Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/115,657

THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE INSPECTION DEVICE AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE INSPECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0124335 +1 more
Examiner
STAFIRA, MICHAEL PATRICK
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Koh Young Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1140 granted / 1292 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1319
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1292 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: a spatial light modulator (Claim 1, 15) a optical system (Claim 1, 10-11) a filter unit (Claim 1) a controller (Claim 2, 4-12) a focus adjuster (Claim 4, 6-8, 13) Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou (2015/0253256) in view of CN 110383040. Claim 1, 18 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses a method or apparatus for inspecting a three-dimensional shape an optical system (Fig. 3A, Ref. 30; optical; assembly) configured to refract respective modulated light beams at different refractive indices for each of multiple wavelengths based on chromatic aberration (Para. 0030), thereby forming a measurement section in a vertical direction in which the light refracted for each wavelength is focused (See Fig. 3A, Ref. λ1, λ2 being focused); a beam splitter (Fig. 4B, Ref. 50) configured to transmit a part of light reflected from the measurement object (Fig. 3A, Ref. 22, wafer) and to reflect another part of the light reflected from the measurement object (Fig. 3A, Ref. 22); a first detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 49) configured to detect information on a wavelength of the light transmitted through the beam splitter (Fig. 4B, Ref. 50); and a second detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 48) configured to detect information on a wavelength of the light reflected by the beam splitter (Fig. 4B, Ref. 50), wherein a filter detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 51, 52), which is one of the first detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 49) and the second detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 48), comprises a filter unit (Fig. 4B, Ref. 51, 52) configured to block light at a specific wavelength or longer, thereby detecting information on light of a wavelength less than the specific wavelength (Para. 0040). PNG media_image1.png 552 354 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 274 299 media_image2.png Greyscale Zhou (2015/0253256) substantially teaches the claimed invention except that it does not show a light emitter including a light source and a spatial light modulator configured to modulate light received from the light source, the light emitter being configured to emit multiple light beams having multiple focal points downward onto a surface of a measurement object. CN 110383040 shows that it is known to provide a light emitter (Fig. 1, Ref. 30) including a light source (Fig. 1, Ref. 2) and a spatial light modulator (Fig. 1, Ref. 12; first spatial light modulator) configured to modulate light received from the light source (Fig. 1, Ref. 2), the light emitter (Fig. 1, Ref. 30) being configured to emit multiple light beams having multiple focal points (Fig. 1, Ref. D1-Dn) downward onto a surface of a measurement object (Fig. 1, Ref. 5) for an optical system for measuring a target object. It would have been obvious to modify the device of Zhou (2015/0253256) with the light emitter of CN 110383040 before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the purpose of providing multiple light beams, each focused at different points on a measurement object’s surface, therefore providing non-contact, high speed scanning by simultaneous multi-focal illumination. PNG media_image3.png 543 520 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim 2 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses a controller (Para. 0026; processor) configured to measure a height (Para. 0029; height information) of a base (See Fig. 3A, Ref. λ2) of the measurement object (Fig. 3A, Ref. 22) and a height of a transparent material (Fig. 3A, Ref. λ1) disposed on the base based on information detected by the first detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 49) and information detected by the second detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 48). Claim 3 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses the filter detector is configured to detect light intensity information (Para. 0040; detects intensity at wavelength provided). Claim 14 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses the filter detector is the second detector (See Fig. 4B, Ref. 51, filter, Ref. 48, camera). Claim 15 Zhou (2015/0253256) substantially teaches the claimed invention except that it does not show the spatial light modulator is configured to modulate light received from the light source by reflecting the light, and comprises multiple digital micromirror devices arranged in an array. CN 110383040 shows that it is known to provide the spatial light modulator is configured to modulate light received from the light source by reflecting the light, and comprises multiple digital micromirror devices arranged in an array (Page 4 of translation “plurality of micromirrors”) for a optical device measuring a surface of an object. It would have been obvious to modify the device of Zhou (2015/0253256) with the micromirror array of CN 110383040 before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the purpose of providing fast, programmable light control, high spatial resolution, and flexible optical path shaping, therefore providing accurate and efficient 3D reconstruction. Claim 16 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses the first detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 49) and the second detector (Fig. 4B, Ref. 48) are configured to detect color information of a light beam focused at and reflected from a position corresponding to a height of the base of the measurement object (Fig. 3A, Ref. 22) or a height of the transparent material disposed on the base among the light beams refracted for each wavelength (See Fig. 3A, Ref. λ1, λ2; Para. 0031, color parsing, spectrometry). Claim 17 Zhou (2015/0253256) discloses the light emitter (Fig. 3A, Ref. 26) is configured to emit the multiple light beams having multiple focal points downward onto the surface of the measurement object (Fig. 3A, Ref. 22) in a horizontal direction perpendicular to the vertical direction (See Fig. 3A, focal points for λ1 and λ2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-13, 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claims 4, 6, 8, the prior art fails to disclose or make obvious a focus adjuster configured to change the measurement section by vertically changing the positions where the light beams refracted for each wavelength are focused; and a controller configured to control the focus adjuster to change the measurement section when the determining the light intensity information to be equal to or less than a predetermined first specific intensity; a focus adjuster configured to change the measurement section by vertically changing the positions where the light beams refracted for each wavelength are focused; and a controller configured to control the focus adjuster to change the measurement section when determining the light intensity information to be equal to or greater than a predetermined second specific intensity; a focus adjuster configured to change the measurement section by vertically changing the positions where the light beams refracted for each wavelength are focused; and a controller configured to control the focus adjuster to change the measurement section when the light intensity information satisfies a predetermined criterion, wherein the first detector and the second detector are configured to detect information on the wavelength of light again in a state in which the measurement section is changed, and in combination with the other recited limitations of claims 1, 3. Claims 5, 7, 9-13 would be allowable by the virtue of dependency on the allowable subject matter of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8. Regarding claims 19, 20, the prior art fails to disclose or make obvious a focus adjustment step of changing the measurement section by vertically changing the positions where the light beams refracted for each wavelength are focused when it is determined that the light intensity information is equal to or less than a predetermined first specific intensity or equal to or greater than a predetermined second specific intensity; a focus adjustment step of changing the measurement section by vertically changing the positions where the light beams refracted for each wavelength are focused when the light intensity information satisfies a predetermined criterion, and wherein the first detection step and the second detection step are performed again in a state in which the measurement section is changed, and in combination with the other recited limitations of claim 18. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL PATRICK STAFIRA whose telephone number is (571)272-2430. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tarifur Chowdhury can be reached at 571-272-2287. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL P STAFIRA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877 September 23, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768641
COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINE, LIGHT SOURCE AND METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768645
GENERATION OF ONE OR MORE EDGES OF LUMINOSITY TO FORM THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS OF SCENES
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763544
MODE-MATCHING A PLURALITY OF OPTICAL BEAMS TO A CORRESPONDING PLURALITY OF OPTICAL POWER AMPLIFIERS
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754126
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING KEY DIMENSION OF LOW-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS BY OPTICAL SCATTERING
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748072
LASER ILLUMINATION TECHNIQUES FOR CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.0%)
1y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month