Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/111,960

HEATING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 16, 2022 — DE 10 2022 003 419.0 +1 more
Examiner
REDHEAD JR., ASHLEY L
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
321 granted / 353 resolved
+38.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
370
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
§103
85.7%
+45.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 353 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of the Application The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims This action is in response to the applicant’s filing on March 14, 2025. Claims 7 – 12 are new. Claims 7 – 12 are pending and examined below. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on March 14, 2025 has been considered by the Examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in The Republic of Germany on September 16, 2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 7 – 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over World Patent Application Publication No. WO 2019/243709 A1 to BOUBAKER MOHAMED-AMINE et al. (herein after "Boubaker") in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2006/0267321 A1 to Harish et al. (herein after "Harish"), and further in view of German Patent No. DE10 2019/000334 A1 to KELLER JENS et al. (herein after "Keller"). (Note: Claim language is in bold typeface, and the Examiner’s comments and cited passages from the prior art reference(s) are in normal typeface.) As to Claim 7, (New) Boubaker’s heating surface temperature control system discloses a heating system of a vehicle (see ¶0081; Boubaker ~ "regulating the temperature of a heating surface of a radiant panel intended to be installed inside a vehicle passenger compartment… radiant panel 1… placed in a… seat"), the heating system comprising: panel heating elements arranged on objects in the vehicle and configured to heat an interior of the vehicle by thermal radiation (see ¶0081; Boubaker), wherein a temperature control area is assigned to at least one vehicle seat of the vehicle (see ¶0081; Boubaker), wherein at least one of the panel heating elements is assigned to the vehicle seat with a temperature control area (see ¶0081; Boubaker ~ "regulating the temperature of a heating surface of a radiant panel intended to be installed inside a vehicle passenger compartment… radiant panel 1… placed in a… seat"); and means for specifying a heating power of the at least one of the panel heating elements assigned to the vehicle seat with the temperature control area as a function of the heating requirement of the vehicle occupant (see ¶0024 ~ "method for regulating the temperature of a heating surface of a radiant panel includes…. Determining the maximum temperature tolerated by a passenger of the vehicle" and ¶0025 ~ "maximum temperature tolerated by a passenger… adapts to the particular profile of each passenger" and ¶0101 ~ "The tolerated temperature depends on the person's sensitivity to heat... the part of the body concerned"), the distance (see ¶0018; Boubaker), and at least one of the sitting position, the position of the limbs, or the posture of the vehicle occupant. (See ¶0024; Boubaker ~ "a high-frequency radar allowing us to know... physiological state and... the positioning of their body"). Keller’s vehicle seat heating device is then relied upon to disclose a means for determining a heating requirement of a vehicle occupant located on the vehicle seat with the temperature control area (see ¶0019; Keller ~ "heat distribution of the… heat generator depending on.. A user position… heat distribution… depending on a user's temperature condition" and ¶0043; Keller); and an optical sensor unit (see ¶0020; Keller ~ "proximity sensors which are configured to detect an object approaching the at least one heating surface… proximity sensors are… capacitive proximity sensors… arranged between the radiating elements or radiating sections of the heat generator") configured to determine a sitting position, a position of limbs, or posture of the vehicle occupant. (See ¶0020; Keller ~ control device of heating device determines when a seated user shifts position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Boubaker’s heating surface temperature control system with an optical sensor unit (proximity sensor), as taught by Keller, to provide a non-contact based temperature control between an occupant’s body part(s) position and a heating panel element, thereby enabling benefits, including but not limited to: more precise, localized heating of a seated vehicle occupant’s respective body part(s). Harish’s on-board vehicle seat capacitive force sensing device is then introduced to disclose a capacitive sensor unit configured to detect a distance between a body part of the vehicle occupant (see ¶0006 and ¶0062; Harish) and the at least one of the panel heating elements assigned to the vehicle seat (see ¶0006 and ¶0062; Harish), wherein the capacitive sensor unit is integrated in the at least one of the panel heating elements assigned to the vehicle seat. (See ¶0006; Harish ~ "an on-board vehicle seat capacitance force sensing apparatus... includes... mounted... a base structure of a seat in a vehicle... a sensor in the housing to generate a measurement based on a change in a distance between the upper conductive surface and the lower conductive surface when the cover plate is deflected by a force applied on the