Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/114,147

OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2022 — FR FR2209863 +1 more
Examiner
ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Aledia
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
52%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
195 granted / 464 resolved
-20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
504
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 464 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 9, and 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Im (US Patent Publication No. 2017/0084220) in view of Kawasaki (US Patent Publication No. 2009/0066615). With reference to claim 1, Im discloses a pixel comprising: a light emitting element (EL) and a first transistor (TD) coupled in series between a reference node (ELVDD) and a supply node (ELVSS) (see paragraphs 47-60; Fig. 1); and a first circuit (150) comprising a first terminal coupled to the control terminal of the first transistor (TD), a second terminal coupled to the reference node (ELVDD) (see paragraphs 48-50; Fig. 1), the first circuit (150) being configured to generate a control voltage on the first terminal (in teaching initialization voltage; see paragraphs 48-50), the first circuit (150) comprising a variable voltage divider configured to provide the control voltage on the first terminal (in teaching capacitors (C1, C2) in series form a voltage divider at node N4 provided with varying scan voltages; see paragraphs 54-55, 63-65), the variable voltage divider comprising two capacitive branches (C1, C2), and a first switch (T2) coupled between the first terminal of the first circuit (150) and a conductive terminal of the first transistor (see paragraphs 51-53, 63-65; Fig. 1). While disclosing features as explained Im, fails to specifically teach the ratio of the capacitance values as recited. Kawasaki discloses a display panel comprising a panel light emitting device (EL), a first transistor (M4), and a first circuit (C1, CH); the first circuit comprising a variable voltage divider (see paragraphs 60-61; Fig. 1), the voltage divider comprising capacitive branches, the ratio of the capacitance values between the branches being variable (the voltage of the voltage divider can be adjusted based on the capacitance ratio of the capacitors (C1, CH); see paragraphs 59-61; Fig. 1). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to allow the usage of a capacitance ratio similar to that which is taught by Kawaski to be carried out in a pixel arrangement similar to that which is taught by Im to thereby improve image quality (see Kim; paragraph 78). With reference to claim 2, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses wherein the voltage divider comprises a first capacitor (C2) coupled between the first and second terminals of the first circuit (in teaching one terminal connected to reference node and the node (N1); see paragraphs 47-60; Fig. 1). With reference to claim 3, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses wherein the first circuit (150) comprises a third terminal coupled to a node of application of a data signal (in teaching receiving SL(n-1) and SCAN(n-1); see paragraphs 47-60; Fig. 1). With reference to claim 4, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 3, Im further discloses wherein the voltage divider comprises a second capacitor (120) coupled between the first terminal of the first circuit (106) and the third terminal (118) of the first circuit. With reference to claim 9 Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses wherein the first transistor and the element are coupled in series with a fifth switch (T4) (see paragraphs 47-60; Fig. 1). With reference to claim 11, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses a display screen comprising a plurality of pixels (see paragraph 47; Fig. 4) With reference to claim 12, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses wherein the pixels are disposed in an array and the third terminal (118) of each first circuit (150) is configured to receive a voltage common to all the pixels of a same row (in teaching SCAN(n-1) applied to pixels in a row; see paragraphs 47-60; Figs 1-2, 4). With reference to claim 13, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses wherein the light emitting elements (EL) are coupled with a common cathode (see paragraph 47-49, 57; Fig. 1), the elements of each pixel being coupled between the first transistor (TD) of said pixel and the reference node (connection to the ELVSS signal line; see paragraphs 47-49; Fig. 1). With reference to claim 14, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses a first phase during which the first switch (T2) is closed and the capacitors of the voltage dividers coupled between the first and second terminals of the first circuit are charged (in teaching period P1, the SCAN signal is low, C1 and C2 are charged), and a second phase during which the first switch (120) is open (in teaching period P3 the SCAN signal is high, the first witch is open; see paragraphs 62-67; Fig. 2). With reference to claim 15, Im and Kawaski disclose the pixel according to claim 1, Im further discloses, comprising an alternance of first and second phases (see steps P1-P3; Fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. KITAZAWA et al. (US2007/0273619) discloses a circuit for driving an electro-optical element having a first, second, and third capacitive element for controlling voltages supplied to the electro-optical element (see paragraphs 45-82; Figs. 1-10). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-4, 9-, and 11-15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALECIA DIANE ENGLISH whose telephone number is (571)270-1595. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 7:00am-3:00am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alecia D English/Examiner, Art Unit 2625 571-270-1595
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748467
BASE ASSEMBLIES FOR KNOB ON DISPLAY DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743161
Device Connection Establishment Method and Terminal Device
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12724505
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12711899
PIXEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706019
DISPLAY SYSTEM AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
52%
With Interview (+9.7%)
3y 8m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 464 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month