Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/115,309

POWER GENERATION FACILITY AND POWER OUTPUT METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Examiner
LAM, ALEX W
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Powerx Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
250 granted / 272 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
286
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 272 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kibbee et al. (US 2012/0038210 A1) in view of Yasugi et al. (US 2012/0049517 A1) in further view of Stephens et al. (US 2025/0012515 A1). In regards to claim 1, Kibbee discloses, in figure 3, a power generation facility (314) used in a power transmission system (300) that charges a storage battery (110’’) mounted on a moving body (105’’) with power generated by the power generation facility (314) (Par 0040); and feeds the power from the storage battery (110’’) transported by the moving body (105’’) to a power receiving facility (Fig. 1A; transmission facility 102) (Par 0034), the power generation facility (314) comprising: a power generator (Par 0040; “Also shown in FIG. 3 is floating power production source 314 which may be an offshore platform having generators powered by stranded natural gas produced offshore at or near platform 314.”). Kibbee does not disclose an alternating current-direct current converter that converts alternating-current power generated by the power generator to direct-current power. However, Yasugi discloses, in figure 1, an alternating current-direct current converter (30A) that converts alternating-current power generated by the power generator (20) to direct-current power (Par 0052-0053). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including an alternating current-direct current converter that converts alternating-current power generated by the power generator to direct-current power as taught by Yasugi in order to convert a voltage level that is suitable for charging (Par 0054; Yasugi). Kibbee and Yasugi does not disclose wherein the direct-current power is transmitted to an outside of the facility using a cable. However, Stephens discloses, in figure 2, wherein the direct-current power is transmitted to an outside of the facility (offshore switching station 250) using a cable (cable connected from 202 to 250 via 252) (Par 0160). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including wherein the direct-current power is transmitted to an outside of the facility using a cable as taught by Stephens in order to combine and/or convert the electrical outputs from the various wind turbine generators into a one or more outputs that can be connected to a corresponding electrical connector (Par 0160; Stephens). In regards to claim 2, Kibbee, Yasugi, and Stephens disclose the power generation facility according to claim 1. Kibbee further discloses, in figure 3, wherein the power generation facility (314) is configured as a wind power generation facility installed offshore (Par 0011, 0040). In regards to claim 3, Kibbee, Yasugi, and Stephens disclose the power generation facility according to claim 1. Stephens further discloses, in figure 2, wherein the cable is a direct-current transmission line (cable connected from 202 to 250 via 252) to a relay facility (offshore switching station 250) that feeds power to the moving body (112a) (Par 0160). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including a relay facility that feeds power to the moving body as taught by Stephens in order to combine and/or convert the electrical outputs from the various wind turbine generators into a one or more outputs that can be connected to a corresponding electrical connector (Par 0160; Stephens). In regards to claim 4, Kibbee, Yasugi, and Stephens disclose the power generation facility according to claim 1. Yasugi further discloses, in figure 3, comprising a direct-current voltage converter (32) that converts a voltage value (output voltage of 30A) of direct-current voltage that is output of the alternating current-direct current converter (30A) to a voltage value corresponding to the cable (Par 0053-0054). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including a direct-current voltage converter that converts a voltage value of direct-current voltage that is output of the alternating current-direct current converter to a voltage value corresponding to the cable as taught by Yasugi in order to convert a voltage level that is suitable for charging (Par 0054; Yasugi). In regards to claim 5, Kibbee discloses, in figure 3, a power output method of a power generation facility (314) used in a power transmission system (300) that charges a storage battery (110’’) mounted on a moving body (105’’) with power generated by the power generation facility (314) (Par 0040); and feeds power from the storage battery (110’’) transported by the moving body (105’’) to a power receiving facility (Fig. 1A; transmission facility 102) (Par 0034). Kibbee does not disclose wherein alternating-current power generated by a power generator is converted to direct- current power. However, Yasugi discloses, in figure 1, wherein alternating-current power generated by a power generator (20) is converted to direct- current power (30A) (Par 0052-0053). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including wherein alternating-current power generated by a power generator is converted to direct- current power as taught by Yasugi in order to convert a voltage level that is suitable for charging (Par 0054; Yasugi). Kibbee and Yasugi does not disclose the power is transmitted to an outside of the facility using a cable in the form of direct current. However, Stephens discloses, in figure 2, the power is transmitted to an outside of the facility (offshore switching station 250) using a cable (cable connected from 202 to 250 via 252) in the form of direct current (Par 0160). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kibbee’s power production source generator by including the power is transmitted to an outside of the facility using a cable in the form of direct current as taught by Stephens in order to combine and/or convert the electrical outputs from the various wind turbine generators into a one or more outputs that can be connected to a corresponding electrical connector (Par 0160; Stephens). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX WONG LAM whose telephone number is (571)272-3409. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln D. Donovan can be reached at (571)-272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX W LAM/Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600251
Electric Work Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600309
POWER SOURCE CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597810
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING FOREIGN MATTER, HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592588
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER COUPLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592563
BATTERY PACK AND ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+1.5%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 272 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month