Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/111,836

AGRICULTURAL HEADER WITH A DRAPER BELT AND A SEAL COUPLED TO A ROLLER MOUNT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 14, 2025
Priority
Aug 30, 2022 — provisional 63/402,312 +1 more
Examiner
HARCOURT, BRAD
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
CNH Industrial N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1212 granted / 1437 resolved
+32.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1473
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1437 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7, 8, 14, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Childs et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0207682). In reference to claim 1, Childs an agricultural header 150 for an agricultural vehicle 15 (Fig. 1, par. 0028), comprising: a header frame 101; at least one cutter 111 carried by the header frame 101 and configured to cut crop material (par. 0029); and a draper belt assembly carried by the header frame, the draper belt assembly comprising: a roller (par. 0050) supported by the header frame 101; a draper belt 140/540 wrapped around the roller such that rotation of the roller drives the draper belt 140/540 (par. 0050); a roller mount coupling the roller to the header frame 101 (no roller mount is explicitly disclosed, but some roller mount inherently must be present for the roller to function); and a seal 528 coupled to the roller mount such that adjustment of the roller mount causes a corresponding adjustment of both the roller and the seal 528 (par. 0050, “tensioner roller” as known in the art is used to apply tension to the draper belt; operation of the tensioner roller would result in adjusting the roller mount and the seal as tension applied to the belt would also apply to the seal 528). In reference to claim 7, Childs discloses that the seal 528 comprises at least one of a polymer or rubber (par. 0044). In reference to claim 8, Childs discloses an agricultural vehicle 15 (Fig. 1), comprising: a chassis 13; and a header 150 carried by the chassis 13, the header 150 comprising: a header frame 101; at least one cutter 111 carried by the header frame 101 and configured to cut crop material (par. 0029); and a draper belt assembly carried by the header frame 101, the draper belt assembly comprising: a roller (par. 0050) supported by the header frame 101; a draper belt 140/540 wrapped around the roller such that rotation of the roller drives the draper belt 140/540 (par. 0050); a roller mount coupling the roller to the header frame 101 (no roller mount is explicitly disclosed, but some roller mount inherently must be present for the roller to function); and a seal 528 coupled to the roller mount such that adjustment of the roller mount causes a corresponding adjustment of both the roller and the seal 528 (par. 0050, “tensioner roller” as known in the art is used to apply tension to the draper belt; operation of the tensioner roller would result in adjusting the roller mount and the seal as tension applied to the belt would also apply to the seal 528). In reference to claim 14, Childs discloses that the seal 528 comprises at least one of a polymer or rubber (par. 0044). In reference to claim 15, Childs discloses a method of adjusting a roller (par. 0050) and a draper belt 140/540 of an agricultural header 150 comprising a header frame 101 and at least one cutter 111 carried by the header frame 101 and configured to cut crop material, the method comprising: wrapping the draper belt 140/540 around the roller such that rotation of the roller drives the draper belt 140/540 (Fig. 1, par. 0050); coupling the roller to the header frame 101 with a roller mount (no roller mount is explicitly disclosed, but some roller mount inherently must be present for the roller to function), the roller mount having a seal 528 coupled thereto; and adjusting a position of the roller mount relative to the header frame 101 par. 0050), wherein adjusting the position of the roller mount also adjusts a corresponding position of both the roller and the seal (par. 0050, “tensioner roller” as known in the art is used to apply tension to the draper belt; operation of the tensioner roller would result in adjusting the roller mount and the seal as tension applied to the belt would also apply to the seal 528). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 12 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Childs et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0207682) in view of Cook et al. (US Patent No. 10,920,851). In reference to claims 5, 12 and 19, Childs fails to disclose that the roller defines an axis of rotation and the seal defines a longest dimension that extends in parallel with the axis of rotation. Cook discloses a seal 200 that extends in a dimension that extends parallel with the axis of rotation of the roller (Figs. 1 and 2). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to form the seal so that it extends in a direction parallel to the roller with a reasonable expectation of success as it amounts to a rearrangement of the existing parts of the invention without altering their function. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 6, 9-11, 13, 16-18 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. White et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0127579) discloses a seal 138 and a tensioner 110 for a roller 96 (Fig. 6) and Cook (US Patent Application Publication No. 2018/0338425) discloses a seal 100 for a roller 202 (Fig. 4). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRAD HARCOURT whose telephone number is (571)272-7303. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571)272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRAD HARCOURT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 9/18/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765468
DUAL PIVOT DROP FLOOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765461
Forage Harvesters
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757832
Forage Harvester
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757830
FLOATING CUTTERBAR ON ROTARY HEADER
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760632
AUTOMATED DIAGNOSTICS OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION IN A SYSTEM FOR FRACTURING A WELL AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month