cover plate" and ¶0062; Harish ~ "heat detection system (e.g., the temperature module 904) of the vehicle 900 covering a substantial surface of the front seat 906 and/or the back seat 908 may be able to increase an accuracy of locating a position of the occupant 902 through registering heat generated by a body of the occupant 902. Furthermore, a machine vision module may be used as a sensor coupled to the electronic circuit module 960 to collect and communicate"). Consequently, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Boubaker’s heating surface temperature control system with a seat capacitance force sensing device, as taught by Harish, to provide a distance measurement between an occupant’s body part(s) position, thereby enabling benefits, including but not limited to: more precise, localized heating of a seated vehicle occupant’s respective body part(s). As to Claim 8, (New) Boubaker/Keller/Harish discloses the heating system of claim 7, further comprising: an optical sensor unit configured to determine a height or a clothing state of the vehicle occupant (see ¶0020; Keller ~ "proximity sensors"), wherein the height or the clothing state of the vehicle occupant is accounted for in the determination of the heating requirement of the vehicle occupant located on the vehicle seat. (See ¶0058; Boubaker ~ "the vehicle's passenger compartment includes at least one sensor arranged to measure a parameter used to determine at least one of the representative data of the thermal environment around the radiant panel. The sensor is chosen from", ¶0059; Boubaker ~ "a DMS camera to identify or characterize passengers, particularly the driver", ¶0060; Boubaker ~ "an infrared camera installed to observe the radiative surface in the dome"). As to Claim 9, (New) Boubaker/Keller/Harish discloses the heating system of claim 7, wherein the optical sensor unit has an optical camera as an optical imaging unit. (See ¶0058; Boubaker ~ "the vehicle's passenger compartment includes at least one sensor arranged to measure a parameter used to determine at least one of the representative data of the thermal environment around the radiant panel. The sensor is chosen from", ¶0059; Boubaker ~ "a DMS camera to identify or characterize passengers, particularly the driver", ¶0060; Boubaker ~ "an infrared camera installed to observe the radiative surface in the dome"). As to Claim 10, (New) Boubaker/Keller/Harish discloses the heating system of claim 7, further comprising: a thermal sensor unit configured as a heat imaging camera (see ¶0036 ~ "thermal parameter specific to the material: effusivity, thermal conductivity, heat capacity, density, etc."), which is configured to detect a surface temperature of body parts of the vehicle occupant located on the vehicle seat to determine the heating requirement of the vehicle occupant located on the vehicle seat with a temperature control area. (Boubaker determines as in ¶0093 ~ "the sensitivity of a part of the body likely to come into contact with the heating surface, in particular the sensitivity of a hand, an arm and/or a foot"). As to Claim 11, (New) Boubaker/Keller/Harish discloses the heating system of claim 7, wherein the at least one of the panel heating elements is integrated into an interior component of the vehicle or is arranged on the interior component of the vehicle. (See ¶0027; Keller ~ "at least one heating surface of the heating device is integrated into the backrest of the vehicle seat "). As to Claim 12, (New) Boubaker/Keller/Harish discloses the heating system of claim 7, wherein the means for specifying the heating power is a control device of the vehicle. (See ¶0024; Boubaker ~ "method for regulating the temperature of a heating surface of a radiant panel includes…. Determining the maximum temperature tolerated by a passenger of the vehicle" and ¶0025 ~ "maximum temperature tolerated by a passenger… adapts to the particular profile of each passenger"). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to ASHLEY L. REDHEAD, JR. whose telephone number is (571) 272 - 6952. The Examiner can normally be reached on weekdays, Monday through Thursday, between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s Supervisor, Peter Nolan can be reached Monday through Friday, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. at (571) 270 – 7016. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY L REDHEAD JR./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682740
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VARIABLE REPORTING OF SENSOR DATA
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679357
Method for Assisting a User of a Vehicle During an Automated Transverse Guidance of the Vehicle on a Road Having a Branch Taking Into Account a Preceding Vehicle, Computing Device and Driver Assistance System
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673697
METHOD FOR IMPROVING SAFETY OF AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BY RECOGNIZING DAMAGED MOTOR VEHICLES AND RISKY DRIVERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669332
NAVIGATION ASSISTANCE METHOD AND DEVICE BASED ON A KALMAN FILTER
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662118
CONTROL METHOD AND CONTROL APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE TRAVELING, AND VEHICLE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 3m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 353 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month