Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/111,164

MULTIPLE INPUT-MULTIPLE OUTPUT RADIO FREQUENCY POWER HARVESTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 12, 2025
Priority
Dec 02, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022136111
Examiner
GANNON, LEVI
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1258 granted / 1521 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1557
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1521 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zeine et al. (US 2021/0408833; “Zeine”). Regarding claim 1, Zeine teaches an apparatus (figure 4) comprising: at least two antennas (490A-490N); a signal combiner component (455) that includes at least two combiner inputs (from antennas 490A-490N), each combiner input being electrically coupled to a respective antenna of the at least two antennas (490A-490N); and a rectifier component (450) that includes a rectifier input electrically coupled to a combiner output of the signal combiner component (455). As for claim 2, Zeine teaches a rechargeable battery (420) that includes a battery input that is electrically coupled to a rectifier output of the rectifier component (450). As for claim 3, Zeine teaches wherein the signal combiner component (455) is configured to: receive, from each antenna of the at least two antennas (490A-490N), a respective signal from the antenna based at least in part on electrically coupling the antenna to a respective combiner input of the at least two combiner inputs (See configuration of figure 4 and para. [0053]); combine each respective signal together to generate a combined signal (para. [0053]); and output the combined signal based at least in part on using the combiner output (para. [0053]). Regarding claim 4, Zeine teaches wherein the signal combiner component (455) is configured to: receive, from each antenna of the at least two antennas (490A-490N), a respective signal from the antenna based at least in part on electrically coupling the antenna to a respective combiner input of the at least two combiner inputs (See configuration of figure 4); generate, for each respective signal, a respective modified signal (See control line from control logic 410 to combiner 455); combine the respective modified signal with one or more other modified signals to generate a combined signal (output of 455); and output the combined signal based at least in part on using the combiner output (para. [0053]). As for claim 5, Zeine teaches an energy meter (440/410) that includes: an energy meter input (input of 440) that is electrically coupled to a rectifier output of the rectifier component (450); and an energy meter output (output of 410 to combiner 455) that is electrically coupled to one combiner input of the at least two combiner inputs, wherein the signal combiner component (455) is configured to generate the respective modified signal based at least in part on the energy meter output (from control logic 410). Regarding claim 6, Zeine teaches wherein the signal combiner component, to generate the respective modified signal, is further configured to: select a respective modification for the respective signal based at least in part on optimizing a power level of the combined signal (Zeine teaches controlling elements of the wireless power receiver 400 base on various inputs including measurements from the power meter 440, the battery 420, and motion sensor 495. Para. [0053]-[0057]). Regarding claim 7, Zeine teaches an energy meter (440/410) that includes: an energy meter input (input of 440) that is electrically coupled to a rectifier output of the rectifier component (450); and an energy meter output (output of 410 to combiner 455) that is electrically coupled to one combiner input of the at least two combiner inputs, wherein the signal combiner component (455) is configured to select the respective modification based at least in part on the energy meter output (from control logic 410). Claim 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Arnitz et al. (US 2020/0119591; “Arnitz”). Regarding claim 8, Arnitz teaches an apparatus (figure 4) comprising: at least two antennas (405); at least two rectifier components (415), each rectifier component being electrically coupled to one or more antennas of the at least two antennas (405); and a signal combiner component (422) that is electrically coupled to at least one rectifier component of the at least two rectifier components (415). As for claim 9, Arnitz teaches a rechargeable battery (425; para. [0059]) that includes a battery input that is electrically coupled to a combiner output of the signal combiner component (422). As for claim 10, Arnitz teaches wherein, for each antenna of the at least two antennas (405), the antenna is electrically coupled to a rectifier input of a respective rectifier component of the at least two rectifier components (415). Regarding claim 11, Arnitz teaches at least one signal filter (410; Impedance-matching components 410 block power signals and harmonics. Para. [0044]), wherein at least one rectifier component (415) is electrically coupled to an antenna of the at least two antennas (405) based at least in part on the at least one signal filter (410). As for claim 12, Arnitz teaches wherein the signal combiner component (422) comprises at least two combiner inputs (from converters 420), and wherein each combiner input (inputs to 422) of the at least two combiner inputs is electrically coupled to a rectifier output of a respective rectifier component (415) of the at least two rectifier components (415). Claims 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ma et al. (CN 108847722; “Ma”). Regarding claim 18, Ma teaches an apparatus (figure 1) comprising: at least two antennas (20); at least two power splitter components (22), each power splitter component being electrically coupled to one or more antennas of the at least two antennas (20); and at least two rectifier components (21), each rectifier component being electrically coupled to one or more power splitter components (22). As for claim 19, Ma teaches a rechargeable battery that is electrically coupled to a respective rectifier output of each rectifier component of the at least two rectifier components (The device of Ma is drawn to a charging device for a mobile phone, Bluetooth earphone, or tablet computer. Mobile phones, Bluetooth earphones, and tablet computers comprise batteries that are rechargeable to supply power to the mobile phone, Bluetooth earphone, and tablet computer.