Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/117,794

Cassette Connecting Device for Automatic Teller Machine

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 02, 2025
Priority
Oct 05, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0126723 +1 more
Examiner
SEVERSON, JEREMY R
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hyosung Tns Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
863 granted / 984 resolved
+35.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 984 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “power transmission unit” in claims 1 and 9. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Park (US 12,033,476). The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216. Regarding claim 1, Park discloses a cassette connecting device for an automated teller machine, which is to be installed in a replenishment access section and to which a replenishment cassette is to be connected, the cassette connecting device comprising: a body 110 installed in the replenishment access section and providing a receiving space into which the replenishment cassette 10 is to be inserted; a handle frame 160 rotatably connected to the body to open and close the receiving space; a connection connector 130 installed in the body and electrically connectable with a cassette connector of the replenishment cassette when the replenishment cassette is inserted into the receiving space; and a power transmission unit 180 connecting the handle frame and the connection connector so that the handle frame and the connection connector are interlocked, wherein the power transmission unit rotates the connection connector to a point corresponding to the cassette connector when the handle frame is rotated to open the receiving space. See col. 11, lines 20-41. Regarding claim 2, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 1, wherein the power transmission unit 180 rotates the connection connector 130 in one direction so that the connection connector is exposed from the body when the handle frame 160 is rotated in a direction to open the receiving space, and rotates the connection connector in the other direction so that the connection connector is not exposed from the body when the handle frame is rotated in a direction to close the receiving space. See col. 12, lines 10-45. Regarding claim 3, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 2, wherein the power transmission unit 180 includes: a rotating bracket 131 rotatably installed on the body 110, to which the connection connector 130 is mounted; a first gear 184 rotatably installed on the body, which rotates in one direction when pushed by the rotation of the handle frame 160; a second gear 185 rotatably installed on the body to mesh with at least a portion of the first gear, which rotates in the other direction when the first gear is rotated in the one direction; and a third gear 186 rotatably installed on the body to mesh with at least a portion of the second gear, which rotates the rotating bracket in the one direction when the second gear is rotated in the other direction. See col. 12, lines 34-45. Regarding claim 4, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 3, wherein the power transmission unit 180 further includes a return spring 183 elastically connected between a fixed bracket 181 of the body 110 and the rotating bracket 131 to return the third gear 186 to an initial position thereof when the push of the handle frame 160 against the first gear is released. See col. 11, lines 52-63. Regarding claim 5, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 1, wherein the body 110 includes: a support frame 110; a rotation shaft 124 provided at a lower portion of the support frame, to which the handle frame 160 is rotatably connected; a moving shaft 121 provided at an upper portion of the support frame to be movable in a front-rear direction of the support frame; and a support plate 120 having a lower portion rotatably connected to the rotation shaft and an upper portion rotatably connected to the moving shaft. Regarding claim 6, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 5, wherein the body further includes: a guide frame 170 that hinge-connects between both sides of the support plate 120 and both sides of the handle frame 160; and a guide pin 172 that is coupled to both sides of the support plate, and wherein the guide frame includes: a guide rod portion having one end portion hinge-connected to an upper portion of the handle frame; and a guide slit portion formed to extend at the other end portion of the guide rod portion so that the guide pin is guided in a length direction of the guide rod portion. See fig. below. PNG media_image1.png 601 380 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 5, wherein the support frame 110 includes: a support frame portion; and a support hole portion formed to extend in the front-rear direction in a sidewall of the support frame portion to provide a movement path of the moving shaft. See fig. below. PNG media_image2.png 433 383 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, Park discloses a cassette connecting device for an automated teller machine, which is to be installed in a replenishment access section and to which a replenishment cassette is to be connected, the cassette connecting device comprising: a body 110 installed in the replenishment access section and providing a receiving space into which the replenishment cassette is to be inserted; and a connection connector 130 movably arranged on the body to be electrically connected to a cassette connector of the replenishment cassette, wherein the connection connector is arranged at a preset first point of the body before the replenishment cassette is inserted into the receiving space, and is arranged at a second point corresponding to the cassette connector when the replenishment cassette is inserted into the receiving space. See col. 11, lines 20-41. Regarding claim 9, Park discloses the cassette connecting device of claim 8, further comprising: a handle frame 160 rotatably connected to the body to open and close the receiving space; and a power transmission unit 180 configured to move the connection connector in the body in conjunction with the rotation of the handle frame. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Jeong (US 9,499,359) discloses a cassette mounting unit in a cash recycler. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jeremy R. Severson, whose telephone number is (571)272-2209. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes, can be reached at (571) 272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEREMY R SEVERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 02, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766805
Blank Turning Assembly, Related Systems And Methods
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753036
MEDIUM CONVEYANCE DEVICE AND IMAGE READING DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741842
PAPER SHEET STORAGE DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729086
PAPER FEEDING DEVICE, PAPER FEEDING METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722922
PAPER FEED ROLL
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 984 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month