Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/113,983

WIRING BOARD, ELECTRONIC COMPONENT STORAGE PACKAGE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — JP 2022-158012 +1 more
Examiner
YALDO, ABIGAIL AMIR
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
59 granted / 63 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
80
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2-3 and 5-10 depend upon rejected claim 1 and inherit the deficiency thereby. Claim 1, Line 4, “a waveguide of a waveguide-type” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to what the “waveguide-type” is intended to further convey, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Claim 4, Line 2, “a width of the waveguide” is unclear to one of ordinary skill in the art as to how this is related to the “a width Wa of the waveguide at the second end part”, as previously defined in claim 1, from which this claim depends, thereby leaving the boundaries of the claim unclear. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cheng (US 8669834). As per Claims 1 and 8: Cheng discloses in Figure 15: A wiring board (B1, as shown in annotated related Figure 5A by Image 1 below, which is evidently a printed circuit board (PCB) as there are through-holes formed within the PCB, [Col. 1, Lines 62-63]) comprising a base body (the bottom “copper layer” as shown in Figure 15, and corresponding to “bottom layer” 15, as shown in related Figure 1) with a signal line (S1, as shown below in annotated Image 2, which is evidently a microstrip due to the “microstrip-to-SIW transition at each end”, [Col. 18, Lines 59-61], as shown in Figure 15) having a first end part that is one end of the signal line in a signal transmission direction (E1 corresponding to the end part of the microstrip line S1 in the y direction which is inherently the signal transmission direction, as per the microstrip-to-SIW transition at each end defining the signal transmission directions, [Col. 18, Lines 59-61], as shown below in annotated Image 2), and the width (“Wtrans”, being the width of S1 as the first end part, E1) of the signal line (S1) gradually increases toward the first end part (as per Claim 8, the width of S1 at E1 is evidently gradually greater than the width away from the first end part, corresponding to T1 as shown in annotated Image 2 below), and with a waveguide of a waveguide-type (“SIW”, [Col. 18, Line 59]) having a second end part (E2 corresponding to the end part of the SIW, as further shown by the “LSIW” length, as shown below in annotated Image 2) that is one end of the waveguide in the signal transmission direction (the y direction), a center part in the signal transmission direction (C1, as shown below in annotated Image 2, within the y (signal transmission) direction), and an intermediate part on a side of the second end part closer to the center part (I1, as shown below in annotated Image 2, is closer to C1 and on a side of E2), wherein the first end part (E1) and the second end part (E2) are coupled to one another (as is evident by the connections of the SIW as shown in Figure 15) and a width Wa of the waveguide at the second end part (corresponding to the width “W” as shown in Figure 15) is wider than a width Wb of the waveguide at the intermediate part (corresponding to “WSIW” as shown in Figure 15, WSIW is 1.5mm and W is 3mm, therefore W is evidently wider than WSIW, [Col. 18, Lines 63-67]). PNG media_image1.png 275 463 media_image1.png Greyscale Image 1 PNG media_image2.png 447 515 media_image2.png Greyscale Image 2 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL YALDO whose telephone number is (703)756-1784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL AMIR YALDO/ Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739967
Core Resonance Suppression in Signal Integrity Optimized Package
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738917
RF IMPEDANCE MATCHING NETWORK WITH CLAMPING CIRCUIT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738623
COUPLER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732149
DIFFERENTIAL DIGITAL STEP ATTENUATORS WITH LEAKAGE CANCELLATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12706360
DUAL-MODE DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTER AND DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTERING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month