Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/124,805

ILLUMINATING DEVICE COMPRISING A LIGHT SOURCE AND AN OPTICAL REFLECTOR, AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Priority
Oct 25, 2022 — FR 2211092 +1 more
Examiner
JONES, HEATHER RAE
Art Unit
2481
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
529 granted / 767 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 767 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fournier et al. (CN 107637062 B) in view of Dong (CN 216480753 U). Regarding claims 1 and 9, Fournier et al. discloses an electronic device comprising an image-capture unit and an illuminating device configured to illuminate the field of view of the image-capture unit (Figs. 1A and 1B - camera 102 and an embedded light source 106; paragraph [0031] – some embodiments provide a device, the device comprises a camera module capable of capturing the image of the scene in the camera field, and an adjustable illumination source which is adjusted to provide one or more areas of the camera field of view – some adjustable illumination may include selective diffusion of light directed at one or more areas of the camera field of view, restricted areas, objects, and the like; paragraph [0034] – in some embodiments, the light source module can be embedded in the mobile device, and can provide light to be captured by the camera or video recorder of the mobile device of the scene illumination – for example, Fig. 1A shows a mobile device 100 having a camera 102, a sensor 104, and an embedded light source 106); wherein the illuminating device comprises a light source (Figs. 1A and 1B - camera 102 and an embedded light source 106; Fig. 4B; paragraph [0035] – for example, Fig. 1A shows details of the light source 106 – in the detail view, the light source module 106 includes segments 112, 114, 116, and 118 – the lighting elements 108 and 110 are also shown); and an optical reflector (Fig. 4B), the light source having a main direction of lighting which defines an optical axis, the optical reflector comprising a first segment, wherein the first segment comprising a first wall which extends at least partially around the light source over a first height in the direction of the optical axis (Fig. 4B; paragraph [0049] – the light source module may include a reflector having a reflective surface or a lens having a refractive surface, the reflector or lens directs light emitted from the illumination element of the light source module toward the light diffusion material and ultimately exits the light source module and injects the scene to be illuminated by the light source module – the light source module may include a reflector or lens having different shapes, wherein the different shapes of the reflector or lens are adjusted to produce a light beam for filling the region of interest in the scene – the reflector or lens of the light source module redirects light toward the region of interest – the light source may include a reflector 406 of a square reflector such as light source module 408 in Fig. 4B). However, Fournier et al. fails to disclose the optical reflector comprising two segments, wherein the first segment comprising a first wall which extends at least partially around the light source over a first height in the direction of the optical axis, the first wall being is convergent in the direction of propagation of the light, wherein the second segment comprising a second wall which is reflective and extends in a continuation of the first wall over a second height in the direction of the optical axis so as to reflect light rays coming from the light source, the second wall being is divergent in the direction of propagation of the light. Referring to the Dong reference, Dong discloses an illuminating device comprising a light source (Figs. 5 and 6); and an optical reflector (Figs. 4-6), the optical reflector (Fig. 6) comprising two segments, wherein the first segment comprising a first wall which extends at least partially around the light source over a first height in the direction of the optical axis, the first wall being is convergent in the direction of propagation of the light (Fig. 6 – first curved surface 4), wherein the second segment comprising a second wall which is reflective and extends in a continuation of the first wall over a second height in the direction of the optical axis so as to reflect light rays coming from the light source, the second wall being is divergent in the direction of propagation of the light (Fig. 6 – second curved surface 5; paragraph [0034] - as shown in Fig. 6, LED light source at 120° luminous angle radiates on the diverging optical piece through the optical piece lines, 120° light output is converted into 240° light output, which achieves the lighting effect of traditional halogen lamps). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have had an optical reflector to comprise two sections as disclosed by Dong in the device disclosed by Fournier et al. in order to further redirect the light towards a region of interest. Regarding claim 2, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claim 1 including that wherein the optical reflector comprises a third segment comprising a reflective third wall which extends over a third height in the direction of the optical axis, in the continuation of the second wall of the second segment (Dong: Figs. 4-6 – third curved surface 6). Regarding claim 3, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1 and 2 including that wherein the third wall of the third segment has a third angle of inclination relative to the optical axis that is less than 5° (Dong: Figs. 4-6 – third curved surface 6). Regarding claim 4, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claim 1 including that wherein the first wall and the second wall of the optical reflector each comprise at least one pair of two faces (Fournier et al.: Fig. 4B; paragraph [0049] – the light source