Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/111,545

TABBING DEVICE AND TABBING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 13, 2025
Priority
Sep 13, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0114944 +2 more
Examiner
MALLEY JR., DANIEL PATRICK
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Hanwha Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
281 granted / 493 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
546
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
83.9%
+43.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-5, 8-9, 11-12, 14-16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 3, Applicant recites, “and the other above”. Its unclear if this phrase is corresponding to one of the plurality of bodies or a different element. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 3, Applicant recites, “one body”. Its unclear if this phrase is corresponding to one of the plurality of bodies or a different element. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 3, Applicant recites, “the other body”. Its unclear if this phrase is corresponding to one of the plurality of bodies or a different element. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 4, Applicant recites, “different sets of solar cells and wire jigs”. Its unclear if this also includes the solar cell and wire jig recited in claim 1. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 5, Applicant recites, “a solar cell and wire jig of one set…a solar cell and wire jig of one set on the wire”. Its unclear if one of these also corresponding to the solar cell and wire recited in claim 1. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 8, Applicant recites, “the aligned solar cell”. Its unclear if this corresponds to the solar cell already recited or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 9, Applicant recites, “one or more solar cells”. Its unclear if this also includes the solar cell already recited. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 11, Applicant recites, “the solar cell when the transferred solar cell”. Its unclear if the solar cell is the transferred solar cell or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 11, Applicant recites, “the position-corrected solar cell”. Its unclear if the position-corrected solar cell is the originally introduced solar cell or the transferred solar cell. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 11, Applicant recites, “the solar cell division device divides the solar cell determined to be a good product by the solar cell inspection device into a predetermined size”. Its unclear what is being further limited by this limitation. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 12, Applicant recites, “the solar cell determined to be a defective product”. Its unclear if this corresponds to the originally introduced solar cell or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 12, Applicant recites, “the solar cell is a good product”. Its unclear if this corresponds to the originally introduced solar cell or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 14, Applicant recites, “the solar cells”. Its unclear if this corresponds to the originally introduced solar cell or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 15, Applicant recites, “wherein the first solar cell transfer device includes two first solar cell transfer devices each corresponding to the solar cell supply device”. Its unclear if the two first solar cell transfer devices are distinct elements or if they correspond to being the actual solar cell supply device. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 15, Applicant recites, “two solar cells”. This phrase lacks antecedent basis and its unclear if this also includes the solar cell already recited. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 16, Applicant recites, “supported on a stage with any one body by a cell-jig transfer device including a plurality of bodies”. Its unclear if the “any one body” corresponds to the cell-jig transfer and/or the plurality of bodies. Appropriate action is required. Regarding Claim 18, Applicant recites, “the aligned solar cell”. Its unclear if this corresponds to the solar cell already recited or if a different solar cell is being introduced. Appropriate action is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 6-7, 10, 13 and 17 are allowed. Claims 2-5, 8-9, 11-12, 14-16, and 18-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wu (CN-216488103-U). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL P MALLEY JR. whose telephone number is (571)270-1638. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-430pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey T Barton can be reached at 571-272-1307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL P MALLEY JR./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2025
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683543
DEPLOYABLE ARRAY STRUCTURE AND ASSEMBLY INCLUDING THE ARRAY STRUCTURE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680731
SOLAR TABLE CLAMP
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12604541
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION MODULE, PADDLE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION MODULE
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581788
SOLAR CELL AND SOLAR CELL MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580521
SOLAR MODULE SYSTEM, SOLAR SYSTEM, AND MOUNTING METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+45.5%)
2y 8m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month