Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/122,861

PRESSURE ACTIVATED NON-CONTACT SEALS AND SEAL ASSEMBLIES

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 21, 2025
Priority
Oct 21, 2022 — GB 2215665.7 +1 more
Examiner
CUMAR, NATHAN
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cross Manufacturing Company (1938) Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
951 granted / 1209 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1209 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the ends of the seal walls" in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim(s) that depend(s) from the rejected claim(s) 2-19 is/are rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by D1 (Bidkar et al., US Pub. 2016-0010480). For claim 1, D1 discloses, in Figures 1-13, a pressure activated non-contact seal (Shoe plate 14 rides on film above rotor shaft. Para. [0026]. Figures 6 and 9) for sealing against a rotating cylindrical surface (surface of rotating rotor 25, 92, 142) between a high-pressure region (20) and a low-pressure region (22, para. [0026]), comprising: a seal member carrier (28) spaced radially from the rotating cylindrical surface and defining a seal member chamber (Space between 28 and 102) in fluid communication with the high-pressure region (20); a seal member (102) supported by the seal member carrier (28) so as to be moveable in a radial direction of the rotating cylindrical surface (Since a bellow spring 24 is disposed between 28 and 102, during operation bellow spring 24 allows radial movement for seal 102), and comprising non-contact seal surfaces adjacent to the rotating cylindrical surface (Figures 8-9); and a secondary seal (includes 24,106) mounted between a surface of the seal member (102) facing the seal member carrier (28) and an opposed surface of the seal member chamber to provide a pressure barrier around the seal member (102) between the high-pressure region (20) and the low-pressure region (22, Figures 6 and 9); wherein: the seal member (102) comprises side walls (15, 18, 50) extending in the radial direction towards the rotating cylindrical surface and defining a seal cavity (Space between 15 and 18), the ends of the side walls adjacent to the rotating cylindrical surface defining non-contact seal surfaces (Shoe plate 14 rides on film above rotor shaft. Para. [0026]); and the seal member (102) further comprises a bleed port (30) extending between the seal cavity (space between 15 and 18) and the seal member chamber (space between 28 and 102) on the high-pressure side (20) of the secondary seal (106) such that in use, high pressure in the seal member chamber urges the seal member towards the rotating cylindrical surface until balanced by the pressure in the seal cavity to maintain the non- contact seal surfaces in a non-contact sealing relationship with the rotating cylindrical surface (Figures 6 shows the surfaces subjected to different pressure until the seal assembly is balanced during operation.) For claim 2, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rotating cylindrical surface is the outer surface of a rotating shaft or cylinder, or the inner surface of a rotating cylinder (Figures 8, 11, and 13.) For claim 3, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the seal member side walls are located at opposite ends of the seal member, and one or more intermediate walls are located between the side walls to define multiple seal cavities (Seal assembly 10 has multiple assemblies. Figures 1 and 9.) For claim 4, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 3, further comprising a bleed port (30) extending between each seal cavity and the seal member chamber around the seal member on the high-pressure side (20) of the secondary seal (106, Figure 9) For claim 5, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the secondary seal (106) is mounted on the seal member and is urged against the opposed wall of the seal member chamber (Figure 9.) For claim 6, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the secondary seal (106) is mounted on the opposed wall of the seal member chamber and is urged against the surface of the seal member facing the seal member carrier (Figure 9.) For claim 7, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the secondary seal (106) is located at a position between the high-pressure end and the-low pressure end of the seal member (Figure 6.) For claim 8, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the surface of the seal member facing the seal member carrier (28) is extended in a radial direction (104) to define an axially-facing surface portion (radial surface on either side of 104), the opposed surface of the seal member chamber has a corresponding axially-facing surface portion, and the secondary seal (106) is mounted between the two axially-facing surface portions. (Figure9.) For claim 9, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the seal member carrier (28) comprises an end wall (108) located at the low-pressure (22) end of the seal member carrier and extending towards the shaft such that the low-pressure end of the seal member (radial wall of 104) abuts against the end wall (via 106, Figure 9.) For claim 10, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 9, wherein the end wall has a pocket (space above 106) formed facing the low-pressure end of the seal member carrier, wherein the pocket is in pressure communication with the seal member chamber outside the seal member on the high- pressure side of the secondary seal (Figure 9.) For claim 11, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 10, wherein