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arnitz in view of Logan et al. (US 2018/0337563; “Logan”). Regarding claim 13, Arnitz teaches wherein the signal combiner component (422) comprises at least two combiner inputs (see figure 4), wherein the at least two antennas comprise at least a first antenna (uppermost antenna 405 in figure 4) and a second antenna (lowermost antenna 405 in figure 4), wherein the first antenna (uppermost antenna 405) is electrically coupled to a first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415) of the at least two rectifier components (415), and wherein the second antenna (lowermost antenna 405) is electrically coupled to a second rectifier component (lowermost rectifier 415) of the at least two rectifier components (415). Arnitz fails to teach the first antenna being part of a first antenna group and the second antenna being part of a second antenna group. However, it is well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art to connect a group of antennas to a single rectifier device. For example, see antennas 406/408 connected to rectifier device 306 in figure 5 of Logan. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to connect a group of antennas to each rectifying device of Arnitz because such a modification would have been implementing a well-known power receiver configuration. Regarding claim 14, Arnitz modified by Logan teaches wherein the first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415) comprises multiple rectifier inputs (as modified by Logan), and wherein, for each antenna of the first antenna group, the antenna is electrically coupled to a respective rectifier input of the multiple rectifier inputs (See figure 4 of Arnitz and figure 5 of Logan). As for claim 15, Arnitz teaches wherein the signal combiner component (422) comprises at least: a first combiner input (connected to uppermost rectifier 415) that is electrically coupled to a first rectifier output of the first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415), and a second combiner input (connected to lowermost rectifier 415) that is electrically coupled to a second rectifier output of the second rectifier component (lowermost rectifier 415). As for claim 16, Arnitz modified by Logan teaches wherein the signal combiner (422) component is a first signal combiner component (portion of 422 coupled to uppermost rectifying device 415), wherein the first antenna group (uppermost antenna 405 of Arnitz modified by Logan) is electrically coupled to the first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415) based at least in part on the first signal combiner component (422) being electrically coupled to the first antenna group (uppermost antenna 405 of Arnitz modified by Logan) and the first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415), and wherein the second antenna group (lowermost antenna 405 of Arnitz modified by Logan) is electrically coupled to the second rectifier component (lowermost rectifier 415) based at least in part on a second signal combiner (portion of 422 coupled to lowermost rectifying device 415) component that is electrically coupled to the second antenna group (lowermost antenna 405 of Arnitz modified by Logan) and the second rectifier component (lowermost rectifier 415). Regarding claim 17, Arnitz modified by Logan teaches wherein, for each antenna of the first antenna group (uppermost antenna 405 of Arnitz modified by Logan), the antenna is electrically coupled to a respective combiner input of the at least two combiner inputs of the first signal combiner component (422), and wherein a combiner output of the first signal combiner component (portion of 422 coupled to uppermost rectifying device 415) is electrically coupled to a rectifier input of the first rectifier component (uppermost rectifier 415). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Leabman et al. (US 2018/0226840) teaches multiple antennas, multiple rectifiers, and signal combiners. Figures 5-7. Ting et al. (US 2021/0359656) teaches multiple antennas, multiple rectifiers, and a power splitter. Figures 2-3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEVI GANNON whose telephone number is (571)272-7971. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEVI GANNON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836 September 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771164
HYBRID UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761281
MANAGED FAST CHARGING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759419
VEHICLE WITH POWER CONVERSION UNIT
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756333
A METHOD OF CONTROLLING POWER DELIVERED TO AN ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749826
MULTI-ANTENNA ARRANGEMENT AND ITS CONNECTING METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1521 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month