), comprising: a body (302) having an opening and an axis (through middle of Fig. 10) through the opening; a stator (12) within the opening of the body; a first rotor (14) magnetically coupled to the stator at a first position and configured to rotate about an axis, the first rotor comprising a plurality of first blades having a first length; and a second rotor (16) magnetically coupled to the stator at a second position spaced from the first position, the second rotor comprising a plurality of second blades having a second length, the second rotor configured to rotate about the axis, the second length less than the first length. 2. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of first blades and the plurality of second blades respectively have centers of pressure (inherent) at or in front of respective centers of rotation about the axis. 3. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein: respective inner ends of the plurality of first blades are outward from a point at least one third of a distance from the axis to respective outer edges of the plurality of first blades; and respective inner ends of the plurality of second blades are outward from a point at least one third of a distance from the axis to respective outer edges of the plurality of second blades (compare lengths in Figs. 12 and 13). 4. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein: respective inner ends of the plurality of first blades are positioned along a first plane that is perpendicular to the axis; respective inner ends of the plurality of second blades are positioned along a second plane that is perpendicular to the axis; and the first plane is spaced apart from the second plane by a spacing (“vertically separated by a distance of about 18 inches”; Col 16 Line 35). 5. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, further comprising a housing positioned within the opening, the stator configured to pivot about the housing; and wherein the first rotor is laterally positioned in relation to the second rotor (compare lengths in Figs. 12 and 13). 6. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of first blades and the plurality of second blades are to rotate in a same direction around the axis, and a number of the plurality of first blades equals a number of the plurality of second blades; and the plurality of first blades and the plurality of second blades are to rotate in a different direction around the axis, and a number of the plurality of first blades is different from a number of the plurality of second blades (counter rotating). 7. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein the stator comprises a plurality of first stator magnets positioned on first side of a plane and a plurality of second stator magnets positioned on a second side of the plane, the second side opposite the first side (see magnets in Fig. 2). 8. (Original) The vehicle of claim 7, wherein the plurality of first stator magnets are magnetically coupled to the first rotor and the plurality of second stator magnets are magnetically coupled to the second rotor (see magnets in Fig. 2). 9. (Original) The vehicle of claim 7, further comprising a housing fixedly coupled to the body via an elongated member; and wherein the plurality of first stator magnets and the plurality of second stator magnets are arranged between (i) the housing and (ii) the first rotor and the second rotor (see magnets in Fig. 2). 10. (Original) The vehicle of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of first blades are configured to pivot relative to the first rotor and the plurality of second blades are configured to pivot relative to the second rotor ((i.e., the pitch of each rotor blade 318 is adjusted in unison”; Col 16 line 42). Claims 11 – 15 are rejected using the same basis as above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN M O'HARA whose telephone number is (571)270-5224. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN M O'HARA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706434
AIRPLANE CONFIGURED WITH A HIGH INTENSITY PULSE LASER GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686511
PAYLOAD ASSEMBLY FOR MOBILE PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673778
SAFETY DEVICE AND FLIGHT VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH SAFETY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668355
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DEPLOYING ADJACENT TRAILING EDGE FLAPS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668359
UNIVERSAL-JOINT ROTOR-HUB METHOD AND SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.3%)
3y 1m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month