module may include a reflector having a reflective surface or a lens having a refractive surface, the reflector or lens directs light emitted from the illumination element of the light source module toward the light diffusion material and ultimately exits the light source module and injects the scene to be illuminated by the light source module – the light source module may include a reflector or lens having different shapes, wherein the different shapes of the reflector or lens are adjusted to produce a light beam for filling the region of interest in the scene – the reflector or lens of the light source module redirects light toward the region of interest – the light source may include a reflector 406 of a square reflector such as light source module 408 in Fig. 4B; Dong: Fig. 4). Regarding claim 5, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1 and 4 including that wherein the first wall and the second wall each comprise two pairs of two faces positioned such that the two faces of a pair face one another, one on each side of the light source (Fournier et al.: Fig. 4B; paragraph [0049] – the light source module may include a reflector having a reflective surface or a lens having a refractive surface, the reflector or lens directs light emitted from the illumination element of the light source module toward the light diffusion material and ultimately exits the light source module and injects the scene to be illuminated by the light source module – the light source module may include a reflector or lens having different shapes, wherein the different shapes of the reflector or lens are adjusted to produce a light beam for filling the region of interest in the scene – the reflector or lens of the light source module redirects light toward the region of interest – the light source may include a reflector 406 of a square reflector such as light source module 408 in Fig. 4B; Dong: Fig. 4). Regarding claim 6, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claims 1 and 4 including that wherein the faces are planar (Fournier et al.: Fig. 4B; paragraph [0049] – the light source module may include a reflector having a reflective surface or a lens having a refractive surface, the reflector or lens directs light emitted from the illumination element of the light source module toward the light diffusion material and ultimately exits the light source module and injects the scene to be illuminated by the light source module – the light source module may include a reflector or lens having different shapes, wherein the different shapes of the reflector or lens are adjusted to produce a light beam for filling the region of interest in the scene – the reflector or lens of the light source module redirects light toward the region of interest – the light source may include a reflector 406 of a square reflector such as light source module 408 in Fig. 4B; Dong: Fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claim 1 including that wherein the first wall of the first segment of the optical reflector is reflective (Fournier et al.: Fig. 4B; paragraph [0049] – the light source module may include a reflector having a reflective surface or a lens having a refractive surface, the reflector or lens directs light emitted from the illumination element of the light source module toward the light diffusion material and ultimately exits the light source module and injects the scene to be illuminated by the light source module – the light source module may include a reflector or lens having different shapes, wherein the different shapes of the reflector or lens are adjusted to produce a light beam for filling the region of interest in the scene – the reflector or lens of the light source module redirects light toward the region of interest – the light source may include a reflector 406 of a square reflector such as light source module 408 in Fig. 4B; Dong: Figs. 4-6; abstract - the diverging optical element makes the LED light source converge and extend through several curved surfaces before diverging). Regarding claim 8, Fournier et al. in view of Dong discloses all of the limitations as previously discussed with respect to claim 1 including that wherein the light source is an LED emitting in the infrared, and wherein the walls of the segments are reflective in the infrared (Fournier et al.: Fig. 4B; paragraph [0004] – in some cases the illumination module included in the small device comprises a light source, the light source comprises a lighting element, such as a light emitting diode (LED) or a laser diode; when the lighting element is a laser diode, then the walls of the segments are reflective in the infrared; Dong: Figs. 4-6 – multiple segments). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEATHER R JONES whose telephone number is (571)272-7368. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Fri.: 9:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at (571)272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HEATHER R JONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481 June 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744973
PROGRAM SEARCHING FOR PEOPLE WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENTS OR BLINDNESS
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730504
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND OPERATION MICROSCOPE SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726680
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE ADAPTIVE PLAY SETTINGS
5y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717838
UTILIZING TEXT-BASED INPUT TO DYNAMIC SELECT AND PRESENT SPECIFIC PORTIONS OF AUDIOVISUAL CONTENT TO USER
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713092
4K CONTENT MEMORY FRAGMENTATION VIEWING COUNTERMEASURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+5.5%)
3y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 767 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month