Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/116,459

Orientation Adjustment Apparatus

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — JP 2022-158630 +1 more
Examiner
SINGH, KAVEL
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Daifuku Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1112 granted / 1328 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1366
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1328 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the first conveyor section" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the second conveyor section" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, and 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Komatsu Kazuhiro JP 2006327758 A. Claim 1, Komatsu Kazuhiro teaches an orientation adjustment apparatus Fig. 1 that adjusts an orientation of a conveyance target W Abstract, the orientation adjustment apparatus Fig. 1 comprising: an orientation adjustment conveyor 1 configured to adjust the orientation of the conveyance target W while conveying the conveyance target W along a conveyance direction A1; a characteristic determination device 4 configured to determine at least one characteristic of the conveyance target W on an upstream side B with respect to the orientation adjustment conveyor 1 P0026; an upstream orientation detection device 4 configured to detect the orientation of the conveyance target W at an upstream end portion B of the orientation adjustment conveyor 1 P0027; and a control device 5 configured to control the orientation adjustment conveyor 1 P0026, and wherein: the orientation adjustment conveyor 1 comprises a first conveyor part 1 and a second conveyor part 1’ Fig. 1 that are disposed in parallel to be adjacent to each other in a conveyance width direction and is configured to cause the first conveyor part 1 and the second conveyor part 1’ to have respective conveyance speeds different from each other via A2, the conveyance width direction being a direction orthogonal to the conveyance direction, the control device 5 is configured to perform orientation adjustment control via A2 for controlling a speed difference between the respective conveyance speeds of the first conveyor part 1 and the second conveyor part 1’ to change the orientation of the conveyance target W that is conveyed in a state of being placed on both of the first conveyor part 1 and the second conveyor part 1’, the conveyance target W has an intended orientation as an orientation intended at a downstream end portion of the orientation adjustment conveyor Fig. 1 and an upstream actual orientation via 4 as an actual orientation that the upstream orientation detection device 4 has detected, changing the speed difference via A2, 5, 6, 6’ in accordance with a degree of a pre-adjustment orientation difference as a difference between the upstream actual orientation via 4 at B and the intended orientation and increasing the speed difference with an increase in a characteristic value indicative of a degree of difficulty of an orientation change which difficulty corresponds to the at least one characteristic of the conveyance target W determined by the characteristic determination device via 5 P0026; 0034. Claim 3, Komatsu Kazuhiro teaches a during-conveyance orientation detection device 4 configured to detect the orientation of the conveyance target W over an entire region of the orientation adjustment conveyor 1,1’, wherein the speed difference via A2 has an initial speed difference based on the pre-adjustment orientation difference and the characteristic value, wherein the conveyance target W has a during-conveyance actual orientation as an actual orientation that the during-conveyance orientation detection device 4 has detected, and wherein the control device 5 is configured to determine the initial speed difference and then, while the orientation adjustment conveyor 1,1’ is conveying the conveyance target W, change the speed difference in accordance with a degree of a during-conveyance orientation difference as a difference between the during-conveyance actual orientation and the intended orientation and change the speed difference as needed to increase the speed difference with an increase in the characteristic value P0027-0032. Claim 5, Komatsu Kazuhiro teaches the characteristic value increases continuously or stepwise with a larger weight of the conveyance target W P0029. Claim 6, Komatsu Kazuhiro teaches the characteristic value increases continuously or stepwise with a smaller area via 4 of the conveyance target W in a plan view P0027-0032. Claim 7, Komatsu Kazuhiro teaches the first conveyor section 1 is disposed on a first conveyance width direction side relative to the second conveyor section 1’ in the conveyance width direction Fig. 1, the first conveyance width direction side being opposite to a second conveyance width direction side, the first conveyor part 1 is a roller conveyor comprising a plurality of first rollers arranged in the conveyance direction, each of the first rollers has a rotation axis inclined downstream in the conveyance direction on the first conveyance width direction side, and the second conveyor part 1’ is a roller conveyor comprising a plurality of second rollers arranged in the conveyance direction and each of the second rollers has a rotation axis inclined downstream in the conveyance direction on the second conveyance width direction side Fig. 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEL SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2362. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEL SINGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 KS
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768272
CONTINUOUS ACTUATOR DRIVEN MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM FOR VERTICAL AND INCLINED SHAFTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759845
HANDRAIL FOR A PASSENGER TRANSPORT SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753025
Product Engagement Assembly, Related Systems And Methods
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12722901
CONVEYOR COMPONENT WITH FLEXIBLE HUB AND CONVEYOR ASSEMBLY
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723623
BEARING POSITIONING STRUCTURE WITHOUT RADIAL INTERFERENCE FIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month