Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/117,416

Styptic harness tourniquet

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 01, 2025
Examiner
KHANDKER, RAIHAN R
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
100 granted / 157 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +60% interview lift
Without
With
+60.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
218
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 157 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 10 contains the trademark/trade name Velcro. Where a trademark or trade name is used in a claim as a limitation to identify or describe a particular material or product, the claim does not comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph. See Ex parte Simpson, 218 USPQ 1020 (Bd. App. 1982). The claim scope is uncertain since the trademark or trade name cannot be used properly to identify any particular material or product. A trademark or trade name is used to identify a source of goods, and not the goods themselves. Thus, a trademark or trade name does not identify or describe the goods associated with the trademark or trade name. In the present case, the trademark/trade name is used to identify/describe hook and loop fasteners and, accordingly, the identification/description is indefinite. Claims 2-9 are rejected as being dependent on claim 1. Claim 10 recite “there are limiters” in line 1. This limitation renders the claim indefinite as it is not clear if these refer to the “at least two limiters” in claim 1 or different ones. For the purpose of prior art examination this limitation will be interpreted as “the at least two limiters”. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. McDonald et al (US 20120071917 A1) discloses a styptic harness torniquet with at least one strengthening element added and connected to the sling, but as independent claim 1 is limited with “consists of” also teaches a trap and pin, that is excluded from the claim, hence currently not reading on the claim Peterson et al (US 20210153873 A1) teaches a styptic harness torniquet with two protectors located in the casing on both sides of the base but does not teach the base having at least 6 holes Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAIHAN R KHANDKER whose telephone number is (571)272-6174. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:00 PM - 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 571-272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RAIHAN R. KHANDKER Examiner Art Unit 3771 /RAIHAN R KHANDKER/Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582555
Systems and Methods of Performing Transcanal Ear Surgery
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12533138
OCCLUSIVE MATERIAL FOR MEDICAL DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12533152
METHODS OF RECIPROCATION IN A SURGICAL SHAVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12521523
CATHETER SYSTEMS FOR APPLYING EFFECTIVE SUCTION IN REMOTE VESSELS AND THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURES FACILITATED BY CATHETER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12514589
DEVICE FOR VASCULAR OCCLUSION AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+60.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month