Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/116,762

UPLINK TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION METHOD IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DEVICE THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Priority
Sep 29, 2022 — provisional 63/411,591 +1 more
Examiner
PUENTE, EVA YI ZHENG
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
720 granted / 802 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
817
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 802 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: on line 10, please add -- on -- before “the configuration”. Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: on line 16, please add -- on -- before “the configuration”. Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: on line 16, please add -- on -- before “the configuration”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 16 and 20, recitation: “wherein a transmission scheme related to the PUSCH is configured as a codebook based transmission or a non-codebook based transmission based the configuration information” is unclear and confusing. It is unclear what “the configuration information” it refers to. Is it the configuration information related to SRS, PUSCH or something else? Therefore, the claims are indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu et al (US 2025/0211391). a) Regarding claim 1, Liu et al disclose a method comprising: receiving configuration information related to a sounding reference signal (SRS) (702 in Fig. 7), wherein two SRS resource sets are configured based on the configuration information related to the SRS, and a usage of each of the two SRS resource sets is configured as a codebook or a non-codebook (Pub [0130]; Table 2); receiving configuration information related to a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) (704 in Fig. 7; Pub [0130]; CG configuration), wherein a transmission scheme related to the PUSCH is configured as a codebook based transmission or a non-codebook based transmission based the configuration information (702 and 704); receiving downlink control information (DCI) for scheduling the PUSCH (Pub [0130]), wherein the DCI includes at least one of i) an SRS resource set indicator field, ii) a first SRS resource indicator (SRI) field, and/or iii) a second SRS resource indicator (SRI) field (Pub [0130]); and transmitting the PUSCH based on the DCI, wherein a number of layers related to the PUSCH is larger than 4 (Pub [0007]), wherein the PUSCH is transmitted based on antenna ports (Pub [0104]), wherein the antenna ports are based on SRS ports related to one or more SRS resources indicated based on the DCI (Fig. 3; Pub [0104]), and wherein the antenna ports are determined based on i) at least one of eight first SRS ports related to a first SRS resource set and/or ii) at least one of eight second SRS ports related to a second SRS resource set (Pub [0091-0092]). b) Regarding claim 16, Liu et al disclose a user equipment (UE) comprising: one or more transceivers (UE shown in Fig. 9); one or more processors (Fig. 9); and one or more memories operably connectable to the one or more processors, and storing instructions of configuring the one or more processors to perform operations based on being executed by the one or more processors (Fig. 9), wherein the operations include receiving configuration information related to a sounding reference signal (SRS) (702 in Fig. 7), wherein two SRS resource sets are configured based on the configuration information related to the SRS, and a usage of each of the two SRS resource sets is configured as a codebook or a non-codebook (Pub [0130]; Table 2); receiving configuration information related to a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) (704 in Fig. 7; Pub [0130]; CG configuration), wherein a transmission scheme related to the PUSCH is configured as a codebook based transmission or a non-codebook based transmission based the configuration information (702 and 704); receiving downlink control information (DCI) for scheduling the PUSCH (Pub [0130]), wherein the DCI includes at least one of i) an SRS resource set indicator field, ii) a first SRS resource indicator (SRI) field, and/or iii) a second SRS resource indicator (SRI) field (Pub [0130]); and transmitting the PUSCH based on the DCI, wherein a number of layers related to the PUSCH is larger than 4 (Pub [0007]), wherein the PUSCH is transmitted based on antenna ports (Pub [0104]), wherein the antenna ports are based on SRS ports related to one or more SRS resources indicated based on the DCI (Fig. 3; Pub [0104]), and wherein the antenna ports are determined based on i) at least one of eight first SRS ports related to a first SRS resource set and/or ii) at least one of eight second SRS ports related to a second SRS resource set (Pub [0091-0092]). c) Regarding claim 20, Liu et al disclose a base station comprising: one or more transceivers (gNB shown in Fig. 9); one or more processors (Fig. 9); and one or more memories operably connectable to the one or more processors, and storing instructions of configuring the one or more processors to perform operations based on being executed by the one or more processors (Fig. 9), wherein the operations include transmitting configuration information related to a sounding reference signal (SRS) (802 in Fig. 8), wherein two SRS resource sets are configured based on the configuration information related to the SRS, and a usage of each of the two SRS resource sets is configured as a codebook or a non-codebook (Pub [0138-0139]; Table 2); transmitting configuration information related to a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) (804 in Fig. 8; Pub [0138]; CG configuration), wherein a transmission scheme related to the PUSCH is configured as a codebook based transmission or a non-codebook based transmission based the configuration information (802 and 804); transmitting downlink control information (DCI) for scheduling the PUSCH (Pub [0138-0139]), wherein the DCI includes at least one of i) an SRS resource set indicator field, ii) a first SRS resource indicator (SRI) field, and/or iii) a second SRS resource indicator (SRI) field (Pub [0138]); and receiving the PUSCH based on the DCI, wherein a number of layers related to the PUSCH is larger than 4 (Pub [0007]), wherein the PUSCH is received based on antenna ports (Pub [0104]), wherein the antenna ports are based on SRS ports related to one or more SRS resources indicated based on the DCI (Fig. 3; Pub [0104]), and wherein the antenna ports are determined based on i) at least one of eight first SRS ports related to a first SRS resource set and/or ii) at least one of eight second SRS ports related to a second SRS resource set (Pub [0091-0092]). d) Regarding claim 2, Liu et al disclose wherein based on a value of the SRS resource set indicator field being 0 or 1: the one or more SRS resources are indicated based on the first SRI field, and the one or more SRS resources are related to the first SRS resource set or the second SRS resource set (Table 2 and 3). e) Regarding claim 3, Liu et al disclose wherein a maximum number of bits of the first SRI field is 8, and a number of bits of the second SRI field is 0 (Table 2 and 3). f) Regarding claim 5, Liu et al disclose wherein the PUSCH is related to a single transmission and reception point (TRP) (Pub [0112]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2026/0059532 Ma et al disclose precoding on PUSCH transmission. US 2024/0056258 Sun et al disclose eight transmit uplinking. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Eva Y Puente whose telephone number is 571-272-3049. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached on 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). September 16, 2026 /EVA Y PUENTE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763819
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPLINK SIGNAL PRECODING AND REPORTING
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763825
ERROR VECTOR MAGNITUDE FOR TRANSMIT DIVERSITY
1y 12m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756602
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR PERFORMING LINK EQUALIZATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756515
METHODS AND APPARATUSES TO FACILITATE LARGER NUMBER OF DMRS PORTS
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750094
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 802 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month