Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/120,003

AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE SEAL APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Priority
Oct 17, 2022 — EU 22201955.6 +1 more
Examiner
BROCKMAN, ELDON T
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
J B Roche (Mfg) Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 697 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
713
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 697 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the claims filed 4/10/2025. Claims 1-2, 4-7, 9, 11, 13-14, 16, 18-19, and 21-27 are presented for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/10/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 6, 13, 14, 18, 21-24, and 27 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as failing to set forth the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the structure" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the door" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "an engine intake" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 14 recites the limitation "an engine intake" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "an engine intake" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 21-24 each recite “the hatch liner” without proper antecedent basis. The examiner suggests changing dependence of these claims so that they depend upon claim 2. Claim 27 recites the limitation "an access hatch" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For sake of examination, the recitation of an access hatch in claim 27 was assumed to be the same access hatch established in claim 25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kriegl et al. in DE102019212436 (hereinafter “Kriegl”). Regarding claim 1, Kriegl discloses discloses an aircraft engine seal apparatus 10 (Fig. 1-4) comprising an inflatable seal 20 with a front wall 12.1, a rear wall 12.2, and a side wall 12.3 forming a rim for pressing and sealing against an internal surface of an engine intake (paragraph [0029]), and an inflation port 28 (Fig. 4; paragraph [0031]-[0033]), wherein the apparatus further comprises at least one access hatch 42 (note: 42 is disclosed as a filter, but it could function as an access hatch) which is openable to allow access into a cavity behind the seal in use (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 25, Kriegl discloses a method of sealing an aircraft engine when not in use, the method being performed with a seal apparatus comprising: an inflatable seal 20 with a front wall 12.1, a rear wall 12.2, and a side wall 12.3 forming a rim for pressing and sealing against an internal surface of an engine intake, and an inflation port 28 (Fig. 4; paragraph [0031]-[0033]), wherein the apparatus further comprises at least one access hatch 42 (disclosed as a filter, but could function as an access hatch) which is openable to allow access into a cavity behind the seal in use; wherein the method comprises a step of inflating a seal of the seal apparatus until the rim 12.3 engages and seals against an internal surface of an engine intake of the aircraft engine (Fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. Claims 2, 4-7, 9, 11, 13-14, 16, 18-19, 21-24, and 26-27 would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims and overcoming any objections or 112 rejections seen above. Regarding claims 2, 4-7, 9, 11, 13-14, 16, 18-19, 21-24, and 26-27, each of these claims recites further engine seal structure neither anticipated nor reasonably suggested in combination by the art of record. Various limitations by themselves are demonstrated by the art, such as employing desiccants on engine covers to absorb moisture (see US2015/0089879), and using blowers for drying/cleaning engine structure in combination with engine covers. The prior art of record demonstrates various different embodiments of inflatable plugs or covers for gas turbine engine inlets. None of the art of record, however, discloses a structure having each and every limitation required of these claims; further, none of the art of record provides sufficient motivation to combine different features to arrive a device that would render any of these claims obvious. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US2014/0008497 discloses a gas turbine engine cover with desiccant attached to the cover. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELDON T BROCKMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3263. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Court Heinle can be reached at (571) 270-3508. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELDON T BROCKMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 10, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631115
DUAL TIP FLAG
1y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624642
LOW-PRESSURE TURBINE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618412
PUMP FOR IMMERSION WITHIN A FLUID RESERVOIR
1y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618333
VARIABLE FLOWPATH CASINGS FOR BLADE TIP CLEARANCE CONTROL
1y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600433
TENDER WITH HYBRID CATAMARAN HULL CONFIGURATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month