there is a pressure port (gap in 24) extending between the pocket (space above 106) and the seal member chamber around the seal member on the high- pressure side of the secondary seal, or between the pocket and a seal cavity having a bleed port (30) extending to the seal member chamber around the seal member on the high-pressure side of the secondary seal (Figure 6 and 9.) For claim 12, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 9, wherein the seal member carrier end wall (on either side of 106) and the low-pressure end of the seal member (17) are axially spaced from the non-contact seal surfaces (15, 18; Figure 9.) For claim 15, D1 discloses a seal assembly comprising multiple seals as claimed in claim 1 arranged circumferentially around the rotating cylindrical surface (Figure 1.) For claim 16, D1 discloses the seal assembly as claimed in claim 15, further comprising a seal carrier (28), wherein each seal comprises a formation that engages with a corresponding formation on the seal carrier to resist rotational movement of the seal (Figures 1 and 3.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 (Bidkar et al., US Pub. 2016-0010480) in view of D2 (Grover et al., US Pub. 2021-0301925). For claim 13, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the seal member carrier (28) comprises an end wall located at the high-pressure end of the seal member carrier and extending towards the rotating cylindrical surface (Figure 9), and a leaf spring extends between the end wall and the high-pressure end of the seal member. D1 does not disclose a leaf spring. D2 teaches, in Figures 1-2 and 4, a non-contact seal with leaf spring (spring beams 118a, 118b. para. [0068]) for effective sealing. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify D1 with a leaf spring such that the leaf spring extends between the end wall and the high-pressure end of the seal member, as taught by D2 with a reasonable expectation of success of having an effective sealing. For claim 14, D1 discloses the seal as claimed in claim 13, but does not disclose wherein the leaf spring comprises a pair of leaf springs spaced apart in a radial direction. D2 teaches, in Figures 1-2 and 4, a seal a non-contact seal with leaf spring (spring beams 118a, 118b. para. [0068]) for effective sealing. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify D1 with a pair leaf spring spaced apart in a radial direction, as taught by D2 with a reasonable expectation of success of having an effective sealing. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 (Bidkar et al., US Pub. 2016-0010480) in view of D3 (Fuller, US Pub. 2003-0094762). For claim 17, D1 discloses the seal assembly as claimed in claim 15, but does not disclose further comprising springs between adjacent seals arranged to urge the adjacent seals apart. D3 teaches a segmented labyrinth seal assembly with spring 40 between two adjacent seal segments urging the segments apart to maintain fluid film in the labyrinth seal. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify D1 with springs such that the springs between adjacent seals arranged to urge the adjacent seals apart, as taught by D3 with a reasonable expectation of success of providing an effective labyrinth seal. Claim(s) 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 (Bidkar et al., US Pub. 2016-0010480) in view of D4 (Brandon et al., US 5,934,684). For claim 18, D1 discloses the seal assembly as claimed in claim 15, but does not disclose wherein the edges of adjacent seals are stepped, and the stepped edges are inter-engaged to prevent a direct path extending between adjacent seals. D4 teaches a seal assembly with segmented seal ring 113 having stepped ends to engage with each other (Figure 6) for secured arrangement. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify D1 such the edges of adjacent seals are stepped, and the stepped edges are inter-engaged to prevent a direct path extending between adjacent seals, as taught by D2 with a reasonable expectation of success of having a secured arrangement. For claim 19, the combination teaches the seal assembly as claimed in claim 18, wherein the steps are in the radial and/or axial directions (D4 teaches the seal segments have edges with steps, Figure 6. D1 modified with D4 teaches the claimed limitations.) Conclusion Prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and provides example of invention. A few of the prior art cited but not applied includes Turnquist (US 5,972,400); Sarshar (US 6,572,115); and Flower (US 6,681,486). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN CUMAR whose telephone number is (571)270-3112. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KRISTINA FULTON can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN CUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 21, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691992
ACCESS CONTROL DEVICE, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM, DOOR PORTION HAVING AN ACCESS CONTROL DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR OPENING A DOOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677991
FOOD PROCESSOR BLADE LOCK MECHANISM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680340
REKEYABLE LOCK WITH SMALL INCREMENTS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680347
SECURE VEHICLE LOCKING
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680344
A Driving Device, In Particular For Controlling A Lock Equipped With A Cylinder Insert, A Rotary Housing Of A Driving Device, And A Toothed Ring Of A Driving Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month