Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/121,994

Transmission Device for a Motor Vehicle, and Motor Vehicle, in Particular Motor Car

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Priority
Oct 31, 2022 — DE 10 2022 004 088.3 +1 more
Examiner
LEWIS, TISHA D
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1093 granted / 1247 resolved
+35.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1307
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1247 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The following is a first action on the merits of application serial no. 19/121994 filed 4/17/2025. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 4/17/25 has been considered. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: -Paragraph [0069] describes “In Fig. 3, a dashed arrow 74 means “meshes with”…… However, the arrow 74 is currently shown in Figure 7, not Figure 3 as described. -Paragraph [0077] on page 37, line 3 describes “the sun gears 14 and 26”, however the reference character “26” should be changed to “16” as described and shown in drawings. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 16-24, 27 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. -Claims 16, 17, 20 and 24 recite the limitation “a first toothing module and a second toothing module”. It is unclear as to what the term “module” is referring to, (i.e., gear body, gear toothing arrangement, etc.), please clarify. -Claims 19, 20, 22 and 23 seem to be switching between reciting the first and second differential planetary gears and the first and second staged planets. Although claim 15 recites that the first and second differential planetary gears are considered the first and second staged planets, scope of consistency should be maintained when reciting these gears throughout the claims to promote clarity. The examiner suggest applicant choose between reciting the gears as the first and second differential planetary gears or the first and second staged planets in the above claims (recommend changing claims 19 and 23 to the first and second differential planetary gears recitations). -Claim 27 recites the limitations “wherein in a direction running in an axial direction of the second differential planetary gear, the second differential planetary gear adjoins the ring gear, adjoins the first planetary gear and adjoins the second planetary gear of the planetary transmission, wherein the ring gear and the second planetary gear adjoin the first planetary gear in the direction, and wherein the ring gear and the second planetary gear are arranged between the second differential planetary gear of the spur gear differential and the first planetary gear of the planetary transmission, as viewed in the axial direction of the second differential planetary gear.” It is unclear as to what the term “adjoin or adjoins” is referring to (i.e., is it referring to the torque transmitting between gears from input to output), please clarify and/or amend accordingly. -Claim 28 recites the limitations “wherein the first rolling circle diameter of the first sun gear is larger than the second rolling circle diameter of the second sun gear which adjoins the first sun gear in an arrangement direction running in an axial direction of the first sun gear and the second sun gear, wherein the first sun gear adjoins the third sun gear in the arrangement direction, and wherein the first sun gear is arranged between the second sun gear and the third sun gear, as viewed in the axial direction of the first sun gear and the second sun gear. It is unclear as to what the term “adjoin or adjoins” is referring to (i.e., is it referring to the torque transmitting between gears from input to output), please clarify and/or amend accordingly. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-28 are allowed (via prior art purposes only). The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art of record doesn’t disclose or render obvious a motivation to provide for: -a transmission device for a motor vehicle having a spur gear differential with a first sun gear having a first rolling circle diameter; a second sun gear having a second rolling circle diameter different from the first diameter; a planetary gear set coupled to the first and second sun gears and having a planetary carrier, a first differential planetary gear engaging the first sun gear and having a third rolling circle diameter, a second differential planetary gear engaging the second sun gear and a coupling planetary gear arranged coaxially to the first planetary gear and having a fourth rolling circle diameter different from the third diameter wherein a first ratio between the first and second diameters and a second ratio between the third and fourth diameters are identical and in combination with the limitations exactly as written in claim 15. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -The PCT/EP2023/080012 written opinion as filed has been reviewed and the examiner agrees that the prior art cited doesn’t meet the limitations pertaining to a first ratio between the first and second diameters and a second ratio between the third and fourth diameters are identical. -Edler 20140315677 ([0048]); Nett et al 20080153652 ([0028], [0054]) and DE 102014211141 (page 9 in machine translation) all disclose spur gear type differentials and shows that it is well known in the art to use pitch or rolling circle diameters for gear design. At least Nett and DE disclose values that can be used to determine ratios, however, none show that the ratios would be identical as recited. -Biermann et al discloses a spur gear differential and shows that it is well known in the art to determine tip diameter, but not as disclosed in Figures 11 and 12 of present invention ([0033]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TISHA D LEWIS whose telephone number is (571)272-7093. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 8:30am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna M Momper can be reached at 571-270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdl /TISHA D LEWIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619 September 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768442
CONTROL MODE SWITCHING APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759644
VEHICLE BODY FLOOR ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE AND VEHICLE CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12741649
VEHICLE TOWING DRIVING CONTROL METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736023
HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND ENGINE START-STOP CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728762
HYBRID VEHICLE CHARGING INCLUDING DURING STANDSTILL OR NEUTRAL GEAR OPERATING STATES
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1247 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month